Expert consensus on vitamin D in osteoporosis.

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
Annals of Joint Pub Date : 2025-01-21 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.21037/aoj-24-48
Sha Lei, Xiaoya Zhang, Lige Song, Jinhui Wen, Zheng Zhang, Jianqing Tian, Rui Yang, Shuhang Xu, Shanhu Qiu, Richard J MacIsaac, Jasna Aleksova, Fabrice Mac-Way, Marie-Ève Dupuis, David Benaiges, Didac Mauricio, Andrei P Sommer, Joshua I Barzilay, John C Gallagher, Lingling Pan, Linlin Ji, Ping Fang, Ying Li, Qi Liu, Jiasheng Zhao, Ying Xue, Yuqin Shen, Lemin Wang, Junfeng Han, Guanghui Liu
{"title":"Expert consensus on vitamin D in osteoporosis.","authors":"Sha Lei, Xiaoya Zhang, Lige Song, Jinhui Wen, Zheng Zhang, Jianqing Tian, Rui Yang, Shuhang Xu, Shanhu Qiu, Richard J MacIsaac, Jasna Aleksova, Fabrice Mac-Way, Marie-Ève Dupuis, David Benaiges, Didac Mauricio, Andrei P Sommer, Joshua I Barzilay, John C Gallagher, Lingling Pan, Linlin Ji, Ping Fang, Ying Li, Qi Liu, Jiasheng Zhao, Ying Xue, Yuqin Shen, Lemin Wang, Junfeng Han, Guanghui Liu","doi":"10.21037/aoj-24-48","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adequate vitamin D is essential for maintaining optimal bone health, preventing and treating of osteoporosis. However, in recent years, large clinical trials and meta-analyses on the efficacy of vitamin D supplementation to prevent fractures in populations at different risks have been equivocal. The optimal level of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D) remains controversial. Recommendations vary between societies. The lack of standardized assays also poses a challenge in interpreting available research data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched for articles in MEDLINE database through PubMed, which included meta-analysis, systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies that assessed measurement, diagnosis and treatment about vitamin D deficiency. The experts evaluated the available literature, graded references according to the type of study and described the strength recommendations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This expert consensus is based on the review of relevant clinical evidence and provides nine key recommendations on vitamin D deficiency in populations at different risks, especially in patients with osteoporosis. Supporting information is provided in the subsequent appendix box.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This expert consensus is a practical tool for endocrinologists, general physicians for the diagnosis, assessment, and treatment of populations at different risks of vitamin D deficiency, especially in patients with osteoporosis. Clinicians should be aware of the evidence but make individualized decisions based on specific patients or situation.</p>","PeriodicalId":44459,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Joint","volume":"10 ","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11836767/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Joint","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/aoj-24-48","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Adequate vitamin D is essential for maintaining optimal bone health, preventing and treating of osteoporosis. However, in recent years, large clinical trials and meta-analyses on the efficacy of vitamin D supplementation to prevent fractures in populations at different risks have been equivocal. The optimal level of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D) remains controversial. Recommendations vary between societies. The lack of standardized assays also poses a challenge in interpreting available research data.

Methods: We systematically searched for articles in MEDLINE database through PubMed, which included meta-analysis, systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies that assessed measurement, diagnosis and treatment about vitamin D deficiency. The experts evaluated the available literature, graded references according to the type of study and described the strength recommendations.

Results: This expert consensus is based on the review of relevant clinical evidence and provides nine key recommendations on vitamin D deficiency in populations at different risks, especially in patients with osteoporosis. Supporting information is provided in the subsequent appendix box.

Conclusions: This expert consensus is a practical tool for endocrinologists, general physicians for the diagnosis, assessment, and treatment of populations at different risks of vitamin D deficiency, especially in patients with osteoporosis. Clinicians should be aware of the evidence but make individualized decisions based on specific patients or situation.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Joint
Annals of Joint ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
-25.00%
发文量
17
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信