Mixed methods scoping review of patients' experiences of urgent and emergency cancer care.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
A L Hurley-Wallace, J Defty, A Richardson, R Wagland
{"title":"Mixed methods scoping review of patients' experiences of urgent and emergency cancer care.","authors":"A L Hurley-Wallace, J Defty, A Richardson, R Wagland","doi":"10.1007/s00520-025-09245-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with oncological emergencies require immediate specialist cancer care to ensure optimum outcomes. This is often a stressful, time-sensitive situation for patients and their families who describe having to navigate complex care pathways to access urgent treatment. Acute oncology was established as a subspecialty in the UK in 2009, with the goal to streamline emergency cancer care. Patient experiences of urgent care in acute oncology contexts have not specifically been explored; hence, it is unknown whether patient experiences of emergency cancer care have improved. This may be due to lack of a patient-reported experience measure for this purpose.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed methods scoping review was conducted from 2010 to April 2024, with the aim of identifying core aspects of the care experience important to patients with cancer during an acute oncological episode, based on published research evidence. Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods articles were sourced and screened in accordance with Joanna Briggs Institute scoping review guidance. Core domains of patient experience were collated and summarised using mixed methods evidence synthesis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen articles reporting on 14 unique studies were included. Issues important to patient experiences of emergency cancer care were described by patients, healthcare professional, and carer proxies. Studies captured experiences of various care delivery models including telehealth, in-person presentation to an Emergency Department, and acute oncology services. Six core domains of patient experience arose from the synthesis: managing emotional distress, being treated with compassion and respect, deciding when to seek help, hospital environment, quality of care and communication, and discharge planning.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is the first review to identify existing literature on patient experiences of emergency cancer care, highlighting core domains of patient experience impactful for patients and their families. Patients' decisions about when to seek help and the impact of discussing palliative care needs during an emergency were more specific to emergency cancer care, compared to issues like the hospital environment, which can be important throughout a patient's cancer care journey. Results will help inform development of a patient-reported experience measure to allow healthcare providers to evaluate and continuously improve specialist urgent and emergency cancer care services.</p>","PeriodicalId":22046,"journal":{"name":"Supportive Care in Cancer","volume":"33 3","pages":"208"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11842481/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Supportive Care in Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-025-09245-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients with oncological emergencies require immediate specialist cancer care to ensure optimum outcomes. This is often a stressful, time-sensitive situation for patients and their families who describe having to navigate complex care pathways to access urgent treatment. Acute oncology was established as a subspecialty in the UK in 2009, with the goal to streamline emergency cancer care. Patient experiences of urgent care in acute oncology contexts have not specifically been explored; hence, it is unknown whether patient experiences of emergency cancer care have improved. This may be due to lack of a patient-reported experience measure for this purpose.

Methods: A mixed methods scoping review was conducted from 2010 to April 2024, with the aim of identifying core aspects of the care experience important to patients with cancer during an acute oncological episode, based on published research evidence. Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods articles were sourced and screened in accordance with Joanna Briggs Institute scoping review guidance. Core domains of patient experience were collated and summarised using mixed methods evidence synthesis.

Results: Fifteen articles reporting on 14 unique studies were included. Issues important to patient experiences of emergency cancer care were described by patients, healthcare professional, and carer proxies. Studies captured experiences of various care delivery models including telehealth, in-person presentation to an Emergency Department, and acute oncology services. Six core domains of patient experience arose from the synthesis: managing emotional distress, being treated with compassion and respect, deciding when to seek help, hospital environment, quality of care and communication, and discharge planning.

Conclusions: This is the first review to identify existing literature on patient experiences of emergency cancer care, highlighting core domains of patient experience impactful for patients and their families. Patients' decisions about when to seek help and the impact of discussing palliative care needs during an emergency were more specific to emergency cancer care, compared to issues like the hospital environment, which can be important throughout a patient's cancer care journey. Results will help inform development of a patient-reported experience measure to allow healthcare providers to evaluate and continuously improve specialist urgent and emergency cancer care services.

背景:肿瘤急症患者需要立即接受癌症专科治疗,以确保最佳治疗效果。对于患者及其家属来说,这通常是一种压力巨大、时间紧迫的情况,他们不得不通过复杂的护理途径来获得紧急治疗。急诊肿瘤学是英国于 2009 年设立的一个亚专科,其目标是简化癌症急诊护理。患者在急诊肿瘤科接受紧急治疗的经历尚未得到专门探讨;因此,患者接受癌症急诊治疗的经历是否有所改善尚不得而知。这可能是由于缺乏用于此目的的患者报告体验测量方法:从 2010 年到 2024 年 4 月,我们采用混合方法进行了一次范围界定综述,目的是根据已发表的研究证据,确定癌症患者在急性肿瘤病程中重要的护理体验的核心方面。根据乔安娜-布里格斯研究所(Joanna Briggs Institute)的范围界定综述指南,对定性、定量和混合方法的文章进行了搜索和筛选。使用混合方法证据综合法对患者体验的核心领域进行整理和总结:结果:共收录了 15 篇文章,报告了 14 项独特的研究。患者、医护人员和照护者代理人对癌症急诊患者体验中的重要问题进行了描述。研究记录了各种医疗服务模式的体验,包括远程医疗、亲自到急诊科就诊以及急诊肿瘤服务。综述得出了患者体验的六个核心领域:控制情绪困扰、受到同情和尊重、决定何时寻求帮助、医院环境、护理和沟通质量以及出院计划:这是首次综述癌症急诊患者体验的现有文献,突出了对患者及其家属有影响的患者体验的核心领域。与医院环境等问题相比,患者关于何时寻求帮助的决定以及在紧急情况下讨论姑息治疗需求的影响对癌症急诊护理更为具体,而医院环境等问题在患者的整个癌症护理过程中都很重要。研究结果将有助于为患者报告体验测量方法的开发提供信息,从而使医疗服务提供者能够评估并不断改进癌症急诊专科护理服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Supportive Care in Cancer
Supportive Care in Cancer 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.70%
发文量
751
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Supportive Care in Cancer provides members of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) and all other interested individuals, groups and institutions with the most recent scientific and social information on all aspects of supportive care in cancer patients. It covers primarily medical, technical and surgical topics concerning supportive therapy and care which may supplement or substitute basic cancer treatment at all stages of the disease. Nursing, rehabilitative, psychosocial and spiritual issues of support are also included.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信