Preoperative thoracic epidural analgesia with and without erector spinae plane block for thoracotomy: A retrospective study.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Tzu-Jung Wei, Hsin-An Hsu, Ping-Yan Hsiung, Ping-Ju Chen, Chen-Tse Lee, Chun-Yu Wu
{"title":"Preoperative thoracic epidural analgesia with and without erector spinae plane block for thoracotomy: A retrospective study.","authors":"Tzu-Jung Wei, Hsin-An Hsu, Ping-Yan Hsiung, Ping-Ju Chen, Chen-Tse Lee, Chun-Yu Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.jfma.2025.02.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Thoracotomy is a highly painful surgical procedure, with thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) serving as the gold standard for postoperative pain management. However, TEA can induce significant hypotension, especially when combined with general anesthesia. The ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) has emerged as a complementary technique for enhancing analgesia while minimizing side effects. This study compares the analgesic efficacy and intraoperative hemodynamic outcomes of preoperative TEA with and without ESPB in patients undergoing thoracotomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study was conducted at a tertiary university hospital, including patients who underwent thoracotomy for tumor resection between March 2017 and March 2023. Patients receiving ESPB prior to TEA were compared with those receiving TEA alone. Postoperative pain intensity and intraoperative hemodynamic stability were assessed. The primary outcome was postoperative pain scores, while secondary outcomes included intraoperative mean arterial pressure and postoperative outcomes such as length of hospital stay.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 64 patients were enrolled in the study, including 43 who received TEA alone and 21 who received a combination of TEA and ESPB. After propensity score matching, 21 patients were matched 1:1 in each group for comparative analysis. Patients who received ESPB in addition to TEA had significantly lower pain scores at 1 h and 24 h postoperatively (p < 0.001). Additionally, they demonstrated higher intraoperative mean arterial pressures (p = 0.036) compared to the TEA-only group. However, there were no significant differences in postoperative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The combination of preoperative ESPB and TEA provides superior early postoperative pain control and enhances intraoperative hemodynamic stability in thoracotomy patients compared to TEA alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":17305,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Formosan Medical Association","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Formosan Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfma.2025.02.021","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Thoracotomy is a highly painful surgical procedure, with thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) serving as the gold standard for postoperative pain management. However, TEA can induce significant hypotension, especially when combined with general anesthesia. The ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) has emerged as a complementary technique for enhancing analgesia while minimizing side effects. This study compares the analgesic efficacy and intraoperative hemodynamic outcomes of preoperative TEA with and without ESPB in patients undergoing thoracotomy.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at a tertiary university hospital, including patients who underwent thoracotomy for tumor resection between March 2017 and March 2023. Patients receiving ESPB prior to TEA were compared with those receiving TEA alone. Postoperative pain intensity and intraoperative hemodynamic stability were assessed. The primary outcome was postoperative pain scores, while secondary outcomes included intraoperative mean arterial pressure and postoperative outcomes such as length of hospital stay.

Results: A total of 64 patients were enrolled in the study, including 43 who received TEA alone and 21 who received a combination of TEA and ESPB. After propensity score matching, 21 patients were matched 1:1 in each group for comparative analysis. Patients who received ESPB in addition to TEA had significantly lower pain scores at 1 h and 24 h postoperatively (p < 0.001). Additionally, they demonstrated higher intraoperative mean arterial pressures (p = 0.036) compared to the TEA-only group. However, there were no significant differences in postoperative outcomes.

Conclusions: The combination of preoperative ESPB and TEA provides superior early postoperative pain control and enhances intraoperative hemodynamic stability in thoracotomy patients compared to TEA alone.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
381
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Journal of the Formosan Medical Association (JFMA), published continuously since 1902, is an open access international general medical journal of the Formosan Medical Association based in Taipei, Taiwan. It is indexed in Current Contents/ Clinical Medicine, Medline, ciSearch, CAB Abstracts, Embase, SIIC Data Bases, Research Alert, BIOSIS, Biological Abstracts, Scopus and ScienceDirect. As a general medical journal, research related to clinical practice and research in all fields of medicine and related disciplines are considered for publication. Article types considered include perspectives, reviews, original papers, case reports, brief communications, correspondence and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信