Clinical effectiveness of dupilumab in CRSwNP: unaffected by baseline nasal polyp size in real-world settings.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Michael Habenbacher, Ulrich Moser, Ahmed Abaira, Peter Kiss, Clemens Holzmeister, Jakob Pock, Katharina Walla, Angelika Lang, Alexandros Andrianakis
{"title":"Clinical effectiveness of dupilumab in CRSwNP: unaffected by baseline nasal polyp size in real-world settings.","authors":"Michael Habenbacher, Ulrich Moser, Ahmed Abaira, Peter Kiss, Clemens Holzmeister, Jakob Pock, Katharina Walla, Angelika Lang, Alexandros Andrianakis","doi":"10.1007/s00405-025-09275-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the impact of baseline nasal polyp score (NPS) on the effectiveness of dupilumab treatment in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective observational study, 80 CRSwNP patients treated with dupilumab 300 mg biweekly at a tertiary referral center were stratified according to the baseline NPS into two groups: low-NPS (< 5) and high-NPS (≥ 5). Treatment outcomes were evaluated at the 6-month follow-up visit and compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups showed significant clinical improvements. The NPS decreased significantly in both low- and high-NPS groups, from a mean score of 3.2 to 0.8 and from 6.1 to 1.4, respectively (p < 0.001 for both). SNOT-22 scores improved significantly in both groups (p < 0.001 for both), though the reduction was greater in the high-NPS group (35.5 vs. 23.9, p = 0.018). There were no significant differences between low- and high NPS groups in proportions of NPS reduction of ≥ 1 (89% vs. 95%, p = 0.396) and clinically significant SNOT-22 improvement (= reduction > 12 or follow-up SNOT < 40; 80% vs. 86%, p = 0.544).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results suggests that dupilumab is effective in CRSwNP treatment, regardless of baseline nasal polyp size. Both small and large polyp groups showed significant improvements in NPS and patient-reported outcome measures. Future, prospective studies are warranted to validate these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":11952,"journal":{"name":"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology","volume":" ","pages":"3329-3334"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12122593/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-025-09275-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the impact of baseline nasal polyp score (NPS) on the effectiveness of dupilumab treatment in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP).

Methods: In this retrospective observational study, 80 CRSwNP patients treated with dupilumab 300 mg biweekly at a tertiary referral center were stratified according to the baseline NPS into two groups: low-NPS (< 5) and high-NPS (≥ 5). Treatment outcomes were evaluated at the 6-month follow-up visit and compared.

Results: Both groups showed significant clinical improvements. The NPS decreased significantly in both low- and high-NPS groups, from a mean score of 3.2 to 0.8 and from 6.1 to 1.4, respectively (p < 0.001 for both). SNOT-22 scores improved significantly in both groups (p < 0.001 for both), though the reduction was greater in the high-NPS group (35.5 vs. 23.9, p = 0.018). There were no significant differences between low- and high NPS groups in proportions of NPS reduction of ≥ 1 (89% vs. 95%, p = 0.396) and clinically significant SNOT-22 improvement (= reduction > 12 or follow-up SNOT < 40; 80% vs. 86%, p = 0.544).

Conclusions: Our results suggests that dupilumab is effective in CRSwNP treatment, regardless of baseline nasal polyp size. Both small and large polyp groups showed significant improvements in NPS and patient-reported outcome measures. Future, prospective studies are warranted to validate these findings.

dupilumab在CRSwNP中的临床疗效:不受现实环境中基线鼻息肉大小的影响。
目的:本研究旨在探讨基线鼻息肉评分(NPS)对慢性鼻窦炎合并鼻息肉(CRSwNP)患者dupilumab治疗有效性的影响。方法:在这项回顾性观察研究中,80例CRSwNP患者在三级转诊中心接受dupilumab 300 mg双周治疗,根据基线NPS分为两组:低NPS(结果:两组临床均有显著改善)。低NPS组和高NPS组的NPS均显著下降,平均评分分别从3.2分降至0.8分和从6.1分降至1.4分(p 12或随访SNOT)。结论:我们的研究结果表明,无论基线鼻息肉大小如何,dupilumab在CRSwNP治疗中是有效的。小息肉组和大息肉组在NPS和患者报告的结果测量方面均有显著改善。未来,有必要进行前瞻性研究来验证这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
537
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Official Journal of European Union of Medical Specialists – ORL Section and Board Official Journal of Confederation of European Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Head and Neck Surgery "European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology" publishes original clinical reports and clinically relevant experimental studies, as well as short communications presenting new results of special interest. With peer review by a respected international editorial board and prompt English-language publication, the journal provides rapid dissemination of information by authors from around the world. This particular feature makes it the journal of choice for readers who want to be informed about the continuing state of the art concerning basic sciences and the diagnosis and management of diseases of the head and neck on an international level. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology was founded in 1864 as "Archiv für Ohrenheilkunde" by A. von Tröltsch, A. Politzer and H. Schwartze.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信