The efficiency and productivity-changing trend of PHCIs since the 2009 health reform in China based on a three-stage DEA and Malmquist Productivity Index.

IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Ling Liu, Jia Peng, Sumit Kane, Chenkai Wu, Yumei Liu, Jiayan Huang
{"title":"The efficiency and productivity-changing trend of PHCIs since the 2009 health reform in China based on a three-stage DEA and Malmquist Productivity Index.","authors":"Ling Liu, Jia Peng, Sumit Kane, Chenkai Wu, Yumei Liu, Jiayan Huang","doi":"10.7189/jogh.15.04045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In China, most primary health care institutes (PHCIs) support ground-level medical services which are essential to residents' health levels. The Chinese government implemented a health reform in 2009 to strengthen PHCIs through increased fiscal inputs. However, how efficiently these inputs were converted into PHCIs' services remains unclear. We aimed to examine the efficiency of PHCIs' medical services and investigate if any changes occurred following the implementation of the health reform.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We aggregated data from PHCIs from Hainan's 18 districts (2011-21), treating those from the same district as one decision-making unit (DMU). We used three-stage data envelopment analysis (DEA) to assess the efficiencies of these PHCIs, adjusting the approach for environmental factors, managerial ineffectiveness, and statistical errors potentially arising from the background variability of measured data that deviates from the input and output values, allowing all DMUs to be compared in a homogeneous environment. We used the adjusted efficiency scores to evaluate the efficiency of PHCIs in Hainan each year and the Malmquist Productivity Index (MPI) to explore the productivity change of PHCIs over time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After adjusting for environmental factors between 2011-21, technical efficiency (TE) decreased from 0.825 to 0.745, pure technical efficiency (PTE) increased from 0.936 to 0.954, and scale efficiency (SE) decreased from 0.883 to 0.783. Seven districts had full PTE (1.0) and two districts had full TE (1.0) after adjustment. The mean MPI from 2011 to 2021 was 0.9430, indicating a 5.7% decrease in PHCIs' efficiency. After excluding the low productivity index possibly influenced by COVID-19 (2019 to 2021), PHCIs' efficiency decreased by 0.49%, with a mean MPI of 0.9951.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The efficiency of PHCIs in Hainan has declined slightly since the health reform. Low level of scale efficiency posed a significant impact on the overall efficiency of the medical services in PHCIs. Among potential inefficient technological performances, future policy formulation might focus more on the imbalanced allocation of resources in less-developed regions and PHCIs' lack of attractiveness to local patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":48734,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Global Health","volume":"15 ","pages":"04045"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11893142/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.15.04045","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In China, most primary health care institutes (PHCIs) support ground-level medical services which are essential to residents' health levels. The Chinese government implemented a health reform in 2009 to strengthen PHCIs through increased fiscal inputs. However, how efficiently these inputs were converted into PHCIs' services remains unclear. We aimed to examine the efficiency of PHCIs' medical services and investigate if any changes occurred following the implementation of the health reform.

Methods: We aggregated data from PHCIs from Hainan's 18 districts (2011-21), treating those from the same district as one decision-making unit (DMU). We used three-stage data envelopment analysis (DEA) to assess the efficiencies of these PHCIs, adjusting the approach for environmental factors, managerial ineffectiveness, and statistical errors potentially arising from the background variability of measured data that deviates from the input and output values, allowing all DMUs to be compared in a homogeneous environment. We used the adjusted efficiency scores to evaluate the efficiency of PHCIs in Hainan each year and the Malmquist Productivity Index (MPI) to explore the productivity change of PHCIs over time.

Results: After adjusting for environmental factors between 2011-21, technical efficiency (TE) decreased from 0.825 to 0.745, pure technical efficiency (PTE) increased from 0.936 to 0.954, and scale efficiency (SE) decreased from 0.883 to 0.783. Seven districts had full PTE (1.0) and two districts had full TE (1.0) after adjustment. The mean MPI from 2011 to 2021 was 0.9430, indicating a 5.7% decrease in PHCIs' efficiency. After excluding the low productivity index possibly influenced by COVID-19 (2019 to 2021), PHCIs' efficiency decreased by 0.49%, with a mean MPI of 0.9951.

Conclusions: The efficiency of PHCIs in Hainan has declined slightly since the health reform. Low level of scale efficiency posed a significant impact on the overall efficiency of the medical services in PHCIs. Among potential inefficient technological performances, future policy formulation might focus more on the imbalanced allocation of resources in less-developed regions and PHCIs' lack of attractiveness to local patients.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Global Health
Journal of Global Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH -
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.80%
发文量
240
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Global Health is a peer-reviewed journal published by the Edinburgh University Global Health Society, a not-for-profit organization registered in the UK. We publish editorials, news, viewpoints, original research and review articles in two issues per year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信