Exploring the potential of microscopic hyperspectral, Raman, and LIBS for nondestructive quality assessment of diverse rice samples.

IF 4.7 2区 生物学 Q1 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Jing Guo, Sijia Jiang, Bingjie Lu, Wei Zhang, Yinyin Zhang, Xiao Hu, Wanneng Yang, Hui Feng, Liang Xu
{"title":"Exploring the potential of microscopic hyperspectral, Raman, and LIBS for nondestructive quality assessment of diverse rice samples.","authors":"Jing Guo, Sijia Jiang, Bingjie Lu, Wei Zhang, Yinyin Zhang, Xiao Hu, Wanneng Yang, Hui Feng, Liang Xu","doi":"10.1186/s13007-025-01345-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The enhancement of rice quality stands as a pivotal focus in crop breeding research, with spectral analysis-based non-destructive quality assessment emerging as a widely adopted tool in agriculture. A prevalent trend in this field prioritizes the assessment of effectiveness of individual spectral technologies while overlooking the influence of sample type on spectral quality testing outcomes. Thus, the present study employed Microscopic Hyperspectral Imaging, Raman, and Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy (LIBS) to acquire spectral data from paddy rice, brown rice, polished rice, and rice flour. The data were then modeled and analyzed with respect to the amylopectin and protein contents of the rice samples via regression methods. Correlation analysis revealed varying degrees of correlation, both positive and negative, among the three spectral techniques and the analytes of interest. LIBS and Raman spectroscopy demonstrated stronger correlations with the analytes compared to microscopic hyperspectral imaging. Based on the selected correlation variables, feature screening and regression modeling were conducted. The modeling results indicated that microscopic hyperspectral data modeling yielded the lowest coefficient of determination of R² = 0.2, followed by Raman data modeling result was higher than it, which was about 0.5. The modeling effect of polished rice is the best. LIBS data modeling performed best, with a coefficient of determination of 0.6. The influence of different sample types on the modeling results was less than that of Raman spectroscopy, and modeling results of grains were better. The feature matching analysis of Raman and libs spectroscopy techniques showed that there were spectral variables that could match amylopectin and protein in the features obtained by multiple modeling statistics, but some modeling variables failed to match. LIBS matched more variables than Raman. These findings provide valuable insights into the application effectiveness of different spectral techniques in detecting rice contents across diverse sample types.</p>","PeriodicalId":20100,"journal":{"name":"Plant Methods","volume":"21 1","pages":"25"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11844132/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant Methods","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13007-025-01345-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The enhancement of rice quality stands as a pivotal focus in crop breeding research, with spectral analysis-based non-destructive quality assessment emerging as a widely adopted tool in agriculture. A prevalent trend in this field prioritizes the assessment of effectiveness of individual spectral technologies while overlooking the influence of sample type on spectral quality testing outcomes. Thus, the present study employed Microscopic Hyperspectral Imaging, Raman, and Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy (LIBS) to acquire spectral data from paddy rice, brown rice, polished rice, and rice flour. The data were then modeled and analyzed with respect to the amylopectin and protein contents of the rice samples via regression methods. Correlation analysis revealed varying degrees of correlation, both positive and negative, among the three spectral techniques and the analytes of interest. LIBS and Raman spectroscopy demonstrated stronger correlations with the analytes compared to microscopic hyperspectral imaging. Based on the selected correlation variables, feature screening and regression modeling were conducted. The modeling results indicated that microscopic hyperspectral data modeling yielded the lowest coefficient of determination of R² = 0.2, followed by Raman data modeling result was higher than it, which was about 0.5. The modeling effect of polished rice is the best. LIBS data modeling performed best, with a coefficient of determination of 0.6. The influence of different sample types on the modeling results was less than that of Raman spectroscopy, and modeling results of grains were better. The feature matching analysis of Raman and libs spectroscopy techniques showed that there were spectral variables that could match amylopectin and protein in the features obtained by multiple modeling statistics, but some modeling variables failed to match. LIBS matched more variables than Raman. These findings provide valuable insights into the application effectiveness of different spectral techniques in detecting rice contents across diverse sample types.

探索显微高光谱、拉曼光谱和LIBS对不同水稻样品无损质量评价的潜力。
提高稻米品质已成为作物育种研究的热点,基于光谱分析的无损品质评价技术已成为农业中广泛采用的一种方法。该领域的一个普遍趋势是优先评估单个光谱技术的有效性,而忽略了样品类型对光谱质量测试结果的影响。因此,本研究采用显微高光谱成像、拉曼光谱和激光诱导击穿光谱(LIBS)来获取水稻、糙米、精米和米粉的光谱数据。然后利用回归方法对水稻样品的支链淀粉和蛋白质含量进行建模和分析。相关分析显示,三种光谱技术和感兴趣的分析物之间存在不同程度的正相关和负相关。与显微高光谱成像相比,LIBS和拉曼光谱与分析物表现出更强的相关性。根据选取的相关变量,进行特征筛选和回归建模。建模结果表明,微观高光谱数据建模的决定系数最低,为R²= 0.2,其次是拉曼数据建模结果高于它,约为0.5。精米的造型效果最好。LIBS数据建模效果最好,决定系数为0.6。不同样品类型对模拟结果的影响小于拉曼光谱,颗粒的模拟结果更好。Raman和libs光谱技术的特征匹配分析表明,在多个建模统计得到的特征中,存在可以匹配支链淀粉和蛋白质的光谱变量,但部分建模变量无法匹配。LIBS比Raman匹配更多的变量。这些发现为不同光谱技术在不同样品类型中检测大米含量的应用有效性提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Plant Methods
Plant Methods 生物-植物科学
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
3.90%
发文量
121
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Plant Methods is an open access, peer-reviewed, online journal for the plant research community that encompasses all aspects of technological innovation in the plant sciences. There is no doubt that we have entered an exciting new era in plant biology. The completion of the Arabidopsis genome sequence, and the rapid progress being made in other plant genomics projects are providing unparalleled opportunities for progress in all areas of plant science. Nevertheless, enormous challenges lie ahead if we are to understand the function of every gene in the genome, and how the individual parts work together to make the whole organism. Achieving these goals will require an unprecedented collaborative effort, combining high-throughput, system-wide technologies with more focused approaches that integrate traditional disciplines such as cell biology, biochemistry and molecular genetics. Technological innovation is probably the most important catalyst for progress in any scientific discipline. Plant Methods’ goal is to stimulate the development and adoption of new and improved techniques and research tools and, where appropriate, to promote consistency of methodologies for better integration of data from different laboratories.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信