Christoforos K Travlos, Adario Chirgwin-Dasgupta, Emilie Trinh, Allan D Sniderman, Ahsan Alam, Thomas A Mavrakanas
{"title":"Prediction models for ischemic stroke and bleeding in dialysis patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Christoforos K Travlos, Adario Chirgwin-Dasgupta, Emilie Trinh, Allan D Sniderman, Ahsan Alam, Thomas A Mavrakanas","doi":"10.1093/ckj/sfae347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with kidney failure on maintenance dialysis have a high stroke and bleeding risk. Multivariable prediction models can be used to estimate the risk of ischemic stroke and bleeding. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to determine the performance of the existing models in patients on dialysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MEDLINE and Embase databases were searched, from inception through 12 January 2024, for studies of prediction models for stroke or bleeding, derived or validated in dialysis cohorts. Discrimination measures for models with c-statistic data from three or more cohorts were pooled by random effects meta-analysis and a 95% prediction interval (PI) was calculated. Risk of bias was assessed using PROBAST. The review was conducted according to the PRISMA statement and the CHARMS checklist.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight studies were included in this systematic review. All the included studies validated pre-existing models that were derived in cohorts from the general population. None of the identified studies reported the development of a new dialysis specific prediction model for stroke, while dialysis specific risk scores for bleeding were proposed by two studies. In meta-analysis of c-statistics, the CHA<sub>2</sub>DS<sub>2</sub>-VASc, CHADS<sub>2</sub>, ATRIA, HEMORR(2)HAGES and HAS-BLED scores showed very poor discriminative ability in the dialysis population. Six of the eight included studies were at low or unclear risk of bias and certainty of evidence was moderate.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The existing prediction models for stroke and bleeding have very poor performance in the dialysis population. New dialysis-specific risk scores should be developed to guide clinical decision making in these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":10435,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Kidney Journal","volume":"17 12","pages":"sfae347"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11841370/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Kidney Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfae347","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Patients with kidney failure on maintenance dialysis have a high stroke and bleeding risk. Multivariable prediction models can be used to estimate the risk of ischemic stroke and bleeding. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to determine the performance of the existing models in patients on dialysis.
Methods: MEDLINE and Embase databases were searched, from inception through 12 January 2024, for studies of prediction models for stroke or bleeding, derived or validated in dialysis cohorts. Discrimination measures for models with c-statistic data from three or more cohorts were pooled by random effects meta-analysis and a 95% prediction interval (PI) was calculated. Risk of bias was assessed using PROBAST. The review was conducted according to the PRISMA statement and the CHARMS checklist.
Results: Eight studies were included in this systematic review. All the included studies validated pre-existing models that were derived in cohorts from the general population. None of the identified studies reported the development of a new dialysis specific prediction model for stroke, while dialysis specific risk scores for bleeding were proposed by two studies. In meta-analysis of c-statistics, the CHA2DS2-VASc, CHADS2, ATRIA, HEMORR(2)HAGES and HAS-BLED scores showed very poor discriminative ability in the dialysis population. Six of the eight included studies were at low or unclear risk of bias and certainty of evidence was moderate.
Conclusions: The existing prediction models for stroke and bleeding have very poor performance in the dialysis population. New dialysis-specific risk scores should be developed to guide clinical decision making in these patients.
期刊介绍:
About the Journal
Clinical Kidney Journal: Clinical and Translational Nephrology (ckj), an official journal of the ERA-EDTA (European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association), is a fully open access, online only journal publishing bimonthly. The journal is an essential educational and training resource integrating clinical, translational and educational research into clinical practice. ckj aims to contribute to a translational research culture among nephrologists and kidney pathologists that helps close the gap between basic researchers and practicing clinicians and promote sorely needed innovation in the Nephrology field. All research articles in this journal have undergone peer review.