Detection of Treponema pallidum DNA for diagnosis, resistance identification, and treatment outcome prediction in early syphilis among men who have sex with men.

IF 10.9 1区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Tzong-Yow Wu, Kuan-Yin Lin, Hsin-Yun Sun, Yu-Shan Huang, Wang-Da Liu, Li-Hsin Su, Wen-Chun Liu, Yi-Ching Su, Sui-Yuan Chang, Chien-Ching Hung
{"title":"Detection of Treponema pallidum DNA for diagnosis, resistance identification, and treatment outcome prediction in early syphilis among men who have sex with men.","authors":"Tzong-Yow Wu, Kuan-Yin Lin, Hsin-Yun Sun, Yu-Shan Huang, Wang-Da Liu, Li-Hsin Su, Wen-Chun Liu, Yi-Ching Su, Sui-Yuan Chang, Chien-Ching Hung","doi":"10.1016/j.cmi.2025.02.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We investigated the use of Treponema pallidum DNA (TP-DNA) for diagnosis, resistance identification, and treatment outcome prediction in early syphilis among men who have sex with men (MSM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MSM seeking care for sexually transmitted infections were prospectively enrolled from September 2021 to August 2024. Oral rinse, rectal swab, and urethral swab samples were tested for TP-DNA. Resistance-associated mutations (RAMs) to macrolides and tetracyclines were identified. Treatment responses were compared between syphilis cases with detected TP-DNA and those without.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 656 MSM enrolled, TP-DNA was most frequently detected in oral rinse samples (37.8% [193/510]), followed by rectal swab (20.2% [103/510]) and urethral swab samples (11.6%, 59/510) in clinic visits for early syphilis. TP-DNA was detected in 45.7% (233/510) of early syphilis cases and 0.7% (1/141) of cases without syphilis, resulting in a specificity of 99.3% (95%CI, 96.1-100%) and sensitivity 45.7% (95%CI, 41.3-50.1%). Secondary syphilis cases had the highest yield of TP-DNA detection (67.6% [117/173]), followed by primary (48.7% [19/39]) and early latent syphilis cases (32.6% [97/298]). The Ct values of TP-PCR in oral rinse samples were significantly lower in cases of higher rapid plasma reagin (RPR) titers (P<0.001). The rate of T. pallidum harbouring RAMs to macrolides was 58.9% (139/236), increasing over six-month intervals, from 32.4% (12/37) in 2021 to 77.8% (21/27) in 2023. Cases of detected TP-DNA had greater serologic responses to treatments than those without: 80.3% (159/198) vs 67.0% (156/233) at month 6 (P=0.002) and 84.1% (143/170) vs 70.3% (137/195) at month 12 (P=0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TP-PCR showed high specificity for the diagnosis of early syphilis, which correlated with RPR titers and treatment response, and lower Ct values in oral rinse samples correlated with higher RPR titers. The high prevalence of T. pallidum strains with RAMs to macrolides argues against using azithromycin to treat syphilis in Taiwan.</p>","PeriodicalId":10444,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Microbiology and Infection","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Microbiology and Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2025.02.017","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: We investigated the use of Treponema pallidum DNA (TP-DNA) for diagnosis, resistance identification, and treatment outcome prediction in early syphilis among men who have sex with men (MSM).

Methods: MSM seeking care for sexually transmitted infections were prospectively enrolled from September 2021 to August 2024. Oral rinse, rectal swab, and urethral swab samples were tested for TP-DNA. Resistance-associated mutations (RAMs) to macrolides and tetracyclines were identified. Treatment responses were compared between syphilis cases with detected TP-DNA and those without.

Results: Of 656 MSM enrolled, TP-DNA was most frequently detected in oral rinse samples (37.8% [193/510]), followed by rectal swab (20.2% [103/510]) and urethral swab samples (11.6%, 59/510) in clinic visits for early syphilis. TP-DNA was detected in 45.7% (233/510) of early syphilis cases and 0.7% (1/141) of cases without syphilis, resulting in a specificity of 99.3% (95%CI, 96.1-100%) and sensitivity 45.7% (95%CI, 41.3-50.1%). Secondary syphilis cases had the highest yield of TP-DNA detection (67.6% [117/173]), followed by primary (48.7% [19/39]) and early latent syphilis cases (32.6% [97/298]). The Ct values of TP-PCR in oral rinse samples were significantly lower in cases of higher rapid plasma reagin (RPR) titers (P<0.001). The rate of T. pallidum harbouring RAMs to macrolides was 58.9% (139/236), increasing over six-month intervals, from 32.4% (12/37) in 2021 to 77.8% (21/27) in 2023. Cases of detected TP-DNA had greater serologic responses to treatments than those without: 80.3% (159/198) vs 67.0% (156/233) at month 6 (P=0.002) and 84.1% (143/170) vs 70.3% (137/195) at month 12 (P=0.002).

Conclusions: TP-PCR showed high specificity for the diagnosis of early syphilis, which correlated with RPR titers and treatment response, and lower Ct values in oral rinse samples correlated with higher RPR titers. The high prevalence of T. pallidum strains with RAMs to macrolides argues against using azithromycin to treat syphilis in Taiwan.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
25.30
自引率
2.10%
发文量
441
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Microbiology and Infection (CMI) is a monthly journal published by the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. It focuses on peer-reviewed papers covering basic and applied research in microbiology, infectious diseases, virology, parasitology, immunology, and epidemiology as they relate to therapy and diagnostics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信