Katelyn M. Alexander , Lauren B. Angelo , Jeremy A. Hughes
{"title":"A Reflective Approach to Enhancing Didactic Remediation","authors":"Katelyn M. Alexander , Lauren B. Angelo , Jeremy A. Hughes","doi":"10.1016/j.ajpe.2025.101375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Approaches to remediation have become increasingly important as the Academy responds to continued admissions pressures and progression monitoring by various accreditation bodies. Remediation is often driven by multifaceted issues, including enrollment numbers, academic preparedness, learner resiliency, efficacy of online delivery, graduation rates, and licensure examination success. Attitudes toward remediation may differ among faculty and students, and perspectives vary widely depending on the stakeholder group and across institutions. Each program has nuances and critical issues that make the challenges of remediation unique, and individualized approaches are often needed when defining the process for remediation. Recognizing this is a complicated issue, reframing the approach to remediation may help uncover various aspects of remediation that can be enhanced. A toolkit targeting remediation approaches for didactic coursework is provided that can be used to help programs navigate the stages of the remediation process and associated policy development. Application of the goals, reality, options, wrap-up/way forward model to identify opportunities to improve didactic remediation is described. Recognizing that there is no one-size-fits-all approach to remediation, taking a more customized approach to identify feasible and realistic options for a specific program’s needs is the focus of this commentary. A framework for designing and reflecting on didactic remediation approaches is threaded throughout.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55530,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","volume":"89 4","pages":"Article 101375"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002945925000208","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Approaches to remediation have become increasingly important as the Academy responds to continued admissions pressures and progression monitoring by various accreditation bodies. Remediation is often driven by multifaceted issues, including enrollment numbers, academic preparedness, learner resiliency, efficacy of online delivery, graduation rates, and licensure examination success. Attitudes toward remediation may differ among faculty and students, and perspectives vary widely depending on the stakeholder group and across institutions. Each program has nuances and critical issues that make the challenges of remediation unique, and individualized approaches are often needed when defining the process for remediation. Recognizing this is a complicated issue, reframing the approach to remediation may help uncover various aspects of remediation that can be enhanced. A toolkit targeting remediation approaches for didactic coursework is provided that can be used to help programs navigate the stages of the remediation process and associated policy development. Application of the goals, reality, options, wrap-up/way forward model to identify opportunities to improve didactic remediation is described. Recognizing that there is no one-size-fits-all approach to remediation, taking a more customized approach to identify feasible and realistic options for a specific program’s needs is the focus of this commentary. A framework for designing and reflecting on didactic remediation approaches is threaded throughout.
期刊介绍:
The Journal accepts unsolicited manuscripts that have not been published and are not under consideration for publication elsewhere. The Journal only considers material related to pharmaceutical education for publication. Authors must prepare manuscripts to conform to the Journal style (Author Instructions). All manuscripts are subject to peer review and approval by the editor prior to acceptance for publication. Reviewers are assigned by the editor with the advice of the editorial board as needed. Manuscripts are submitted and processed online (Submit a Manuscript) using Editorial Manager, an online manuscript tracking system that facilitates communication between the editorial office, editor, associate editors, reviewers, and authors.
After a manuscript is accepted, it is scheduled for publication in an upcoming issue of the Journal. All manuscripts are formatted and copyedited, and returned to the author for review and approval of the changes. Approximately 2 weeks prior to publication, the author receives an electronic proof of the article for final review and approval. Authors are not assessed page charges for publication.