Does Stem Design Affect the Incidence of Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures in Arthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fractures? A Secondary Analysis of the HEALTH Trial.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Panayiotis D Megaloikonomos, Lauren Nowak, Michael Shehata, Sheila Sprague, Sofia Bzovsky, Laura Epure, Gianni De Petrillo, Camille Caron, George Laggis, Olga Huk, David Zukor, Mohit Bhandari, Emil H Schemitsch, John Antoniou
{"title":"Does Stem Design Affect the Incidence of Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures in Arthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fractures? A Secondary Analysis of the HEALTH Trial.","authors":"Panayiotis D Megaloikonomos, Lauren Nowak, Michael Shehata, Sheila Sprague, Sofia Bzovsky, Laura Epure, Gianni De Petrillo, Camille Caron, George Laggis, Olga Huk, David Zukor, Mohit Bhandari, Emil H Schemitsch, John Antoniou","doi":"10.1016/j.arth.2025.02.036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate how stem design influences the risk of periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFFs) after hemiarthroplasty (HA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA) for femoral neck fractures (FNFs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a secondary analysis of the Hip Fracture Evaluation with Alternatives of Total Hip Arthroplasty versus Hemi-Arthroplasty (HEALTH) trial, a multicenter, prospective, randomized control trial that assessed THA versus HA for low-energy FNFs. Between 1,374 patients (414 men, 960 women) that were assessed, 72 sustained PFFs (5.2 %). Intraoperative PFFs were recorded in 42 patients, early postoperative PFFs in 15 and late PFFs in 15 patients. The incidence of PFFs was compared between cemented and cementless stems. Within the cemented group (n = 896), we analyzed the effect of taper-slip (n = 482) versus composite-beam (n = 414) designs, while within the cementless group (n = 478), we assessed the impact of single-wedged (n = 206) versus metaphyseal-filling stems (n = 272). The role of collars (n = 87) was also examined within the press-fit stems. Clinical outcomes were recorded with the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cemented stems had a significantly lower incidence of PFFs compared to their cementless counterparts (2.6 versus 10.3%, P < 0.001). There was no difference in fracture rates between taper-slip and composite-beam stems (2.3 versus 2.9%, P > 0.05). Most of the composite-beam PFFs occurred intraoperatively (75 %), while most of the taper-slip PFFs occured late (55%). There was no difference between the press-fit stems, while the presence of a collar did not show protective results (P > 0.05). Patients who underwent HA with taper-slip stems demonstrated inferior WOMAC scores and higher incidence of reoperation for pain compared to those treated with composite-beam stems (2.6 versus 0.4%, P = 0.048).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Cementless stems have a high PFF rate, regardless of the stem type or presence of the collar. Taper-slip stems are responsible for late fractures, raising concerns about their performance in the long term. Patients treated with HA may present a higher risk of reoperation for pain when taper-slip stems are used.</p>","PeriodicalId":51077,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arthroplasty","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Arthroplasty","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2025.02.036","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this study was to evaluate how stem design influences the risk of periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFFs) after hemiarthroplasty (HA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA) for femoral neck fractures (FNFs).

Methods: We performed a secondary analysis of the Hip Fracture Evaluation with Alternatives of Total Hip Arthroplasty versus Hemi-Arthroplasty (HEALTH) trial, a multicenter, prospective, randomized control trial that assessed THA versus HA for low-energy FNFs. Between 1,374 patients (414 men, 960 women) that were assessed, 72 sustained PFFs (5.2 %). Intraoperative PFFs were recorded in 42 patients, early postoperative PFFs in 15 and late PFFs in 15 patients. The incidence of PFFs was compared between cemented and cementless stems. Within the cemented group (n = 896), we analyzed the effect of taper-slip (n = 482) versus composite-beam (n = 414) designs, while within the cementless group (n = 478), we assessed the impact of single-wedged (n = 206) versus metaphyseal-filling stems (n = 272). The role of collars (n = 87) was also examined within the press-fit stems. Clinical outcomes were recorded with the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC).

Results: Cemented stems had a significantly lower incidence of PFFs compared to their cementless counterparts (2.6 versus 10.3%, P < 0.001). There was no difference in fracture rates between taper-slip and composite-beam stems (2.3 versus 2.9%, P > 0.05). Most of the composite-beam PFFs occurred intraoperatively (75 %), while most of the taper-slip PFFs occured late (55%). There was no difference between the press-fit stems, while the presence of a collar did not show protective results (P > 0.05). Patients who underwent HA with taper-slip stems demonstrated inferior WOMAC scores and higher incidence of reoperation for pain compared to those treated with composite-beam stems (2.6 versus 0.4%, P = 0.048).

Conclusion: Cementless stems have a high PFF rate, regardless of the stem type or presence of the collar. Taper-slip stems are responsible for late fractures, raising concerns about their performance in the long term. Patients treated with HA may present a higher risk of reoperation for pain when taper-slip stems are used.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Arthroplasty
Journal of Arthroplasty 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
734
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Arthroplasty brings together the clinical and scientific foundations for joint replacement. This peer-reviewed journal publishes original research and manuscripts of the highest quality from all areas relating to joint replacement or the treatment of its complications, including those dealing with clinical series and experience, prosthetic design, biomechanics, biomaterials, metallurgy, biologic response to arthroplasty materials in vivo and in vitro.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信