Long-term effect of repeated low-level red light therapy on myopia control: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Saif Ullah, Muhammad Farooq Umer, Suriyakala Perumal Chandran
{"title":"Long-term effect of repeated low-level red light therapy on myopia control: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Saif Ullah, Muhammad Farooq Umer, Suriyakala Perumal Chandran","doi":"10.1177/11206721251314541","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Myopia is a refractive error where distant objects are not clearly seen and appear blurred. Goal of this study was to evaluate long-term effectiveness of Repeated Low-Level Red Light (RLRL) therapy for children with myopia, which primarily focused on Axial length (AL) and Spherical Equivalent Refraction (SER) as primary endpoints.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The research compared outcomes between RLRL treatment with Single Vision Spectacles (SVS) for childhood myopia management. We performed a systematic literature search in the PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases using \"Myopia\" and \" Repeated Low-Level Red Light \". Mean differences (MD) were estimated and the effects of therapies measured. Publication bias and heterogeneity analysis were carried out by Inverted Precision Effect Test-Precision Effect Estimate Standard Error (PET-PEESE) (and subsequent Search Sequential Analysis) and Tau test. Bayesian meta-analysis was performed using Jaffrey Amazing Statistical Package (JASP).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This meta-analysis comprised 1,714 participants: 824 in RLRL and 890 in SVS group. Pooled effect size for AL reduction was 0.953 ± 0.294, (95% credible interval (CI) 0.775 to 0.980). Pooled effect size for SER reduction was 1.521 ± 0.662 (95% CI 0.102 to 2.736). PET-PEESE analysis revealed no significant publication bias (<i>p</i>-value 0.407). Random effects models were employed for presence of significant heterogeneity (3.9 and 5.7 for AL; 5.7 for SER), alongside degree of variation (0.828 & 1.665) for Tau (τ), which estimates the between-study variance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Long-term observations indicate that RLRL treatment significantly influences myopia management, leading to considerable reductions in both AL and SER. Additional research is essential to investigate potential long-term rebound effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":12000,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":"11206721251314541"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11206721251314541","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Myopia is a refractive error where distant objects are not clearly seen and appear blurred. Goal of this study was to evaluate long-term effectiveness of Repeated Low-Level Red Light (RLRL) therapy for children with myopia, which primarily focused on Axial length (AL) and Spherical Equivalent Refraction (SER) as primary endpoints.

Methods: The research compared outcomes between RLRL treatment with Single Vision Spectacles (SVS) for childhood myopia management. We performed a systematic literature search in the PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases using "Myopia" and " Repeated Low-Level Red Light ". Mean differences (MD) were estimated and the effects of therapies measured. Publication bias and heterogeneity analysis were carried out by Inverted Precision Effect Test-Precision Effect Estimate Standard Error (PET-PEESE) (and subsequent Search Sequential Analysis) and Tau test. Bayesian meta-analysis was performed using Jaffrey Amazing Statistical Package (JASP).

Results: This meta-analysis comprised 1,714 participants: 824 in RLRL and 890 in SVS group. Pooled effect size for AL reduction was 0.953 ± 0.294, (95% credible interval (CI) 0.775 to 0.980). Pooled effect size for SER reduction was 1.521 ± 0.662 (95% CI 0.102 to 2.736). PET-PEESE analysis revealed no significant publication bias (p-value 0.407). Random effects models were employed for presence of significant heterogeneity (3.9 and 5.7 for AL; 5.7 for SER), alongside degree of variation (0.828 & 1.665) for Tau (τ), which estimates the between-study variance.

Conclusion: Long-term observations indicate that RLRL treatment significantly influences myopia management, leading to considerable reductions in both AL and SER. Additional research is essential to investigate potential long-term rebound effects.

反复低强度红光治疗对近视控制的长期影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
近视是一种屈光不正,远处的物体看不清楚,模糊不清。本研究的目的是评估重复低水平红光(RLRL)治疗儿童近视的长期疗效,主要以轴长(AL)和球面等效折射(SER)为主要终点。方法:比较RLRL治疗与单视力眼镜(SVS)治疗儿童近视的效果。我们使用“Myopia”和“repeat Low-Level Red Light”在PubMed、Embase和Cochrane数据库中进行了系统的文献检索。估计平均差异(MD)并测量治疗效果。发表偏倚和异质性分析采用反向精度效应检验-精度效应估计标准误差(PET-PEESE)(及随后的搜索序列分析)和Tau检验。采用Jaffrey Amazing Statistical Package (JASP)进行贝叶斯元分析。结果:本荟萃分析共纳入1,714名参与者:RLRL组824人,SVS组890人。AL降低的合并效应量为0.953±0.294(95%可信区间(CI) 0.775 ~ 0.980)。SER降低的合并效应量为1.521±0.662 (95% CI 0.102 ~ 2.736)。PET-PEESE分析未发现显著的发表偏倚(p值0.407)。采用随机效应模型分析存在显著异质性(AL为3.9和5.7;5.7为SER),以及Tau (τ)的变异程度(0.828 & 1.665),其估计研究间方差。结论:长期观察表明,RLRL治疗显著影响近视管理,导致AL和SER显著降低。进一步的研究是必要的,以调查潜在的长期反弹效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
372
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Ophthalmology was founded in 1991 and is issued in print bi-monthly. It publishes only peer-reviewed original research reporting clinical observations and laboratory investigations with clinical relevance focusing on new diagnostic and surgical techniques, instrument and therapy updates, results of clinical trials and research findings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信