A Qualitative Study of Residency Faculty Motivations, Skills, and Preparedness to Facilitate Racial Affinity Caucusing.

Journal of graduate medical education Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-14 DOI:10.4300/JGME-D-24-00308.1
Molly Ormsby, Amanda Weidner, Sarah D Hohl, Tiffany Hou, Grace Shih
{"title":"A Qualitative Study of Residency Faculty Motivations, Skills, and Preparedness to Facilitate Racial Affinity Caucusing.","authors":"Molly Ormsby, Amanda Weidner, Sarah D Hohl, Tiffany Hou, Grace Shih","doi":"10.4300/JGME-D-24-00308.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b> Racism pervades the medical system, contributing to health inequities, lack of Black, Indigenous, and people of color (BIPOC) entering medical education, and poor retention of BIPOC physicians. Racial affinity caucusing (RAC) is a tool to address and dismantle cultural and institutional racism by providing space for individuals with shared racial identities to engage in conversations about their racialized identities and experiences. Little is published on RAC facilitation and training. <b>Objective</b> The authors aimed to evaluate an RAC facilitator training program. <b>Methods</b> Program directors from 32 residency programs nominated 12 faculty for RAC facilitation training, and all participated in virtual trainings and RAC sessions from September 2021 to March 2022. Training consisted of foundational concepts of anti-racism and RAC, and practice co-leading an RAC session. All 12 participated in semistructured interviews. Interview transcripts were evaluated for identified themes. This qualitative study used directed content analysis to discern patterns and cross-walked code categories with constructs from social cognitive theory. <b>Results</b> Interview transcripts for all 12 participants, who included 7 BIPOC faculty and 5 White faculty, were reviewed to discern patterns. Patterns were coded revealing themes for participants' motivations and perceived benefits of facilitator training, critical skills needed for successful facilitation, and resources necessary to implement RAC at home institutions. <b>Conclusions</b> In addition to identifying motivations for participation in training, key skills and resources for successful facilitation were identified, including small group facilitation, managing one's own emotions, understanding principles of anti-racism, and practice and debrief of RAC facilitation.</p>","PeriodicalId":37886,"journal":{"name":"Journal of graduate medical education","volume":"17 1","pages":"48-55"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11838056/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of graduate medical education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-24-00308.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Racism pervades the medical system, contributing to health inequities, lack of Black, Indigenous, and people of color (BIPOC) entering medical education, and poor retention of BIPOC physicians. Racial affinity caucusing (RAC) is a tool to address and dismantle cultural and institutional racism by providing space for individuals with shared racial identities to engage in conversations about their racialized identities and experiences. Little is published on RAC facilitation and training. Objective The authors aimed to evaluate an RAC facilitator training program. Methods Program directors from 32 residency programs nominated 12 faculty for RAC facilitation training, and all participated in virtual trainings and RAC sessions from September 2021 to March 2022. Training consisted of foundational concepts of anti-racism and RAC, and practice co-leading an RAC session. All 12 participated in semistructured interviews. Interview transcripts were evaluated for identified themes. This qualitative study used directed content analysis to discern patterns and cross-walked code categories with constructs from social cognitive theory. Results Interview transcripts for all 12 participants, who included 7 BIPOC faculty and 5 White faculty, were reviewed to discern patterns. Patterns were coded revealing themes for participants' motivations and perceived benefits of facilitator training, critical skills needed for successful facilitation, and resources necessary to implement RAC at home institutions. Conclusions In addition to identifying motivations for participation in training, key skills and resources for successful facilitation were identified, including small group facilitation, managing one's own emotions, understanding principles of anti-racism, and practice and debrief of RAC facilitation.

住院医师教师动机、技能和准备促进种族亲缘关系的定性研究。
种族主义在医疗系统中普遍存在,导致医疗不公平,黑人、土著和有色人种(BIPOC)进入医学教育的人数不足,以及BIPOC医生的保留率低下。种族亲缘党团会议(RAC)是一种解决和消除文化和制度上的种族主义的工具,它为具有共同种族身份的个人提供空间,让他们就自己的种族化身份和经历进行对话。关于RAC促进和培训的出版物很少。目的对RAC引导员培训方案进行评价。方法来自32个住院医师项目的项目主任提名12名教师进行RAC促进培训,所有教师均参加了2021年9月至2022年3月期间的虚拟培训和RAC会议。培训包括反种族主义和RAC的基本概念,以及共同领导RAC会议的实践。所有12人都参加了半结构化访谈。访谈记录根据确定的主题进行评估。本定性研究采用定向内容分析的方法,通过社会认知理论的构念来识别模式和交叉编码类别。结果对12名参与者(包括7名BIPOC教师和5名White教师)的访谈记录进行了回顾,以识别模式。模式被编码,揭示了参与者动机的主题和引导者培训的感知利益,成功引导者所需的关键技能,以及在家庭机构中实施RAC所需的资源。除了确定参与培训的动机外,还确定了成功促进的关键技能和资源,包括小组促进,管理自己的情绪,理解反种族主义原则,以及RAC促进的实践和汇报。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of graduate medical education
Journal of graduate medical education Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
248
期刊介绍: - Be the leading peer-reviewed journal in graduate medical education; - Promote scholarship and enhance the quality of research in the field; - Disseminate evidence-based approaches for teaching, assessment, and improving the learning environment; and - Generate new knowledge that enhances graduates'' ability to provide high-quality, cost-effective care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信