Evaluating personal care product use by Environmental Working Group hazard scores in relation to consumers' sociodemographic characteristics, purchasing behaviors, and product safety perceptions.

IF 4.1 3区 医学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Emily S Barrett, Karolin Wadie, Kylie Getz, Patricia Greenberg, Taina Moore, Adana A M Llanos
{"title":"Evaluating personal care product use by Environmental Working Group hazard scores in relation to consumers' sociodemographic characteristics, purchasing behaviors, and product safety perceptions.","authors":"Emily S Barrett, Karolin Wadie, Kylie Getz, Patricia Greenberg, Taina Moore, Adana A M Llanos","doi":"10.1038/s41370-025-00751-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Personal care products (PCPs) are a source of environmental chemical exposures. Little research has examined the specific PCPs people use, the environmental hazards posed by those PCPs, and factors informing PCP selection.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine chemical hazards of the specific products used in relation to sociodemographic factors, purchasing behaviors, and perceptions about PCP safety.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a cross-sectional, university-based sample (NJ, USA, N = 593), participants reported on sociodemographics, PCP purchasing behaviors and perceptions, and PCP use in the last 24-48 h (including brand and product name). Those PCPs were linked to product hazard scores (1=least hazardous, 10=most hazardous) in the Environmental Working Group's Skin Deep® database. For each participant, we calculated average hazard scores across all PCPs used and by category (e.g., haircare, skincare) and evaluated use of PCPs with high hazard scores (7-10). We fitted adjusted regression models examining associations of sociodemographic factors and participants' perceptions and purchasing behaviors with product hazard scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 9349 unique PCPs used by participants, 68% matched to Skin Deep®. Average hazard scores varied by participant characteristics (e.g., age) for perfumes/colognes, beauty, and skin care products. The relative risk (RR) of recent use of a hair product with a high hazard score was twice as high in non-Hispanic Black women compared to non-Hispanic White women (RR:1.99; 95%CI:1.37, 2.89). Frequent use of healthy product apps (β = -0.49, 95%CI:-0.77, -0.21), reading product ingredient labels (β = -0.26; 95%CI:-0.82, -0.30), and seeking eco-friendly products (β = -0.17; 95%CI:-0.36, -0.01) were associated with use of skin care products with lower hazard scores. Results for hair and beauty products were similar. Concerns about PCP health impacts and regulation were associated with using products with lower hazard scores.</p><p><strong>Impact statement: </strong>Personal care products (PCPs) can contain numerous endocrine disrupting and carcinogenic chemicals. In a U.S. university-based sample, we linked the PCPs used by participants in the last 24-48 h to hazard scores in the Skin Deep® database. Average hazard scores of the PCPs used by participants varied by sociodemographic factors. Participant behaviors (e.g., use of healthy product apps) and perceptions of PCP safety and regulation were associated with the average hazard scores of the PCPs they used. Our findings suggest that education and tools to inform PCP choice may help consumers choose safer products and potentially, reduce chemical exposures.</p>","PeriodicalId":15684,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41370-025-00751-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Personal care products (PCPs) are a source of environmental chemical exposures. Little research has examined the specific PCPs people use, the environmental hazards posed by those PCPs, and factors informing PCP selection.

Objective: To examine chemical hazards of the specific products used in relation to sociodemographic factors, purchasing behaviors, and perceptions about PCP safety.

Methods: In a cross-sectional, university-based sample (NJ, USA, N = 593), participants reported on sociodemographics, PCP purchasing behaviors and perceptions, and PCP use in the last 24-48 h (including brand and product name). Those PCPs were linked to product hazard scores (1=least hazardous, 10=most hazardous) in the Environmental Working Group's Skin Deep® database. For each participant, we calculated average hazard scores across all PCPs used and by category (e.g., haircare, skincare) and evaluated use of PCPs with high hazard scores (7-10). We fitted adjusted regression models examining associations of sociodemographic factors and participants' perceptions and purchasing behaviors with product hazard scores.

