Bacterial and Parasitic Stool Studies Have Limited Utility in Pediatric Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Patients.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Matthew Nagy, Chiara Wychera, Jeffrey Schemm, Ryan Brewster, Christine N Duncan
{"title":"Bacterial and Parasitic Stool Studies Have Limited Utility in Pediatric Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Patients.","authors":"Matthew Nagy, Chiara Wychera, Jeffrey Schemm, Ryan Brewster, Christine N Duncan","doi":"10.1002/pbc.31617","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diarrhea is a common complication among pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) recipients. Although many of the cases are secondary to graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), stool microbiological studies are often performed to evaluate an underlying infectious etiology. The aim of this study was to assess the frequency and utility of stool studies in children who have undergone HCT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Demographics, clinical characteristics, and stool study results (viral, parasitic, and bacterial) of all patients who underwent HCT at a large, academic, freestanding children's hospital between January 2006 and December 2023 were obtained. Statistical analysis conducted included t tests, chi-square, and linear regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 1381 HCT recipients (9.2 ± 6.6 years) were included. Altogether, 6509 stool studies were obtained among 741 (54%) patients. Salmonella, Shigella, Yersinia, Campylobacter, and Escherichia coli (SSYCE) studies were sent on 363 (26%, 2252 studies) patients with 1 (0.04%) positive result. Clostridium difficile was sent on 706 (51%, 2055 studies) patients, with 156 positive studies (7.6%). Stool ova and parasite testing was sent on 143 (10%, 242 studies) patients, with two positive results (0.8%). Viral studies were sent on 638 (46%, 1960 studies) patients, with 107 positive studies (5.5%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While testing for Clostridium difficile and enteric viruses may have value in the work-up of pediatric HCT patients, SSYCE and O&P studies hold little to no value. Clinical practices surrounding routine stool microbiological studies should be reconsidered.</p>","PeriodicalId":19822,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Blood & Cancer","volume":" ","pages":"e31617"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Blood & Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pbc.31617","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Diarrhea is a common complication among pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) recipients. Although many of the cases are secondary to graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), stool microbiological studies are often performed to evaluate an underlying infectious etiology. The aim of this study was to assess the frequency and utility of stool studies in children who have undergone HCT.

Methods: Demographics, clinical characteristics, and stool study results (viral, parasitic, and bacterial) of all patients who underwent HCT at a large, academic, freestanding children's hospital between January 2006 and December 2023 were obtained. Statistical analysis conducted included t tests, chi-square, and linear regression.

Results: Overall, 1381 HCT recipients (9.2 ± 6.6 years) were included. Altogether, 6509 stool studies were obtained among 741 (54%) patients. Salmonella, Shigella, Yersinia, Campylobacter, and Escherichia coli (SSYCE) studies were sent on 363 (26%, 2252 studies) patients with 1 (0.04%) positive result. Clostridium difficile was sent on 706 (51%, 2055 studies) patients, with 156 positive studies (7.6%). Stool ova and parasite testing was sent on 143 (10%, 242 studies) patients, with two positive results (0.8%). Viral studies were sent on 638 (46%, 1960 studies) patients, with 107 positive studies (5.5%).

Conclusions: While testing for Clostridium difficile and enteric viruses may have value in the work-up of pediatric HCT patients, SSYCE and O&P studies hold little to no value. Clinical practices surrounding routine stool microbiological studies should be reconsidered.

背景:腹泻是小儿造血干细胞移植(HCT)受者常见的并发症。虽然许多病例继发于移植物抗宿主疾病(GVHD),但粪便微生物学检查通常是为了评估潜在的感染病因。本研究旨在评估接受 HCT 的儿童进行粪便检查的频率和效用:方法: 收集了 2006 年 1 月至 2023 年 12 月间在一家大型学术性独立儿童医院接受 HCT 治疗的所有患者的人口统计学特征、临床特征和粪便检查结果(病毒、寄生虫和细菌)。统计分析包括t检验、卡方检验和线性回归:结果:共纳入 1381 名 HCT 接受者(9.2 ± 6.6 岁)。共对 741 名(54%)患者的 6509 份粪便进行了研究。对 363 例(26%,2252 例)患者进行了沙门氏菌、志贺氏菌、耶尔森氏菌、弯曲杆菌和大肠埃希氏菌(SSYCE)检测,其中 1 例(0.04%)检测结果呈阳性。对 706 名(51%,2055 例)患者进行了艰难梭菌检测,其中 156 例(7.6%)检测结果呈阳性。对 143 名患者(10%,242 项研究)进行了粪便卵子和寄生虫检测,其中 2 项检测结果呈阳性(0.8%)。对 638 例(46%,1960 例)患者进行了病毒检测,结果呈阳性的有 107 例(5.5%):结论:艰难梭菌和肠道病毒检测可能对儿科 HCT 患者的检查有价值,但 SSYCE 和 O&P 研究几乎没有价值。围绕常规粪便微生物学研究的临床实践应重新考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatric Blood & Cancer
Pediatric Blood & Cancer 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
9.40%
发文量
546
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: Pediatric Blood & Cancer publishes the highest quality manuscripts describing basic and clinical investigations of blood disorders and malignant diseases of childhood including diagnosis, treatment, epidemiology, etiology, biology, and molecular and clinical genetics of these diseases as they affect children, adolescents, and young adults. Pediatric Blood & Cancer will also include studies on such treatment options as hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, immunology, and gene therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信