Exploring Differences in the Lateralized Readiness Potential in Persons With Multiple Sclerosis Compared to Healthy Controls.

IF 2.9 2区 心理学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Shelby G Martell, Shelby A Keye, Jeongwoon Kim, Anne Walk, John W Erdman, Brynn Adamson, Robert W Motl, Naiman A Khan
{"title":"Exploring Differences in the Lateralized Readiness Potential in Persons With Multiple Sclerosis Compared to Healthy Controls.","authors":"Shelby G Martell, Shelby A Keye, Jeongwoon Kim, Anne Walk, John W Erdman, Brynn Adamson, Robert W Motl, Naiman A Khan","doi":"10.1111/psyp.70022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a neurodegenerative disease often leading to cognitive and motor impairment. Little research has examined motor preparation and initiation outcomes in the brain among persons with MS. The lateralized readiness potential is an ERP component that indexes pre-motor activity evaluating the stimulus (LRP-S) and motor activation for the response (LRP-R). We examined the LRP-S and LRP-R in MS and healthy controls (HC) to understand impairments in neural activity associated with response activation and selection. Persons with MS (n = 53) and HC (n = 53) completed a flanker task with concurrent EEG for LRP extraction. Paired t-tests were conducted to determine differences for accuracy, reaction time (RT), LRP-S, and LRP-R. Within-group Pearson correlations were conducted to investigate the relationship between LRP indices and behavioral performance. Participants with MS had delayed LRP-S latency and reduced LRP-R amplitudes compared to HC for both trial types. In the HC group, LRP-S amplitude and latency were positively related to RT. In the MS group, LRP-S latency was positively related to RT. In both MS and HC, incongruent LRP-R latency was negatively related to RT, suggesting that individuals with a shorter time interval between activation and response had faster reaction times. Persons with MS had delayed response selection, and less neural response activation compared to HC. Impairment in MS is evident for both pre-motor and motor response initiation during a selective attention task. Our study also provided evidence the relationship between action-based components and task performance differ in persons with MS and HC.</p>","PeriodicalId":20913,"journal":{"name":"Psychophysiology","volume":"62 2","pages":"e70022"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.70022","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a neurodegenerative disease often leading to cognitive and motor impairment. Little research has examined motor preparation and initiation outcomes in the brain among persons with MS. The lateralized readiness potential is an ERP component that indexes pre-motor activity evaluating the stimulus (LRP-S) and motor activation for the response (LRP-R). We examined the LRP-S and LRP-R in MS and healthy controls (HC) to understand impairments in neural activity associated with response activation and selection. Persons with MS (n = 53) and HC (n = 53) completed a flanker task with concurrent EEG for LRP extraction. Paired t-tests were conducted to determine differences for accuracy, reaction time (RT), LRP-S, and LRP-R. Within-group Pearson correlations were conducted to investigate the relationship between LRP indices and behavioral performance. Participants with MS had delayed LRP-S latency and reduced LRP-R amplitudes compared to HC for both trial types. In the HC group, LRP-S amplitude and latency were positively related to RT. In the MS group, LRP-S latency was positively related to RT. In both MS and HC, incongruent LRP-R latency was negatively related to RT, suggesting that individuals with a shorter time interval between activation and response had faster reaction times. Persons with MS had delayed response selection, and less neural response activation compared to HC. Impairment in MS is evident for both pre-motor and motor response initiation during a selective attention task. Our study also provided evidence the relationship between action-based components and task performance differ in persons with MS and HC.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychophysiology
Psychophysiology 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
8.10%
发文量
225
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1964, Psychophysiology is the most established journal in the world specifically dedicated to the dissemination of psychophysiological science. The journal continues to play a key role in advancing human neuroscience in its many forms and methodologies (including central and peripheral measures), covering research on the interrelationships between the physiological and psychological aspects of brain and behavior. Typically, studies published in Psychophysiology include psychological independent variables and noninvasive physiological dependent variables (hemodynamic, optical, and electromagnetic brain imaging and/or peripheral measures such as respiratory sinus arrhythmia, electromyography, pupillography, and many others). The majority of studies published in the journal involve human participants, but work using animal models of such phenomena is occasionally published. Psychophysiology welcomes submissions on new theoretical, empirical, and methodological advances in: cognitive, affective, clinical and social neuroscience, psychopathology and psychiatry, health science and behavioral medicine, and biomedical engineering. The journal publishes theoretical papers, evaluative reviews of literature, empirical papers, and methodological papers, with submissions welcome from scientists in any fields mentioned above.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信