Fascia and Muscle Stiffness in Soccer Athletes with and Without Previous Hamstring Injury.

IF 2.6 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
Eleftherios Kellis, Afxentios Kekelekis, Eleni E Drakonaki
{"title":"Fascia and Muscle Stiffness in Soccer Athletes with and Without Previous Hamstring Injury.","authors":"Eleftherios Kellis, Afxentios Kekelekis, Eleni E Drakonaki","doi":"10.3390/jfmk10010048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives:</b> Despite extensive efforts to reduce injuries to the hamstrings, the injury rate among athletes is increasing. The purpose of this study was to examine fascia and muscle stiffness differences between ten soccer players with a previous biceps femoris long head (BF) injury and thirteen controls. <b>Methods:</b> The shear-wave elastic (SWE) modulus and surface electromyography signal from the semitendinosus (ST) and BF were measured during passive and active knee flexion efforts from 0°, 45°, and 90° knee flexion angles. Anatomical cross-sectional area (CSA) and maximum isometric strength were also obtained. <b>Results:</b> Analysis of variance showed that the injured group showed significantly greater active (<i>p</i> < 0.05) but similar passive SWE modulus of BF and ST fascia and muscle than the uninjured group. Compared to the non-injured group, injured athletes had lower isometric strength and BF anatomical CSA (<i>p</i> < 0.05) but similar electromyographic activation amplitude (<i>p</i> > 0.05). <b>Conclusions:</b> The greater fascia stiffness during active submaximal contractions, in comparison to controls, might have an impact on hamstring function in soccer players with BF injuries who returned to play. Injured players may benefit from therapeutic interventions that aim to restore fascia and muscle tissue stiffness.</p>","PeriodicalId":16052,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11843906/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jfmk10010048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Despite extensive efforts to reduce injuries to the hamstrings, the injury rate among athletes is increasing. The purpose of this study was to examine fascia and muscle stiffness differences between ten soccer players with a previous biceps femoris long head (BF) injury and thirteen controls. Methods: The shear-wave elastic (SWE) modulus and surface electromyography signal from the semitendinosus (ST) and BF were measured during passive and active knee flexion efforts from 0°, 45°, and 90° knee flexion angles. Anatomical cross-sectional area (CSA) and maximum isometric strength were also obtained. Results: Analysis of variance showed that the injured group showed significantly greater active (p < 0.05) but similar passive SWE modulus of BF and ST fascia and muscle than the uninjured group. Compared to the non-injured group, injured athletes had lower isometric strength and BF anatomical CSA (p < 0.05) but similar electromyographic activation amplitude (p > 0.05). Conclusions: The greater fascia stiffness during active submaximal contractions, in comparison to controls, might have an impact on hamstring function in soccer players with BF injuries who returned to play. Injured players may benefit from therapeutic interventions that aim to restore fascia and muscle tissue stiffness.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology
Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology Health Professions-Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
94
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信