Long-term effect of repeated low-level red light therapy on myopia control: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
European Journal of Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-21 DOI:10.1177/11206721251314541
Saif Ullah, Muhammad Farooq Umer, Suriyakala Perumal Chandran
{"title":"Long-term effect of repeated low-level red light therapy on myopia control: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Saif Ullah, Muhammad Farooq Umer, Suriyakala Perumal Chandran","doi":"10.1177/11206721251314541","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionMyopia is a refractive error where distant objects are not clearly seen and appear blurred. Goal of this study was to evaluate long-term effectiveness of Repeated Low-Level Red Light (RLRL) therapy for children with myopia, which primarily focused on Axial length (AL) and Spherical Equivalent Refraction (SER) as primary endpoints.MethodsThe research compared outcomes between RLRL treatment with Single Vision Spectacles (SVS) for childhood myopia management. We performed a systematic literature search in the PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases using \"Myopia\" and \" Repeated Low-Level Red Light \". Mean differences (MD) were estimated and the effects of therapies measured. Publication bias and heterogeneity analysis were carried out by Inverted Precision Effect Test-Precision Effect Estimate Standard Error (PET-PEESE) (and subsequent Search Sequential Analysis) and Tau test. Bayesian meta-analysis was performed using Jaffrey Amazing Statistical Package (JASP).ResultsThis meta-analysis comprised 1,714 participants: 824 in RLRL and 890 in SVS group. Pooled effect size for AL reduction was 0.953 ± 0.294, (95% credible interval (CI) 0.775 to 0.980). Pooled effect size for SER reduction was 1.521 ± 0.662 (95% CI 0.102 to 2.736). PET-PEESE analysis revealed no significant publication bias (<i>p</i>-value 0.407). Random effects models were employed for presence of significant heterogeneity (3.9 and 5.7 for AL; 5.7 for SER), alongside degree of variation (0.828 & 1.665) for Tau (τ), which estimates the between-study variance.ConclusionLong-term observations indicate that RLRL treatment significantly influences myopia management, leading to considerable reductions in both AL and SER. Additional research is essential to investigate potential long-term rebound effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":12000,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":"1432-1444"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11206721251314541","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

IntroductionMyopia is a refractive error where distant objects are not clearly seen and appear blurred. Goal of this study was to evaluate long-term effectiveness of Repeated Low-Level Red Light (RLRL) therapy for children with myopia, which primarily focused on Axial length (AL) and Spherical Equivalent Refraction (SER) as primary endpoints.MethodsThe research compared outcomes between RLRL treatment with Single Vision Spectacles (SVS) for childhood myopia management. We performed a systematic literature search in the PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases using "Myopia" and " Repeated Low-Level Red Light ". Mean differences (MD) were estimated and the effects of therapies measured. Publication bias and heterogeneity analysis were carried out by Inverted Precision Effect Test-Precision Effect Estimate Standard Error (PET-PEESE) (and subsequent Search Sequential Analysis) and Tau test. Bayesian meta-analysis was performed using Jaffrey Amazing Statistical Package (JASP).ResultsThis meta-analysis comprised 1,714 participants: 824 in RLRL and 890 in SVS group. Pooled effect size for AL reduction was 0.953 ± 0.294, (95% credible interval (CI) 0.775 to 0.980). Pooled effect size for SER reduction was 1.521 ± 0.662 (95% CI 0.102 to 2.736). PET-PEESE analysis revealed no significant publication bias (p-value 0.407). Random effects models were employed for presence of significant heterogeneity (3.9 and 5.7 for AL; 5.7 for SER), alongside degree of variation (0.828 & 1.665) for Tau (τ), which estimates the between-study variance.ConclusionLong-term observations indicate that RLRL treatment significantly influences myopia management, leading to considerable reductions in both AL and SER. Additional research is essential to investigate potential long-term rebound effects.

反复低强度红光治疗对近视控制的长期影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
近视是一种屈光不正,远处的物体看不清楚,模糊不清。本研究的目的是评估重复低水平红光(RLRL)治疗儿童近视的长期疗效,主要以轴长(AL)和球面等效折射(SER)为主要终点。方法:比较RLRL治疗与单视力眼镜(SVS)治疗儿童近视的效果。我们使用“Myopia”和“repeat Low-Level Red Light”在PubMed、Embase和Cochrane数据库中进行了系统的文献检索。估计平均差异(MD)并测量治疗效果。发表偏倚和异质性分析采用反向精度效应检验-精度效应估计标准误差(PET-PEESE)(及随后的搜索序列分析)和Tau检验。采用Jaffrey Amazing Statistical Package (JASP)进行贝叶斯元分析。结果:本荟萃分析共纳入1,714名参与者:RLRL组824人,SVS组890人。AL降低的合并效应量为0.953±0.294(95%可信区间(CI) 0.775 ~ 0.980)。SER降低的合并效应量为1.521±0.662 (95% CI 0.102 ~ 2.736)。PET-PEESE分析未发现显著的发表偏倚(p值0.407)。采用随机效应模型分析存在显著异质性(AL为3.9和5.7;5.7为SER),以及Tau (τ)的变异程度(0.828 & 1.665),其估计研究间方差。结论:长期观察表明,RLRL治疗显著影响近视管理,导致AL和SER显著降低。进一步的研究是必要的,以调查潜在的长期反弹效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
372
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Ophthalmology was founded in 1991 and is issued in print bi-monthly. It publishes only peer-reviewed original research reporting clinical observations and laboratory investigations with clinical relevance focusing on new diagnostic and surgical techniques, instrument and therapy updates, results of clinical trials and research findings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信