Periprosthetic Joint Infection: Are Patients Still Better Off Than If Primary Arthroplasty Had Not Been Performed?

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Justin Leal, Marcus DiLallo, Thorsten M Seyler, William A Jiranek, Samuel S Wellman, Michael P Bolognesi, Sean P Ryan
{"title":"Periprosthetic Joint Infection: Are Patients Still Better Off Than If Primary Arthroplasty Had Not Been Performed?","authors":"Justin Leal, Marcus DiLallo, Thorsten M Seyler, William A Jiranek, Samuel S Wellman, Michael P Bolognesi, Sean P Ryan","doi":"10.1016/j.arth.2025.02.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study sought to evaluate patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) before primary total joint arthroplasty (TJA) and after successful treatment for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), with the hypothesis that patients still demonstrate clinical improvement despite the occurrence of PJI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single tertiary academic center's institutional database was retrospectively reviewed for patients who underwent primary TJA, developed PJI, and were managed for PJI from January 2019 to December 2023. Patients who did not have PROMs recorded were excluded from the study. Pre- and postoperative generic and joint-specific PROMs were collected. Patient pre-primary and post-final revision surgery for PJI PROMs were subsequently compared. The minimum follow-up after PJI treatment was six months. A total of 55 patients (31 TKA and 24 THA) were included with a mean follow-up of 1.8 years (range, six months to 4.5 years). All PJIs were managed via debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR), 1-stage, 1.5-stage, 2-stage revision, or resection arthroplasty.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After final revision surgery for PJI in TKA, patients had lower median patient-reported outcome measure information system (PROMIS) pain interference (PI) scores than before their primary surgery (62.0 [55.0, 67.0] versus 67.0 [65.0, 70.5]; P < 0.01). However, median PROMIS physical function (PF) post-final revision for PJI and pre-primary scores were similar (38.0 [33.0, 42.0] versus 34.0 [29.5, 40.0]; P = 0.08). After final revision surgery for PJI in THA, patients had lower median PROMIS PI scores than before their primary surgery (57.5 [53.8, 64.0] versus 68.0 [66.5, 74.0]; P < 0.01). After final revision surgery for PJI, patients also had higher median PROMIS PF scores than before their primary surgery (39.5 [33.5, 48.2] versus 29.5 [28.8, 34.2]; P < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients who have been successfully managed for PJI show improvement in generic and joint-specific PROMs compared to their pre-primary TJA PROMs.</p>","PeriodicalId":51077,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arthroplasty","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Arthroplasty","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2025.02.011","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study sought to evaluate patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) before primary total joint arthroplasty (TJA) and after successful treatment for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), with the hypothesis that patients still demonstrate clinical improvement despite the occurrence of PJI.

Methods: A single tertiary academic center's institutional database was retrospectively reviewed for patients who underwent primary TJA, developed PJI, and were managed for PJI from January 2019 to December 2023. Patients who did not have PROMs recorded were excluded from the study. Pre- and postoperative generic and joint-specific PROMs were collected. Patient pre-primary and post-final revision surgery for PJI PROMs were subsequently compared. The minimum follow-up after PJI treatment was six months. A total of 55 patients (31 TKA and 24 THA) were included with a mean follow-up of 1.8 years (range, six months to 4.5 years). All PJIs were managed via debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR), 1-stage, 1.5-stage, 2-stage revision, or resection arthroplasty.

Results: After final revision surgery for PJI in TKA, patients had lower median patient-reported outcome measure information system (PROMIS) pain interference (PI) scores than before their primary surgery (62.0 [55.0, 67.0] versus 67.0 [65.0, 70.5]; P < 0.01). However, median PROMIS physical function (PF) post-final revision for PJI and pre-primary scores were similar (38.0 [33.0, 42.0] versus 34.0 [29.5, 40.0]; P = 0.08). After final revision surgery for PJI in THA, patients had lower median PROMIS PI scores than before their primary surgery (57.5 [53.8, 64.0] versus 68.0 [66.5, 74.0]; P < 0.01). After final revision surgery for PJI, patients also had higher median PROMIS PF scores than before their primary surgery (39.5 [33.5, 48.2] versus 29.5 [28.8, 34.2]; P < 0.01).

Conclusion: Patients who have been successfully managed for PJI show improvement in generic and joint-specific PROMs compared to their pre-primary TJA PROMs.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Arthroplasty
Journal of Arthroplasty 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
734
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Arthroplasty brings together the clinical and scientific foundations for joint replacement. This peer-reviewed journal publishes original research and manuscripts of the highest quality from all areas relating to joint replacement or the treatment of its complications, including those dealing with clinical series and experience, prosthetic design, biomechanics, biomaterials, metallurgy, biologic response to arthroplasty materials in vivo and in vitro.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信