{"title":"The Inclusion of the Other in the Self-Scale (IOSS) as a valid self-discrepancy measure after stroke.","authors":"Kirsten Heckmann, Katja Werheid, Simon Ladwig","doi":"10.1080/09602011.2025.2467111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Self-discrepancy, i.e., negative changes in self-concept, is a common post-stroke phenomenon which is closely associated with depression and quality of life. In earlier research, self-discrepancy has been measured with the 18-item seven-stepped <i>Head Injury Semantic Differential Scale</i> (HISDS-III), by comparing pre- and post-morbid self-concepts. As completing this scale may be demanding especially for cognitively impaired stroke survivors, a straightforward instrument is desirable. Therefore, the validity of the <i>Inclusion of the Other in the Self Scale</i> (IOSS), which measures self-discrepancy with a single visualized item, was cross-sectionally examined in 123 individuals three years after stroke. Results revealed a substantial correlation between the IOSS and the established HISDS-III (<i>r</i> = .47, <i>p</i> < .001) and a Gini Index corresponding to an AUC of 0.74, both indicating convergent validity. Both measures showed similar correlations with relevant covariates. Prediction of depressive symptoms using established predictors was significantly improved by the inclusion of the IOSS (Δ<i>R²</i> = .07, <i>p</i> < .001). The findings indicate the high validity of the IOSS as an economic measure of global self-discrepancy after stroke. In addition, the results confirm self-discrepancy as a relevant determinant of post-stroke depression and thus as a potential target for psychological interventions in stroke patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":54729,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychological Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1-20"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychological Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2025.2467111","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Self-discrepancy, i.e., negative changes in self-concept, is a common post-stroke phenomenon which is closely associated with depression and quality of life. In earlier research, self-discrepancy has been measured with the 18-item seven-stepped Head Injury Semantic Differential Scale (HISDS-III), by comparing pre- and post-morbid self-concepts. As completing this scale may be demanding especially for cognitively impaired stroke survivors, a straightforward instrument is desirable. Therefore, the validity of the Inclusion of the Other in the Self Scale (IOSS), which measures self-discrepancy with a single visualized item, was cross-sectionally examined in 123 individuals three years after stroke. Results revealed a substantial correlation between the IOSS and the established HISDS-III (r = .47, p < .001) and a Gini Index corresponding to an AUC of 0.74, both indicating convergent validity. Both measures showed similar correlations with relevant covariates. Prediction of depressive symptoms using established predictors was significantly improved by the inclusion of the IOSS (ΔR² = .07, p < .001). The findings indicate the high validity of the IOSS as an economic measure of global self-discrepancy after stroke. In addition, the results confirm self-discrepancy as a relevant determinant of post-stroke depression and thus as a potential target for psychological interventions in stroke patients.
期刊介绍:
Neuropsychological Rehabilitation publishes human experimental and clinical research related to rehabilitation, recovery of function, and brain plasticity. The journal is aimed at clinicians who wish to inform their practice in the light of the latest scientific research; at researchers in neurorehabilitation; and finally at researchers in cognitive neuroscience and related fields interested in the mechanisms of recovery and rehabilitation. Papers on neuropsychological assessment will be considered, and special topic reviews (2500-5000 words) addressing specific key questions in rehabilitation, recovery and brain plasticity will also be welcomed. The latter will enter a fast-track refereeing process.