Work rate adjustments needed to maintain heart rate and RPE during high-intensity interval training in the heat.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 PHYSIOLOGY
Frontiers in Physiology Pub Date : 2025-02-06 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fphys.2025.1506325
Hillary A Yoder, Anne M Mulholland, Hayley V MacDonald, Jonathan E Wingo
{"title":"Work rate adjustments needed to maintain heart rate and RPE during high-intensity interval training in the heat.","authors":"Hillary A Yoder, Anne M Mulholland, Hayley V MacDonald, Jonathan E Wingo","doi":"10.3389/fphys.2025.1506325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Higher work rates may be sustainable when maintaining target rating of perceived exertion (RPE) compared to maintaining target heart rate (THR) during high-intensity interval training (HIIT) exercise in hot conditions, but may also result in greater thermal strain and cardiovascular drift, as well as greater decrements in maximal oxygen uptake ( <math> <mrow><mover><mi>V</mi> <mo>˙</mo></mover> </mrow> </math> O<sub>2max</sub>).</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To test the hypotheses that maintaining target RPE compared to THR during HIIT in the heat results in 1) smaller work rate adjustments, 2) greater thermal and cardiovascular strain, and 3) larger decreases in <math> <mrow><mover><mi>V</mi> <mo>˙</mo></mover> </mrow> </math> O<sub>2max</sub>.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eight adults (4 women) completed a graded exercise test on a cycle ergometer in 22°C and then 4 cycling trials in 35°C, consisting of an 8-min warm-up at 70% maximal heart rate (HR<sub>max</sub>) or 12 RPE followed by 1 (15<sub>HR</sub> and 15<sub>RPE</sub>) or 5 (43<sub>HR</sub> and 43<sub>RPE</sub>) rounds of HIIT (1 round = 4 min work at 90% HR<sub>max</sub> or 17 RPE and 3 min recovery at 70% HR<sub>max</sub> or 12 RPE) totaling 15 min or 43 min of exercise, respectively. Each trial ended with a GXT to measure <math> <mrow><mover><mi>V</mi> <mo>˙</mo></mover> </mrow> </math> O<sub>2max</sub>.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the 43-min trials work rate decreased from the first to the fifth work interval in both conditions, but by a non-significant, yet moderately larger (ES = 0.53) amount during 43<sub>HR</sub> (46 ± 29 W) compared to 43<sub>RPE</sub> (30 ± 28 W). From the first to fifth work interval HR increased over time by 12 b⋅min<sup>-1</sup> in 43<sub>RPE</sub> (<i>p</i> < 0.001), but did not increase during 43<sub>HR</sub> (<i>p</i> = 0.36). Rectal temperature increases were not different between conditions (43<sub>HR</sub> = 0.7°C, <i>p</i> < 0.001; 43<sub>RPE</sub> = 0.8°C, <i>p</i> < 0.001). <math> <mrow><mover><mi>V</mi> <mo>˙</mo></mover> </mrow> </math> O<sub>2max</sub> decreased 15.6% (ES = 0.41) between 15<sub>RPE</sub> and 43<sub>RPE</sub> (<i>p</i> = 0.005), but it was not different over time during the HR-based trials [6.5%, ES = 0.16 (α adjusted for multiple comparisons = 0.0125) <i>p</i> = 0.03].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Maintaining target RPE and THR require considerable declines in work rate during HIIT in the heat, with ∼53% larger declines needed to maintain THR. The mitigation of cardiovascular drift in the THR trial may have contributed to the preservation of <math> <mrow><mover><mi>V</mi> <mo>˙</mo></mover> </mrow> </math> O<sub>2max</sub>.</p>","PeriodicalId":12477,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Physiology","volume":"16 ","pages":"1506325"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11839774/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2025.1506325","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Higher work rates may be sustainable when maintaining target rating of perceived exertion (RPE) compared to maintaining target heart rate (THR) during high-intensity interval training (HIIT) exercise in hot conditions, but may also result in greater thermal strain and cardiovascular drift, as well as greater decrements in maximal oxygen uptake ( V ˙ O2max).

Purpose: To test the hypotheses that maintaining target RPE compared to THR during HIIT in the heat results in 1) smaller work rate adjustments, 2) greater thermal and cardiovascular strain, and 3) larger decreases in V ˙ O2max.

Methods: Eight adults (4 women) completed a graded exercise test on a cycle ergometer in 22°C and then 4 cycling trials in 35°C, consisting of an 8-min warm-up at 70% maximal heart rate (HRmax) or 12 RPE followed by 1 (15HR and 15RPE) or 5 (43HR and 43RPE) rounds of HIIT (1 round = 4 min work at 90% HRmax or 17 RPE and 3 min recovery at 70% HRmax or 12 RPE) totaling 15 min or 43 min of exercise, respectively. Each trial ended with a GXT to measure V ˙ O2max.

Results: In the 43-min trials work rate decreased from the first to the fifth work interval in both conditions, but by a non-significant, yet moderately larger (ES = 0.53) amount during 43HR (46 ± 29 W) compared to 43RPE (30 ± 28 W). From the first to fifth work interval HR increased over time by 12 b⋅min-1 in 43RPE (p < 0.001), but did not increase during 43HR (p = 0.36). Rectal temperature increases were not different between conditions (43HR = 0.7°C, p < 0.001; 43RPE = 0.8°C, p < 0.001). V ˙ O2max decreased 15.6% (ES = 0.41) between 15RPE and 43RPE (p = 0.005), but it was not different over time during the HR-based trials [6.5%, ES = 0.16 (α adjusted for multiple comparisons = 0.0125) p = 0.03].

Conclusion: Maintaining target RPE and THR require considerable declines in work rate during HIIT in the heat, with ∼53% larger declines needed to maintain THR. The mitigation of cardiovascular drift in the THR trial may have contributed to the preservation of V ˙ O2max.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
5.00%
发文量
2608
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Physiology is a leading journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research on the physiology of living systems, from the subcellular and molecular domains to the intact organism, and its interaction with the environment. Field Chief Editor George E. Billman at the Ohio State University Columbus is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信