Results: Of 9349 unique PCPs used by participants, 68% matched to Skin Deep®. Average hazard scores varied by participant characteristics (e.g., age) for perfumes/colognes, beauty, and skin care products. The relative risk (RR) of recent use of a hair product with a high hazard score was twice as high in non-Hispanic Black women compared to non-Hispanic White women (RR:1.99; 95%CI:1.37, 2.89). Frequent use of healthy product apps (β = -0.49, 95%CI:-0.77, -0.21), reading product ingredient labels (β = -0.26; 95%CI:-0.82, -0.30), and seeking eco-friendly products (β = -0.17; 95%CI:-0.36, -0.01) were associated with use of skin care products with lower hazard scores. Results for hair and beauty products were similar. Concerns about PCP health impacts and regulation were associated with using products with lower hazard scores.

Impact statement: Personal care products (PCPs) can contain numerous endocrine disrupting and carcinogenic chemicals. In a U.S. university-based sample, we linked the PCPs used by participants in the last 24-48 h to hazard scores in the Skin Deep® database. Average hazard scores of the PCPs used by participants varied by sociodemographic factors. Participant behaviors (e.g., use of healthy product apps) and perceptions of PCP safety and regulation were associated with the average hazard scores of the PCPs they used. Our findings suggest that education and tools to inform PCP choice may help consumers choose safer products and potentially, reduce chemical exposures.

评估个人护理产品使用的环境工作组危害评分与消费者的社会人口统计学特征,购买行为和产品安全感知。
背景:个人护理产品(pcp)是环境化学暴露的一个来源。很少有研究调查人们使用的特定PCP,这些PCP造成的环境危害以及影响PCP选择的因素。目的:研究特定产品的化学危害与社会人口因素、购买行为和对PCP安全性的认知之间的关系。方法:在一个以大学为基础的横断面样本中(美国新泽西州,N = 593),参与者报告了过去24-48小时内的社会人口统计学、PCP购买行为和认知以及PCP使用情况(包括品牌和产品名称)。这些pcp与环境工作组Skin Deep®数据库中的产品危害评分(1=最不危险,10=最危险)相关联。对于每个参与者,我们计算了所有使用的pcp和类别(如护发、护肤)的平均危害评分,并评估了高危害评分(7-10)的pcp的使用情况。我们拟合了调整后的回归模型,考察了社会人口因素、参与者的认知和购买行为与产品危害评分之间的关系。结果:在参与者使用的9349种独特pcp中,68%与Skin Deep®匹配。香水/古龙水、美容产品和护肤品的平均危害评分因参与者特征(如年龄)而异。非西班牙裔黑人女性最近使用高危险评分护发产品的相对风险(RR)是非西班牙裔白人女性的两倍(RR:1.99;95%置信区间:1.37,2.89)。频繁使用健康产品应用程序(β = -0.49, 95%CI:-0.77, -0.21),阅读产品成分标签(β = -0.26;95%CI:-0.82, -0.30),并寻求环保产品(β = -0.17;95%CI:-0.36, -0.01)与使用危害评分较低的护肤品相关。美发和美容产品的结果相似。对PCP健康影响和监管的担忧与使用危害评分较低的产品有关。影响声明:个人护理产品(pcp)可能含有许多内分泌干扰和致癌化学物质。在以美国大学为基础的样本中,我们将参与者在过去24-48小时内使用的pcp与Skin Deep®数据库中的危险评分联系起来。参与者使用的pcp的平均危险评分因社会人口因素而异。参与者的行为(例如,使用健康产品应用程序)以及对PCP安全性和监管的认知与他们使用的PCP的平均危害评分有关。我们的研究结果表明,教育和工具告知PCP的选择可能有助于消费者选择更安全的产品,并可能减少化学品的暴露。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
93
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology (JESEE) aims to be the premier and authoritative source of information on advances in exposure science for professionals in a wide range of environmental and public health disciplines. JESEE publishes original peer-reviewed research presenting significant advances in exposure science and exposure analysis, including development and application of the latest technologies for measuring exposures, and innovative computational approaches for translating novel data streams to characterize and predict exposures. The types of papers published in the research section of JESEE are original research articles, translation studies, and correspondence. Reported results should further understanding of the relationship between environmental exposure and human health, describe evaluated novel exposure science tools, or demonstrate potential of exposure science to enable decisions and actions that promote and protect human health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信