The Interplay Between Multisensory Processing and Attention in Working Memory: Behavioral and Neural Indices of Audiovisual Object Storage.

IF 2.9 2区 心理学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Ceren Arslan, Daniel Schneider, Stephan Getzmann, Edmund Wascher, Laura-Isabelle Klatt
{"title":"The Interplay Between Multisensory Processing and Attention in Working Memory: Behavioral and Neural Indices of Audiovisual Object Storage.","authors":"Ceren Arslan, Daniel Schneider, Stephan Getzmann, Edmund Wascher, Laura-Isabelle Klatt","doi":"10.1111/psyp.70018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although real-life events are multisensory, how audio-visual objects are stored in working memory is an open question. At a perceptual level, evidence shows that both top-down and bottom-up attentional processes can play a role in multisensory interactions. To understand how attention and multisensory processes interact in working memory, we designed an audiovisual delayed match-to-sample task in which participants were presented with one or two audiovisual memory items, followed by an audiovisual probe. In different blocks, participants were instructed to either (a) attend to the auditory features, (b) attend to the visual features, or (c) attend to both auditory and visual features. Participants were instructed to indicate whether the task-relevant features of the probe matched one of the task-relevant feature(s) or objects in working memory. Behavioral results showed interference from task-irrelevant features, suggesting bottom-up integration of audiovisual features and their automatic encoding into working memory, irrespective of task relevance. Yet, event-related potential analyses revealed no evidence for active maintenance of these task-irrelevant features, while they clearly taxed greater attentional resources during recall. Notably, alpha oscillatory activity revealed that linking information between auditory and visual modalities required more attentional demands at retrieval. Overall, these results offer critical insights into how and at which processing stage multisensory interactions occur in working memory.</p>","PeriodicalId":20913,"journal":{"name":"Psychophysiology","volume":"62 2","pages":"e70018"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11843526/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.70018","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although real-life events are multisensory, how audio-visual objects are stored in working memory is an open question. At a perceptual level, evidence shows that both top-down and bottom-up attentional processes can play a role in multisensory interactions. To understand how attention and multisensory processes interact in working memory, we designed an audiovisual delayed match-to-sample task in which participants were presented with one or two audiovisual memory items, followed by an audiovisual probe. In different blocks, participants were instructed to either (a) attend to the auditory features, (b) attend to the visual features, or (c) attend to both auditory and visual features. Participants were instructed to indicate whether the task-relevant features of the probe matched one of the task-relevant feature(s) or objects in working memory. Behavioral results showed interference from task-irrelevant features, suggesting bottom-up integration of audiovisual features and their automatic encoding into working memory, irrespective of task relevance. Yet, event-related potential analyses revealed no evidence for active maintenance of these task-irrelevant features, while they clearly taxed greater attentional resources during recall. Notably, alpha oscillatory activity revealed that linking information between auditory and visual modalities required more attentional demands at retrieval. Overall, these results offer critical insights into how and at which processing stage multisensory interactions occur in working memory.

工作记忆中多感觉加工与注意的相互作用:视听客体存储的行为和神经指标。
尽管现实生活中的事件是多感官的,但视听对象如何储存在工作记忆中仍是一个悬而未决的问题。在知觉层面上,证据表明自上而下和自下而上的注意过程都可以在多感官互动中发挥作用。为了了解注意和多感觉过程在工作记忆中是如何相互作用的,我们设计了一个视听延迟匹配-样本任务,在这个任务中,参与者被呈现一个或两个视听记忆项目,然后是视听探针。在不同的区块中,参与者被指示(a)关注听觉特征,(b)关注视觉特征,或(c)同时关注听觉和视觉特征。参与者被要求指出探针的任务相关特征是否与工作记忆中的任务相关特征或对象相匹配。行为结果显示,与任务无关的特征会干扰行为,这表明,无论任务相关性如何,都存在自下而上的视听特征整合及其自动编码到工作记忆中。然而,与事件相关的潜在分析显示,没有证据表明这些与任务无关的特征会主动维持,而它们显然会在回忆过程中消耗更多的注意力资源。值得注意的是,α振荡活动表明,在听觉和视觉模式之间连接信息需要更多的注意力。总的来说,这些结果对工作记忆中多感觉相互作用是如何以及在哪个处理阶段发生的提供了重要的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychophysiology
Psychophysiology 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
8.10%
发文量
225
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1964, Psychophysiology is the most established journal in the world specifically dedicated to the dissemination of psychophysiological science. The journal continues to play a key role in advancing human neuroscience in its many forms and methodologies (including central and peripheral measures), covering research on the interrelationships between the physiological and psychological aspects of brain and behavior. Typically, studies published in Psychophysiology include psychological independent variables and noninvasive physiological dependent variables (hemodynamic, optical, and electromagnetic brain imaging and/or peripheral measures such as respiratory sinus arrhythmia, electromyography, pupillography, and many others). The majority of studies published in the journal involve human participants, but work using animal models of such phenomena is occasionally published. Psychophysiology welcomes submissions on new theoretical, empirical, and methodological advances in: cognitive, affective, clinical and social neuroscience, psychopathology and psychiatry, health science and behavioral medicine, and biomedical engineering. The journal publishes theoretical papers, evaluative reviews of literature, empirical papers, and methodological papers, with submissions welcome from scientists in any fields mentioned above.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信