Ananya Bhatia-Lin, Nirav Bhakta, Neha Deshpande, Laura Granados, Rosemary Adamson
{"title":"Teaching Internal Medicine Residents to Critically Appraise the Role of Race in Pulmonary Function Testing.","authors":"Ananya Bhatia-Lin, Nirav Bhakta, Neha Deshpande, Laura Granados, Rosemary Adamson","doi":"10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11498","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Race-specific equations for spirometry reference values are one example of race-specific algorithms traditionally used in medicine. The American Thoracic Society now recommends use of race-neutral reference equations instead of race-specific equations. However, no published curricula on interpretation of spirometry using race-based compared to race-neutral reference equations exist. We developed a curriculum for internal medicine residents to address this gap and equip providers to interpret spirometry in a race-conscious fashion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An internal medicine resident and an attending in pulmonary medicine developed the curriculum and invited other experts to review and edit the material. The internal medicine resident delivered an hour-long, interactive, slide-based, didactic presentation during a weekly, residency-wide videoconference to 45 participants. The presentation included the following components: (1) history of spirometry and race, (2) race-specific equations, (3) race-neutral equations, and (4) clinical implications. The presentation opened with a clinical case and small-group discussions. We conducted pre- and posttest surveys; the posttest survey was designed using the Kirkpatrick model to assess reaction, learning, and anticipated behavioral change. Mean score differences were evaluated for level 2 questions using Cohen's <i>d</i> effect size.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-eight respondents completed the pretest survey, and 24 completed the posttest survey. Test scores significantly improved after session participation, with Cohen's <i>d</i> ranging from 0.27 to 1.17.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This curriculum was successful in engaging participants in critically appraising race-based interpretations of pulmonary function testing. The structure of the curriculum could be repurposed to create didactic content on other examples of race-based clinical algorithms.</p>","PeriodicalId":36910,"journal":{"name":"MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources","volume":"21 ","pages":"11498"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11839840/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11498","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Race-specific equations for spirometry reference values are one example of race-specific algorithms traditionally used in medicine. The American Thoracic Society now recommends use of race-neutral reference equations instead of race-specific equations. However, no published curricula on interpretation of spirometry using race-based compared to race-neutral reference equations exist. We developed a curriculum for internal medicine residents to address this gap and equip providers to interpret spirometry in a race-conscious fashion.
Methods: An internal medicine resident and an attending in pulmonary medicine developed the curriculum and invited other experts to review and edit the material. The internal medicine resident delivered an hour-long, interactive, slide-based, didactic presentation during a weekly, residency-wide videoconference to 45 participants. The presentation included the following components: (1) history of spirometry and race, (2) race-specific equations, (3) race-neutral equations, and (4) clinical implications. The presentation opened with a clinical case and small-group discussions. We conducted pre- and posttest surveys; the posttest survey was designed using the Kirkpatrick model to assess reaction, learning, and anticipated behavioral change. Mean score differences were evaluated for level 2 questions using Cohen's d effect size.
Results: Thirty-eight respondents completed the pretest survey, and 24 completed the posttest survey. Test scores significantly improved after session participation, with Cohen's d ranging from 0.27 to 1.17.
Discussion: This curriculum was successful in engaging participants in critically appraising race-based interpretations of pulmonary function testing. The structure of the curriculum could be repurposed to create didactic content on other examples of race-based clinical algorithms.