UK defence rehabilitation review of Achilles and patellar tendinopathy conservative management: a systematic review.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Alice Judd, K Wild, L Puxley, R Barker-Davies
{"title":"UK defence rehabilitation review of Achilles and patellar tendinopathy conservative management: a systematic review.","authors":"Alice Judd, K Wild, L Puxley, R Barker-Davies","doi":"10.1136/military-2024-002892","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Tendinopathy is a common condition affecting physically active populations, such as the military. Diagnosis is clinical, with no gold-standard tests. The role of imaging and functional assessment in subdiagnosis is an active area of research with the hope of delivering more nuanced and clinically effective management. A vast array of injectable and adjunctive therapies have been proposed with varying, and at times, conflicting evidence. Multiple methods for exercise therapy exist, but increasingly tendinopathy is recognised as a heterogeneous condition not suited to a one-size-fits-all approach. The aim was to complete a systematic review, to appraise the recent evidence for conservative management of Achilles and patellar tendinopathy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multidisciplinary team from across defence rehabilitation searched PubMed for literature dating from May 2017 to July 2023. Four key areas were searched: diagnosis and outcome measures, medical, exercise and adjuncts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 840 articles were identified. Articles were screened using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Following screening and abstract review, a total of 143 were included for full review. Due to the breadth of literature and large heterogeneity of studies, meta-analysis of results was not feasible. Articles were assessed against the Oxford Centre for Evidence Based Medicine criteria.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The literature review found the strongest evidence for exercise-based rehabilitation as first-line treatment, with limited evidence for medical interventions and adjuncts. The primacy of stand-alone loading modalities is challenged by developing literature supporting a progressive tendon loading exercise protocol (PTLE). PTLE represents a framework where various exercise modalities are prescribed based on the individual's capacity and function. Novel interventions should be practised with caution and not conducted as monotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":48485,"journal":{"name":"Bmj Military Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bmj Military Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/military-2024-002892","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Tendinopathy is a common condition affecting physically active populations, such as the military. Diagnosis is clinical, with no gold-standard tests. The role of imaging and functional assessment in subdiagnosis is an active area of research with the hope of delivering more nuanced and clinically effective management. A vast array of injectable and adjunctive therapies have been proposed with varying, and at times, conflicting evidence. Multiple methods for exercise therapy exist, but increasingly tendinopathy is recognised as a heterogeneous condition not suited to a one-size-fits-all approach. The aim was to complete a systematic review, to appraise the recent evidence for conservative management of Achilles and patellar tendinopathy.

Methods: A multidisciplinary team from across defence rehabilitation searched PubMed for literature dating from May 2017 to July 2023. Four key areas were searched: diagnosis and outcome measures, medical, exercise and adjuncts.

Results: A total of 840 articles were identified. Articles were screened using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Following screening and abstract review, a total of 143 were included for full review. Due to the breadth of literature and large heterogeneity of studies, meta-analysis of results was not feasible. Articles were assessed against the Oxford Centre for Evidence Based Medicine criteria.

Conclusions: The literature review found the strongest evidence for exercise-based rehabilitation as first-line treatment, with limited evidence for medical interventions and adjuncts. The primacy of stand-alone loading modalities is challenged by developing literature supporting a progressive tendon loading exercise protocol (PTLE). PTLE represents a framework where various exercise modalities are prescribed based on the individual's capacity and function. Novel interventions should be practised with caution and not conducted as monotherapy.

英国防御康复审查跟腱和髌骨肌腱病保守管理:一个系统的回顾。
肌腱病是一种影响体力活动人群的常见疾病,例如军人。诊断是临床诊断,没有金标准测试。影像和功能评估在亚诊断中的作用是一个活跃的研究领域,希望提供更细致和临床有效的管理。已经提出了大量的注射和辅助疗法,这些疗法的证据各不相同,有时甚至相互矛盾。存在多种运动治疗方法,但越来越多的肌腱病变被认为是一种异质性疾病,不适合一刀切的方法。目的是完成一个系统的回顾,评估保守治疗跟腱和髌骨肌腱病的最新证据。方法:一个来自国防康复领域的多学科团队在PubMed检索了2017年5月至2023年7月的文献。搜索了四个关键领域:诊断和结果测量、医疗、运动和辅助手段。结果:共鉴定出840篇文献。使用系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目对文章进行筛选。经过筛选和摘要审查,共纳入143份进行全面审查。由于文献的广度和研究的大异质性,结果的荟萃分析是不可行的。文章按照牛津循证医学中心的标准进行评估。结论:文献综述发现,以运动为基础的康复是一线治疗的最有力证据,而医学干预和辅助治疗的证据有限。支持渐进式肌腱负荷运动方案(PTLE)的文献对独立负荷模式的首要地位提出了挑战。PTLE代表了一个框架,其中根据个人的能力和功能规定了各种锻炼方式。新的干预措施应谨慎实施,而不是作为单一疗法进行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bmj Military Health
Bmj Military Health MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
20.00%
发文量
116
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信