Clinical significance of 4 L lymphadenectomy in solid dominant clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer in the left upper lobe.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Yukio Watanabe, Aritoshi Hattori, Mariko Fukui, Takeshi Matsunaga, Kazuya Takamochi, Kenji Suzuki
{"title":"Clinical significance of 4 L lymphadenectomy in solid dominant clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer in the left upper lobe.","authors":"Yukio Watanabe, Aritoshi Hattori, Mariko Fukui, Takeshi Matsunaga, Kazuya Takamochi, Kenji Suzuki","doi":"10.1093/jjco/hyaf032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The significance of station 4 L lymph node dissection (LND) for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We evaluated 342 patients who underwent complete anatomical resection and mediastinal LND for radiologically solid dominant clinical (c)-Stage I left upper lobe NSCLC between 2008 and 2022. Solid dominant was defined as a consolidation tumor ratio >0.5, on thin-section computed tomography. After matching, postoperative complications and outcomes between the 4 L LND and non-4 L LND groups were compared. Predictors of 4 L metastasis was also identified using logistic regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>4LND was performed in 215 patients (63%), and 4 L metastasis was detected in 11 patients. Matching yielded 108 pairs. Recurrent nerve paralysis was more frequent in the 4LND group (P = 0.02) with no significant differences in the overall survival (OS) (5y OS: 85.2% vs. 86.3%, P = 0.66) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) (5y RFS: 78.4% vs. 78.5%, P = 0.51) between the 4 L LND and non-4 L LND groups. Logistic regression analysis determined solid component size >20 mm (P = 0.02) and pleural indentation (P = 0.02) on computed tomography findings as clinical risk factors for 4 L metastasis. The predictive criteria for 4 L metastasis were defined as solid component size ≤20 mm without pleural indentation (specificity: 100%, positive predictive value: 100%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>4 L LND had a higher frequency of recurrent nerve palsy, although no survival improvement was observed in solid dominant c-Stage I left upper NSCLC. 4 L LND may be omitted for solid component size ≤20 mm without pleural indentation.</p>","PeriodicalId":14656,"journal":{"name":"Japanese journal of clinical oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese journal of clinical oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jjco/hyaf032","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The significance of station 4 L lymph node dissection (LND) for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is unknown.

Methods: We evaluated 342 patients who underwent complete anatomical resection and mediastinal LND for radiologically solid dominant clinical (c)-Stage I left upper lobe NSCLC between 2008 and 2022. Solid dominant was defined as a consolidation tumor ratio >0.5, on thin-section computed tomography. After matching, postoperative complications and outcomes between the 4 L LND and non-4 L LND groups were compared. Predictors of 4 L metastasis was also identified using logistic regression analysis.

Results: 4LND was performed in 215 patients (63%), and 4 L metastasis was detected in 11 patients. Matching yielded 108 pairs. Recurrent nerve paralysis was more frequent in the 4LND group (P = 0.02) with no significant differences in the overall survival (OS) (5y OS: 85.2% vs. 86.3%, P = 0.66) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) (5y RFS: 78.4% vs. 78.5%, P = 0.51) between the 4 L LND and non-4 L LND groups. Logistic regression analysis determined solid component size >20 mm (P = 0.02) and pleural indentation (P = 0.02) on computed tomography findings as clinical risk factors for 4 L metastasis. The predictive criteria for 4 L metastasis were defined as solid component size ≤20 mm without pleural indentation (specificity: 100%, positive predictive value: 100%).

Conclusions: 4 L LND had a higher frequency of recurrent nerve palsy, although no survival improvement was observed in solid dominant c-Stage I left upper NSCLC. 4 L LND may be omitted for solid component size ≤20 mm without pleural indentation.

左上肺叶实性显性临床I期非小细胞肺癌4l淋巴结切除术的临床意义。
目的:4l淋巴结清扫(LND)对早期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的意义尚不明确。方法:我们评估了2008年至2022年间342例接受完全解剖切除和纵隔LND的放射学上坚固的显性临床(c)期左上叶NSCLC患者。在薄层计算机断层扫描上,实性优势被定义为实变肿瘤比>.5。配对后比较4l LND组与非4l LND组的术后并发症及预后。使用logistic回归分析也确定了4l转移的预测因素。结果:215例(63%)患者行4LND手术,11例患者发现4l转移。配对得到108对。4LND组复发性神经麻痹发生率更高(P = 0.02), 4l LND组与非4l LND组总生存率(OS) (5y OS: 85.2% vs. 86.3%, P = 0.66)和无复发生存率(RFS) (5y RFS: 78.4% vs. 78.5%, P = 0.51)差异无统计学意义。逻辑回归分析确定固体成分尺寸>20 mm (P = 0.02)和胸膜压痕(P = 0.02)在计算机断层扫描上的表现是4l转移的临床危险因素。4l转移的预测标准定义为固体成分大小≤20mm,无胸膜压痕(特异性:100%,阳性预测值:100%)。结论:4l LND有更高的复发性神经麻痹的频率,尽管在实体显性c- I期左上部NSCLC中没有观察到生存改善。对于尺寸≤20mm且无胸膜压痕的固体部件,可省略4l LND。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
177
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology is a multidisciplinary journal for clinical oncologists which strives to publish high quality manuscripts addressing medical oncology, clinical trials, radiology, surgery, basic research, and palliative care. The journal aims to contribute to the world"s scientific community with special attention to the area of clinical oncology and the Asian region. JJCO publishes various articles types including: ・Original Articles ・Case Reports ・Clinical Trial Notes ・Cancer Genetics Reports ・Epidemiology Notes ・Technical Notes ・Short Communications ・Letters to the Editors ・Solicited Reviews
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信