A Reflective Approach to Enhancing Didactic Remediation

IF 3.8 4区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Katelyn M. Alexander , Lauren B. Angelo , Jeremy A. Hughes
{"title":"A Reflective Approach to Enhancing Didactic Remediation","authors":"Katelyn M. Alexander ,&nbsp;Lauren B. Angelo ,&nbsp;Jeremy A. Hughes","doi":"10.1016/j.ajpe.2025.101375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Approaches to remediation have become increasingly important as the Academy responds to continued admissions pressures and progression monitoring by various accreditation bodies. Remediation is often driven by multifaceted issues, including enrollment numbers, academic preparedness, learner resiliency, efficacy of online delivery, graduation rates, and licensure examination success. Attitudes toward remediation may differ among faculty and students, and perspectives vary widely depending on the stakeholder group and across institutions. Each program has nuances and critical issues that make the challenges of remediation unique, and individualized approaches are often needed when defining the process for remediation. Recognizing this is a complicated issue, reframing the approach to remediation may help uncover various aspects of remediation that can be enhanced. A toolkit targeting remediation approaches for didactic coursework is provided that can be used to help programs navigate the stages of the remediation process and associated policy development. Application of the goals, reality, options, wrap-up/way forward model to identify opportunities to improve didactic remediation is described. Recognizing that there is no one-size-fits-all approach to remediation, taking a more customized approach to identify feasible and realistic options for a specific program’s needs is the focus of this commentary. A framework for designing and reflecting on didactic remediation approaches is threaded throughout.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55530,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","volume":"89 4","pages":"Article 101375"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002945925000208","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Approaches to remediation have become increasingly important as the Academy responds to continued admissions pressures and progression monitoring by various accreditation bodies. Remediation is often driven by multifaceted issues, including enrollment numbers, academic preparedness, learner resiliency, efficacy of online delivery, graduation rates, and licensure examination success. Attitudes toward remediation may differ among faculty and students, and perspectives vary widely depending on the stakeholder group and across institutions. Each program has nuances and critical issues that make the challenges of remediation unique, and individualized approaches are often needed when defining the process for remediation. Recognizing this is a complicated issue, reframing the approach to remediation may help uncover various aspects of remediation that can be enhanced. A toolkit targeting remediation approaches for didactic coursework is provided that can be used to help programs navigate the stages of the remediation process and associated policy development. Application of the goals, reality, options, wrap-up/way forward model to identify opportunities to improve didactic remediation is described. Recognizing that there is no one-size-fits-all approach to remediation, taking a more customized approach to identify feasible and realistic options for a specific program’s needs is the focus of this commentary. A framework for designing and reflecting on didactic remediation approaches is threaded throughout.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
15.20%
发文量
114
期刊介绍: The Journal accepts unsolicited manuscripts that have not been published and are not under consideration for publication elsewhere. The Journal only considers material related to pharmaceutical education for publication. Authors must prepare manuscripts to conform to the Journal style (Author Instructions). All manuscripts are subject to peer review and approval by the editor prior to acceptance for publication. Reviewers are assigned by the editor with the advice of the editorial board as needed. Manuscripts are submitted and processed online (Submit a Manuscript) using Editorial Manager, an online manuscript tracking system that facilitates communication between the editorial office, editor, associate editors, reviewers, and authors. After a manuscript is accepted, it is scheduled for publication in an upcoming issue of the Journal. All manuscripts are formatted and copyedited, and returned to the author for review and approval of the changes. Approximately 2 weeks prior to publication, the author receives an electronic proof of the article for final review and approval. Authors are not assessed page charges for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信