Electrodiagnostic Tests as Potential Efficacy Endpoints in Clinical Trials of Novel Pharmacological Therapies for Acquired Retinal Disorders.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Magella M Neveu, Victor Chong, Theo Empeslidis, Hendrik P N Scholl, Anthony G Robson
{"title":"Electrodiagnostic Tests as Potential Efficacy Endpoints in Clinical Trials of Novel Pharmacological Therapies for Acquired Retinal Disorders.","authors":"Magella M Neveu, Victor Chong, Theo Empeslidis, Hendrik P N Scholl, Anthony G Robson","doi":"10.1159/000544702","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Electrodiagnostic tests (EDTs) provide non-invasive, objective and measurable indications of retinal and visual pathway function. These hold the promise of evaluating drug efficacy and disease progression over shorter periods than traditional 'end-stage' outcome measures (e.g., best-corrected visual acuity) in various ophthalmological pathologies. The International Society for Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision has defined rigorous standards for EDTs, intended to optimise diagnostic power, enabling meaningful inter-laboratory comparisons and facilitating application as outcome measures in increasing numbers of multicentre clinical trials. Summary This review outlines the main EDTs, including full-field, pattern and multifocal electroretinography, the electro-oculogram and the cortical visual evoked potential, and highlights the possible role for monitoring disease progression and assessing treatment safety and efficacy. The utility and potential of EDTs are highlighted in studies that have assessed function and tested or monitored treatment safety or efficacy for a range of acquired retinal and optic nerve disorders, including central retinal vein occlusion, diabetic retinopathy, glaucoma, age-related macular degeneration, posterior uveitis and autoimmune-related retinopathies. Key messages EDTs are fundamental to the diagnosis and phenotyping of many acquired retinal and visual pathway disorders. They also provide methods for the objective assessment of the efficacy and safety of potential novel treatments across short periods. Conventional psychophysical tests, such as visual acuity, are of limited value in localizing and characterizing dysfunction, and are not always suitable for monitoring purposes. This review highlights where EDTs may address the need for better outcome measures to evaluate novel treatments within clinical trials, helping to select early treatment candidates and for the assessment of safety and efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":19662,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-26"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmic Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000544702","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Electrodiagnostic tests (EDTs) provide non-invasive, objective and measurable indications of retinal and visual pathway function. These hold the promise of evaluating drug efficacy and disease progression over shorter periods than traditional 'end-stage' outcome measures (e.g., best-corrected visual acuity) in various ophthalmological pathologies. The International Society for Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision has defined rigorous standards for EDTs, intended to optimise diagnostic power, enabling meaningful inter-laboratory comparisons and facilitating application as outcome measures in increasing numbers of multicentre clinical trials. Summary This review outlines the main EDTs, including full-field, pattern and multifocal electroretinography, the electro-oculogram and the cortical visual evoked potential, and highlights the possible role for monitoring disease progression and assessing treatment safety and efficacy. The utility and potential of EDTs are highlighted in studies that have assessed function and tested or monitored treatment safety or efficacy for a range of acquired retinal and optic nerve disorders, including central retinal vein occlusion, diabetic retinopathy, glaucoma, age-related macular degeneration, posterior uveitis and autoimmune-related retinopathies. Key messages EDTs are fundamental to the diagnosis and phenotyping of many acquired retinal and visual pathway disorders. They also provide methods for the objective assessment of the efficacy and safety of potential novel treatments across short periods. Conventional psychophysical tests, such as visual acuity, are of limited value in localizing and characterizing dysfunction, and are not always suitable for monitoring purposes. This review highlights where EDTs may address the need for better outcome measures to evaluate novel treatments within clinical trials, helping to select early treatment candidates and for the assessment of safety and efficacy.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ophthalmic Research
Ophthalmic Research 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.80%
发文量
75
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Ophthalmic Research'' features original papers and reviews reporting on translational and clinical studies. Authors from throughout the world cover research topics on every field in connection with physical, physiologic, pharmacological, biochemical and molecular biological aspects of ophthalmology. This journal also aims to provide a record of international clinical research for both researchers and clinicians in ophthalmology. Finally, the transfer of information from fundamental research to clinical research and clinical practice is particularly welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信