Patient Perspectives on Clinician Support When Pursuing Permanent Contraception in the United States.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 DEMOGRAPHY
Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-21 DOI:10.1111/psrh.70000
Brooke W Bullington, Madison Lyleroehr, Kristen A Berg, Kari White, Margaret Boozer, Tania Serna, Emily S Miller, Jennifer L Bailit, Kavita Shah Arora
{"title":"Patient Perspectives on Clinician Support When Pursuing Permanent Contraception in the United States.","authors":"Brooke W Bullington, Madison Lyleroehr, Kristen A Berg, Kari White, Margaret Boozer, Tania Serna, Emily S Miller, Jennifer L Bailit, Kavita Shah Arora","doi":"10.1111/psrh.70000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Given the history of coercion in the provision of sterilization, it is important that patients who desire permanent contraception receive patient-centered care that respects their preferences. Recent literature examining the provision of postpartum permanent contraception has not explored whether patients who desire permanent contraception feel supported by their clinical teams.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We interviewed patients from four medical centers around the United States with a documented desire for postpartum permanent contraception. We audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed interviews using rapid qualitative methods and thematic content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 81 patients interviewed, most (n = 64) felt supported by their clinician throughout their prenatal care and delivery hospitalization. Seventeen patients shared stories of feeling unsupported. Patients recalled feeling dismissed when they initiated conversations about permanent contraception. Additionally, they felt they had received incomplete counseling on permanent contraception and felt discouraged from getting the procedure during prenatal care encounters. During delivery hospitalization, patients discussed not being informed about barriers to permanent contraception as they surfaced, facing lack of prioritization of the procedure by clinicians, recognizing communications errors among the clinical team, and feeling pressured to undergo or not undergo permanent contraception.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most patients felt supported by their clinicians throughout permanent contraception decision-making and provision. Patients who did not feel supported reported a spectrum of experiences ranging from rushed appointments, perceived clinician bias in counseling, and communications barriers to the provision of permanent contraception after delivery. Patient-centered care that prioritizes patient experiences, values, and desires is necessary to ensure that all people can achieve their reproductive goals.</p>","PeriodicalId":47632,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health","volume":" ","pages":"63-71"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11945441/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/psrh.70000","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Given the history of coercion in the provision of sterilization, it is important that patients who desire permanent contraception receive patient-centered care that respects their preferences. Recent literature examining the provision of postpartum permanent contraception has not explored whether patients who desire permanent contraception feel supported by their clinical teams.

Methods: We interviewed patients from four medical centers around the United States with a documented desire for postpartum permanent contraception. We audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed interviews using rapid qualitative methods and thematic content analysis.

Results: Of the 81 patients interviewed, most (n = 64) felt supported by their clinician throughout their prenatal care and delivery hospitalization. Seventeen patients shared stories of feeling unsupported. Patients recalled feeling dismissed when they initiated conversations about permanent contraception. Additionally, they felt they had received incomplete counseling on permanent contraception and felt discouraged from getting the procedure during prenatal care encounters. During delivery hospitalization, patients discussed not being informed about barriers to permanent contraception as they surfaced, facing lack of prioritization of the procedure by clinicians, recognizing communications errors among the clinical team, and feeling pressured to undergo or not undergo permanent contraception.

Conclusion: Most patients felt supported by their clinicians throughout permanent contraception decision-making and provision. Patients who did not feel supported reported a spectrum of experiences ranging from rushed appointments, perceived clinician bias in counseling, and communications barriers to the provision of permanent contraception after delivery. Patient-centered care that prioritizes patient experiences, values, and desires is necessary to ensure that all people can achieve their reproductive goals.

在美国寻求永久避孕时,患者对临床医生支持的看法。
背景:考虑到强制提供绝育的历史,希望永久避孕的患者接受以患者为中心的护理,尊重他们的选择是很重要的。最近的文献检查提供产后永久避孕没有探讨是否希望永久避孕的患者感到支持他们的临床团队。方法:我们采访了来自美国四家医疗中心的有产后永久避孕愿望的患者。我们使用快速定性方法和专题内容分析对访谈进行录音、转录和分析。结果:在81名受访患者中,大多数(n = 64)感到在产前护理和分娩住院期间得到了临床医生的支持。17名患者分享了他们感到无人支持的故事。患者回忆说,当他们开始谈论永久性避孕时,感觉被忽视了。此外,她们觉得自己在永久避孕方面得到了不完整的咨询,并且在产前护理期间感到气馁。在分娩住院期间,患者讨论了没有被告知永久性避孕的障碍,因为这些障碍出现了,面临着临床医生缺乏优先考虑的程序,认识到临床团队之间的沟通错误,以及接受或不接受永久性避孕的压力。结论:大多数患者在永久避孕决策和提供过程中感到临床医生的支持。没有得到支持的患者报告了一系列的经历,从匆忙的预约,在咨询中感知到临床医生的偏见,以及在分娩后提供永久避孕措施的沟通障碍。以患者为中心的护理,优先考虑患者的经验,价值观和愿望是必要的,以确保所有人都能实现他们的生殖目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.40%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health provides the latest peer-reviewed, policy-relevant research and analysis on sexual and reproductive health and rights in the United States and other developed countries. For more than four decades, Perspectives has offered unique insights into how reproductive health issues relate to one another; how they are affected by policies and programs; and their implications for individuals and societies. Published four times a year, Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health includes original research, special reports and commentaries on the latest developments in the field of sexual and reproductive health, as well as staff-written summaries of recent findings in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信