Residents Vote! A Framework and Toolkit to Improve Resident Voting Rates.

Journal of graduate medical education Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-14 DOI:10.4300/JGME-D-24-00509.1
Nikhil Goyal, Taher T Vohra, Samuel Champagne
{"title":"Residents Vote! A Framework and Toolkit to Improve Resident Voting Rates.","authors":"Nikhil Goyal, Taher T Vohra, Samuel Champagne","doi":"10.4300/JGME-D-24-00509.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b> Elections substantially impact health care, yet physicians vote less frequently compared to the general population. Engaging residents and fellows in elections, during training when professional identities are formed, may improve physician voting rates. <b>Objective</b> To examine the feasibility and acceptability of a centralized, institution-wide approach to improve graduate medical education (GME) trainee awareness, registration, and participation in the electoral process. <b>Methods</b> Our framework was implemented in academic year 2023-2024, leading up to the 2024 Michigan presidential primary election. It included: voter registration instruction during resident orientation; emails with election deadlines and nonpartisan voting information; distribution of wearable buttons displaying QR codes linking to information on voter registration, early voting, and mail-in ballots; and informational sessions with legislative experts. We created an open-access GME toolkit for other institutions. We measured trainee voting rates using a single text message question on election day. <b>Results</b> Of 1041 trainees, 115 (11%) attended 4 informational sessions; informal feedback was positive. One hundred twenty-three of 826 trainees (15%) responded to the text message question: 35 of 81 (43%) eligible voters reported having voted or planning to do so that day (statewide rate=23%). No additional funding was required. The institutional GME office provided support for operationalization and wearable buttons. Henry Ford Health Government Affairs supported the informational sessions (held during routine didactic time). <b>Conclusions</b> A series of interventions to improve GME trainees' participation in elections appeared to enhance participation in a primary election with low effort and apparent acceptability. An online toolkit with reference data, tips, and tools was created to allow others to replicate this effort.</p>","PeriodicalId":37886,"journal":{"name":"Journal of graduate medical education","volume":"17 1","pages":"96-100"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11838051/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of graduate medical education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-24-00509.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Elections substantially impact health care, yet physicians vote less frequently compared to the general population. Engaging residents and fellows in elections, during training when professional identities are formed, may improve physician voting rates. Objective To examine the feasibility and acceptability of a centralized, institution-wide approach to improve graduate medical education (GME) trainee awareness, registration, and participation in the electoral process. Methods Our framework was implemented in academic year 2023-2024, leading up to the 2024 Michigan presidential primary election. It included: voter registration instruction during resident orientation; emails with election deadlines and nonpartisan voting information; distribution of wearable buttons displaying QR codes linking to information on voter registration, early voting, and mail-in ballots; and informational sessions with legislative experts. We created an open-access GME toolkit for other institutions. We measured trainee voting rates using a single text message question on election day. Results Of 1041 trainees, 115 (11%) attended 4 informational sessions; informal feedback was positive. One hundred twenty-three of 826 trainees (15%) responded to the text message question: 35 of 81 (43%) eligible voters reported having voted or planning to do so that day (statewide rate=23%). No additional funding was required. The institutional GME office provided support for operationalization and wearable buttons. Henry Ford Health Government Affairs supported the informational sessions (held during routine didactic time). Conclusions A series of interventions to improve GME trainees' participation in elections appeared to enhance participation in a primary election with low effort and apparent acceptability. An online toolkit with reference data, tips, and tools was created to allow others to replicate this effort.

居民投票!提高居民投票率的框架和工具。
选举对医疗保健产生了重大影响,但与一般人群相比,医生投票的频率较低。让住院医师和研究员参与选举,在职业身份形成的培训期间,可能会提高医生的投票率。目的探讨在全院范围内集中开展研究生医学教育(GME)的可行性和可接受性,以提高实习生对GME的认识、注册和选举过程的参与。方法我们的框架在2023-2024学年实施,直到2024年密歇根州总统初选。它包括:居民指导时的选民登记指导;电子邮件选举截止日期和无党派投票信息;分发可穿戴式按钮,显示链接选民登记、提前投票和邮寄选票信息的二维码;以及与立法专家的信息会议。我们为其他机构创建了一个开放获取的GME工具包。我们在选举日用一条短信问题来衡量实习生的投票率。结果1041名学员中,115人(11%)参加了4次宣讲会;非正式的反馈是积极的。826名学员中有123人(15%)回答了短信问题;81名合格选民中有35人(43%)报告说当天已经投票或计划投票(全州比例为23%)。不需要额外经费。机构GME办公室为操作化和可穿戴按钮提供支持。亨利·福特卫生政府事务部支持信息会议(在常规教学时间举行)。结论通过一系列干预措施提高GME学员的选举参与度,可以在低努力和明显可接受的情况下提高他们的初选参与度。创建了一个包含参考数据、技巧和工具的在线工具包,以允许其他人复制此工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of graduate medical education
Journal of graduate medical education Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
248
期刊介绍: - Be the leading peer-reviewed journal in graduate medical education; - Promote scholarship and enhance the quality of research in the field; - Disseminate evidence-based approaches for teaching, assessment, and improving the learning environment; and - Generate new knowledge that enhances graduates'' ability to provide high-quality, cost-effective care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信