Comparative outcomes of blunt and penetrating diaphragmatic ruptures: A single trauma center study.

IF 0.5 Q4 SURGERY
Turkish Journal of Surgery Pub Date : 2024-12-27 eCollection Date: 2024-12-01 DOI:10.47717/turkjsurg.2024.6514
Muhammed Kadir Yıldırak, Adnan Özpek, Hanife Şeyda Ülgür, Mert Gedik, Enes Sertkaya, Emre Furkan Kırkan, Fikret Ezberci, Hüseyin Kerem Tolan, Metin Yücel, Mehmet Muzaffer İslam
{"title":"Comparative outcomes of blunt and penetrating diaphragmatic ruptures: A single trauma center study.","authors":"Muhammed Kadir Yıldırak, Adnan Özpek, Hanife Şeyda Ülgür, Mert Gedik, Enes Sertkaya, Emre Furkan Kırkan, Fikret Ezberci, Hüseyin Kerem Tolan, Metin Yücel, Mehmet Muzaffer İslam","doi":"10.47717/turkjsurg.2024.6514","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Diaphragma rupture is an insidious case following thoracoabdominal trauma with significant morbidity and mortality rates, if left untreated. Its symptoms might be masked by other associated injuries, which are often present, especially following blunt trauma. Modern imaging modalities might overlook a present diaphragmatic rupture. The real challenge, therefore, lies in diagnosis rather than treatment. To shed more light on this entity, we shared our experience in this regard.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A total of 51 patients were enrolled in the study between January, 2008 and October, 2023, with a diagnosis of diaphragma rupture. Two groups were created, namely patients with blunt trauma (PwBT) and patients with penetrating trauma (PwPT). They were evaluated in terms of demographics, clinical and laboratory findings, trauma associated variables, mechanism of injury, accompanying injuries, imaging results, operative approaches and mortality rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean age was 26 (22-33). 21.6% of the patients had blunt trauma. PwBT had significantly more extraabdominal site injuries and additional abdominal organ injuries (p <0.05). Glasgow coma scale and calculated revised trauma score values were significantly lower and injury severity scores values were significantly higher in PwBT (p <0.05). Significant thorax trauma accompanied 81.8% of PwBT and 40% of PwPT. Mortality was observed in 11.8% of the patients, with hemodynamic instability being the leading cause of death.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A trauma surgeon must exercise great caution not to overlook a diaphragma rupture following, especially, blunt thoracoabdominal trauma since it is both a consequence and reason of significantly increased mortality and morbidity rates. Future studies should focus on various aspects of both diagnosis and management of this entity, such as increasing the preoperative diagnosis accuracy and requirement of mesh usage during defect closure and optimal approach to especially right sided penetrating thoracoabdominal injuries.</p>","PeriodicalId":23374,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Surgery","volume":"40 4","pages":"312-319"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11831992/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47717/turkjsurg.2024.6514","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Diaphragma rupture is an insidious case following thoracoabdominal trauma with significant morbidity and mortality rates, if left untreated. Its symptoms might be masked by other associated injuries, which are often present, especially following blunt trauma. Modern imaging modalities might overlook a present diaphragmatic rupture. The real challenge, therefore, lies in diagnosis rather than treatment. To shed more light on this entity, we shared our experience in this regard.

Material and methods: A total of 51 patients were enrolled in the study between January, 2008 and October, 2023, with a diagnosis of diaphragma rupture. Two groups were created, namely patients with blunt trauma (PwBT) and patients with penetrating trauma (PwPT). They were evaluated in terms of demographics, clinical and laboratory findings, trauma associated variables, mechanism of injury, accompanying injuries, imaging results, operative approaches and mortality rates.

Results: Mean age was 26 (22-33). 21.6% of the patients had blunt trauma. PwBT had significantly more extraabdominal site injuries and additional abdominal organ injuries (p <0.05). Glasgow coma scale and calculated revised trauma score values were significantly lower and injury severity scores values were significantly higher in PwBT (p <0.05). Significant thorax trauma accompanied 81.8% of PwBT and 40% of PwPT. Mortality was observed in 11.8% of the patients, with hemodynamic instability being the leading cause of death.

Conclusion: A trauma surgeon must exercise great caution not to overlook a diaphragma rupture following, especially, blunt thoracoabdominal trauma since it is both a consequence and reason of significantly increased mortality and morbidity rates. Future studies should focus on various aspects of both diagnosis and management of this entity, such as increasing the preoperative diagnosis accuracy and requirement of mesh usage during defect closure and optimal approach to especially right sided penetrating thoracoabdominal injuries.

目的:膈肌破裂是胸腹部创伤后的一种隐匿病例,如果不及时治疗,发病率和死亡率都很高。其症状可能会被其他相关损伤所掩盖,这些损伤通常都存在,尤其是在钝性创伤后。现代成像模式可能会忽略膈肌破裂的存在。因此,真正的挑战在于诊断而非治疗。为了进一步了解这一实体,我们分享了我们在这方面的经验:在 2008 年 1 月至 2023 年 10 月期间,共有 51 名诊断为横膈膜破裂的患者被纳入研究。研究分为两组,即钝性外伤患者(PwBT)和穿透性外伤患者(PwPT)。从人口统计学、临床和实验室检查结果、创伤相关变量、损伤机制、伴随损伤、影像学结果、手术方法和死亡率等方面对他们进行评估:平均年龄为 26 岁(22-33 岁)。结果:平均年龄为 26 岁(22-33 岁),21.6% 的患者有钝性创伤。PwBT患者的腹外部位损伤和其他腹腔器官损伤明显增多(P 结论:创伤外科医生必须对患者的腹外部位损伤和其他腹腔器官损伤保持高度警惕:创伤外科医生必须非常谨慎,不要忽视膈肌破裂,尤其是钝性胸腹部创伤后的膈肌破裂,因为这既是死亡率和发病率显著增加的后果,也是其原因。未来的研究应关注这一实体的诊断和处理的各个方面,如提高术前诊断的准确性、缺陷闭合时使用网片的要求以及特别是右侧穿透性胸腹损伤的最佳处理方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信