Sha Lei, Xiaoya Zhang, Lige Song, Jinhui Wen, Zheng Zhang, Jianqing Tian, Rui Yang, Shuhang Xu, Shanhu Qiu, Richard J MacIsaac, Jasna Aleksova, Fabrice Mac-Way, Marie-Ève Dupuis, David Benaiges, Didac Mauricio, Andrei P Sommer, Joshua I Barzilay, John C Gallagher, Lingling Pan, Linlin Ji, Ping Fang, Ying Li, Qi Liu, Jiasheng Zhao, Ying Xue, Yuqin Shen, Lemin Wang, Junfeng Han, Guanghui Liu
{"title":"Expert consensus on vitamin D in osteoporosis.","authors":"Sha Lei, Xiaoya Zhang, Lige Song, Jinhui Wen, Zheng Zhang, Jianqing Tian, Rui Yang, Shuhang Xu, Shanhu Qiu, Richard J MacIsaac, Jasna Aleksova, Fabrice Mac-Way, Marie-Ève Dupuis, David Benaiges, Didac Mauricio, Andrei P Sommer, Joshua I Barzilay, John C Gallagher, Lingling Pan, Linlin Ji, Ping Fang, Ying Li, Qi Liu, Jiasheng Zhao, Ying Xue, Yuqin Shen, Lemin Wang, Junfeng Han, Guanghui Liu","doi":"10.21037/aoj-24-48","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adequate vitamin D is essential for maintaining optimal bone health, preventing and treating of osteoporosis. However, in recent years, large clinical trials and meta-analyses on the efficacy of vitamin D supplementation to prevent fractures in populations at different risks have been equivocal. The optimal level of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D) remains controversial. Recommendations vary between societies. The lack of standardized assays also poses a challenge in interpreting available research data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched for articles in MEDLINE database through PubMed, which included meta-analysis, systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies that assessed measurement, diagnosis and treatment about vitamin D deficiency. The experts evaluated the available literature, graded references according to the type of study and described the strength recommendations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This expert consensus is based on the review of relevant clinical evidence and provides nine key recommendations on vitamin D deficiency in populations at different risks, especially in patients with osteoporosis. Supporting information is provided in the subsequent appendix box.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This expert consensus is a practical tool for endocrinologists, general physicians for the diagnosis, assessment, and treatment of populations at different risks of vitamin D deficiency, especially in patients with osteoporosis. Clinicians should be aware of the evidence but make individualized decisions based on specific patients or situation.</p>","PeriodicalId":44459,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Joint","volume":"10 ","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11836767/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Joint","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/aoj-24-48","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Adequate vitamin D is essential for maintaining optimal bone health, preventing and treating of osteoporosis. However, in recent years, large clinical trials and meta-analyses on the efficacy of vitamin D supplementation to prevent fractures in populations at different risks have been equivocal. The optimal level of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D) remains controversial. Recommendations vary between societies. The lack of standardized assays also poses a challenge in interpreting available research data.
Methods: We systematically searched for articles in MEDLINE database through PubMed, which included meta-analysis, systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies that assessed measurement, diagnosis and treatment about vitamin D deficiency. The experts evaluated the available literature, graded references according to the type of study and described the strength recommendations.
Results: This expert consensus is based on the review of relevant clinical evidence and provides nine key recommendations on vitamin D deficiency in populations at different risks, especially in patients with osteoporosis. Supporting information is provided in the subsequent appendix box.
Conclusions: This expert consensus is a practical tool for endocrinologists, general physicians for the diagnosis, assessment, and treatment of populations at different risks of vitamin D deficiency, especially in patients with osteoporosis. Clinicians should be aware of the evidence but make individualized decisions based on specific patients or situation.