Shannon E Munteanu, Matthew Cotchett, Matthew J Oates, Nicoletta Frescos, Vivienne Chuter, Mike Frecklington, Marie T Butler, Nick W Haley, Hylton B Menz
{"title":"Key capabilities required for podiatry graduates: A Delphi consensus study.","authors":"Shannon E Munteanu, Matthew Cotchett, Matthew J Oates, Nicoletta Frescos, Vivienne Chuter, Mike Frecklington, Marie T Butler, Nick W Haley, Hylton B Menz","doi":"10.1002/jfa2.70036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Work-readiness is linked to health professional graduates' job performance, satisfaction, engagement and retention. However, there is currently no podiatry-specific graduate employer work-readiness survey tool that has been developed with employers of graduate podiatrists. The aim of this study was to conduct a modified Delphi survey to achieve consensus among employers of podiatry graduates on the key capabilities required for podiatry graduates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A Delphi method of consensus development was used, comprising three online survey rounds. Purposive sampling was used to recruit individuals with extensive experience and knowledge in mentoring and managing graduate podiatrists in Australia or New Zealand. In Round 1, participants were asked to rate agreement/disagreement with 71 items across seven domains relating to capabilities required of podiatry graduates that were extracted from a literature search and steering committee input. Participants were also asked to contribute further ideas in relation to these items, which were incorporated as new items (n = 7) in Round 2. In Rounds 2 and 3, participants re-appraised their ratings in view of the group consensus. Consensus was defined as ≥75% agreement. In Round 3, participants were also asked to rate the importance of each item as either 'essential' or 'optional'.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-five participants (mean [SD] of 14.9 [5.7] years of experience in managing podiatry graduates in clinical practice in Australia or New Zealand) completed Round 1, 24 in Round 2, and 23 in Round 3. Of the 78 items presented to our expert panel, 61 (78.2%) achieved consensus and were accepted, and 17 (21.8%) were excluded. Of the 61 items that achieved consensus, thirty-nine (63.9%) were rated as 'essential' by 75% of more respondents.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Consensus among employers of podiatry graduates was established on the key capabilities required for podiatry graduates. Sixty-one items were identified across seven domains, and of these, 39 items were rated as 'essential'. The findings of this study have the potential to inform the creation of a podiatry-specific graduate employer work-readiness tool to provide feedback to podiatry education program providers and new graduates in the workplace.</p>","PeriodicalId":49164,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Foot and Ankle Research","volume":"18 1","pages":"e70036"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11842219/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Foot and Ankle Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jfa2.70036","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Work-readiness is linked to health professional graduates' job performance, satisfaction, engagement and retention. However, there is currently no podiatry-specific graduate employer work-readiness survey tool that has been developed with employers of graduate podiatrists. The aim of this study was to conduct a modified Delphi survey to achieve consensus among employers of podiatry graduates on the key capabilities required for podiatry graduates.
Methods: A Delphi method of consensus development was used, comprising three online survey rounds. Purposive sampling was used to recruit individuals with extensive experience and knowledge in mentoring and managing graduate podiatrists in Australia or New Zealand. In Round 1, participants were asked to rate agreement/disagreement with 71 items across seven domains relating to capabilities required of podiatry graduates that were extracted from a literature search and steering committee input. Participants were also asked to contribute further ideas in relation to these items, which were incorporated as new items (n = 7) in Round 2. In Rounds 2 and 3, participants re-appraised their ratings in view of the group consensus. Consensus was defined as ≥75% agreement. In Round 3, participants were also asked to rate the importance of each item as either 'essential' or 'optional'.
Results: Twenty-five participants (mean [SD] of 14.9 [5.7] years of experience in managing podiatry graduates in clinical practice in Australia or New Zealand) completed Round 1, 24 in Round 2, and 23 in Round 3. Of the 78 items presented to our expert panel, 61 (78.2%) achieved consensus and were accepted, and 17 (21.8%) were excluded. Of the 61 items that achieved consensus, thirty-nine (63.9%) were rated as 'essential' by 75% of more respondents.
Conclusion: Consensus among employers of podiatry graduates was established on the key capabilities required for podiatry graduates. Sixty-one items were identified across seven domains, and of these, 39 items were rated as 'essential'. The findings of this study have the potential to inform the creation of a podiatry-specific graduate employer work-readiness tool to provide feedback to podiatry education program providers and new graduates in the workplace.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, the official journal of the Australian Podiatry Association and The College of Podiatry (UK), is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of policy, organisation, delivery and clinical practice related to the assessment, diagnosis, prevention and management of foot and ankle disorders.
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research covers a wide range of clinical subject areas, including diabetology, paediatrics, sports medicine, gerontology and geriatrics, foot surgery, physical therapy, dermatology, wound management, radiology, biomechanics and bioengineering, orthotics and prosthetics, as well the broad areas of epidemiology, policy, organisation and delivery of services related to foot and ankle care.
The journal encourages submissions from all health professionals who manage lower limb conditions, including podiatrists, nurses, physical therapists and physiotherapists, orthopaedists, manual therapists, medical specialists and general medical practitioners, as well as health service researchers concerned with foot and ankle care.
The Australian Podiatry Association and the College of Podiatry (UK) have reserve funds to cover the article-processing charge for manuscripts submitted by its members. Society members can email the appropriate contact at Australian Podiatry Association or The College of Podiatry to obtain the corresponding code to enter on submission.