Effects of high-fiber, high-fruit and high-vegetable, low-fat dietary intervention on the rectal tissue microbiome.

IF 9.9 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Doratha A Byrd, Maria Gomez, Stephanie Hogue, Yunhu Wan, Ana Ortega-Villa, Andrew Warner, Casey Dagnall, Kristine Jones, Belynda Hicks, Paul Albert, Gwen Murphy, Rashmi Sinha, Emily Vogtmann
{"title":"Effects of high-fiber, high-fruit and high-vegetable, low-fat dietary intervention on the rectal tissue microbiome.","authors":"Doratha A Byrd, Maria Gomez, Stephanie Hogue, Yunhu Wan, Ana Ortega-Villa, Andrew Warner, Casey Dagnall, Kristine Jones, Belynda Hicks, Paul Albert, Gwen Murphy, Rashmi Sinha, Emily Vogtmann","doi":"10.1093/jnci/djaf034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Emerging evidence suggests that bacteria residing in colorectal tissue are plausibly associated with colorectal cancer (CRC). Prior studies investigated the effects of dietary interventions on the fecal microbiome, but few assessed colorectal tissue microbiome endpoints. We investigated the effects of a high-fiber, high-fruit and -vegetable, low-fat dietary intervention on the rectal tissue microbiome in the Polyp Prevention Trial (PPT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PPT is a 4-year randomized clinical trial with intervention goals of consuming: 1) ≥ 18 g of fiber per 1,000 kcal/day; 2) ≥3.5 servings of fruits and vegetables per 1,000 kcal/day; and 3) <20% of kcal/day from fat. Using 16S rRNA gene sequencing, we characterized bacteria in rectal biopsies collected at baseline and the end of years 1 and 4 (N = 233 in intervention arm and N = 222 in control arm). We estimated effects of the intervention on alpha/beta diversity and relative abundance of a priori-selected bacteria using repeated-measures linear mixed-effects models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The intervention did not statistically significantly modify rectal tissue alpha diversity. Compared to the control arm, relative abundance of a priori-selected Porphyromonas (absolute intervention effects [standard errors] at T1 vs T0=-0.24 [0.07] and T4 vs T0=-0.12 [0.07]; P = .004) and Prevotella (absolute intervention effects at T1 vs T0=-0.40 [0.14] and at T4 vs T0=-0.32 [0.15]; P = .01) were more strongly decreased in the intervention arm.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The PPT intervention did not influence rectal tissue microbiome diversity nor the relative abundance of most bacteria, except for two oral-originating bacteria that were previously associated with CRC presence.</p><p><strong>Original clinical trial registry number: </strong>NCT00339625.</p>","PeriodicalId":14809,"journal":{"name":"JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djaf034","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Emerging evidence suggests that bacteria residing in colorectal tissue are plausibly associated with colorectal cancer (CRC). Prior studies investigated the effects of dietary interventions on the fecal microbiome, but few assessed colorectal tissue microbiome endpoints. We investigated the effects of a high-fiber, high-fruit and -vegetable, low-fat dietary intervention on the rectal tissue microbiome in the Polyp Prevention Trial (PPT).

Methods: PPT is a 4-year randomized clinical trial with intervention goals of consuming: 1) ≥ 18 g of fiber per 1,000 kcal/day; 2) ≥3.5 servings of fruits and vegetables per 1,000 kcal/day; and 3) <20% of kcal/day from fat. Using 16S rRNA gene sequencing, we characterized bacteria in rectal biopsies collected at baseline and the end of years 1 and 4 (N = 233 in intervention arm and N = 222 in control arm). We estimated effects of the intervention on alpha/beta diversity and relative abundance of a priori-selected bacteria using repeated-measures linear mixed-effects models.

Results: The intervention did not statistically significantly modify rectal tissue alpha diversity. Compared to the control arm, relative abundance of a priori-selected Porphyromonas (absolute intervention effects [standard errors] at T1 vs T0=-0.24 [0.07] and T4 vs T0=-0.12 [0.07]; P = .004) and Prevotella (absolute intervention effects at T1 vs T0=-0.40 [0.14] and at T4 vs T0=-0.32 [0.15]; P = .01) were more strongly decreased in the intervention arm.

Conclusion: The PPT intervention did not influence rectal tissue microbiome diversity nor the relative abundance of most bacteria, except for two oral-originating bacteria that were previously associated with CRC presence.

Original clinical trial registry number: NCT00339625.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
203
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the National Cancer Institute is a reputable publication that undergoes a peer-review process. It is available in both print (ISSN: 0027-8874) and online (ISSN: 1460-2105) formats, with 12 issues released annually. The journal's primary aim is to disseminate innovative and important discoveries in the field of cancer research, with specific emphasis on clinical, epidemiologic, behavioral, and health outcomes studies. Authors are encouraged to submit reviews, minireviews, and commentaries. The journal ensures that submitted manuscripts undergo a rigorous and expedited review to publish scientifically and medically significant findings in a timely manner.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信