A quantitative weight-of-evidence review of preclinical studies examining the potential developmental neurotoxicity of acetaminophen.

IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 TOXICOLOGY
Daniel G Kougias, Evren Atillasoy, Michael D Southall, Anthony R Scialli, Sadaff Ejaz, Christopher Chu, Bamidele O Jeminiwa, Andrey Massarsky, Kenneth M Unice, Tammi H Schaeffer, Michael Kovochich
{"title":"A quantitative weight-of-evidence review of preclinical studies examining the potential developmental neurotoxicity of acetaminophen.","authors":"Daniel G Kougias, Evren Atillasoy, Michael D Southall, Anthony R Scialli, Sadaff Ejaz, Christopher Chu, Bamidele O Jeminiwa, Andrey Massarsky, Kenneth M Unice, Tammi H Schaeffer, Michael Kovochich","doi":"10.1080/10408444.2024.2442344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Acetaminophen [paracetamol; <i>N</i>-acetyl-<i>para</i>-aminophenol (APAP)] is an antipyretic/analgesic commonly used in the treatment of fever and mild to moderate pain, headache, myalgia, and dysmenorrhea. Recent literature has questioned the safety of acetaminophen use during pregnancy, with an emphasis on whether exposure to the developing nervous system results in behavioral changes consistent with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and/or other cognitive deficits in the offspring. No previous review has used a fully detailed, quantitative weight-of-evidence (QWoE) approach to critically examine the preclinical acetaminophen data with regards to potential developmental neurotoxicity (DNT). Following regulatory guidance, a QWoE framework using prespecified scoring criteria was developed consistent with previous approaches to characterize potential adverse DNT outcomes with considerations for biological relevance of the response to adverse outcomes (outcome score) and the strength of methods and study design (methods score). Considerations for the methods score included (1) experimental design, (2) details/reliability of measurement(s), (3) data transparency, and (4) translational/methodological relevance. Considerations for the outcome score included response-related (1) statistical significance, (2) dose-response, (3) relevance/reliability/magnitude, (4) plausibility, and (5) translational relevance, including consideration of systemic toxicity/hepatotoxicity and therapeutic and/or non-systemically toxic doses and durations of use. Application of this QWoE framework to the 34 <i>in vivo</i> studies identified that assess the potential DNT of acetaminophen resulted in 188 QWoE entries documented across 11 DNT endpoints: social behavior, stereotypic behavior, behavioral rigidity, attention/impulsivity, hyperactivity, anxiety-like behavior, sensorimotor function, spatial learning/memory, nonspatial learning/memory, neuroanatomy, and neurotransmission. For each endpoint, the mean outcome score and methods score were calculated for total entries and for entries segregated by sex to assist in determining data quality and potential adversity. Informed by all 188 entries, the QWoE analysis demonstrated data of moderate quality showing no consistent evidence of DNT in male and female rodents following exposure to acetaminophen at therapeutic and/or nonsystemically toxic doses. Although some of the DNT endpoints (behavioral rigidity, attention/impulsivity, spatial learning/memory, neuroanatomy, and neurotransmission) generally displayed a more limited dataset and/or relatively lower data quality, similar conclusions were drawn based on results indicating a lack of biological relevance and reliability of reported adverse effects. Overall, this QWoE analysis on the preclinical <i>in vivo</i> data demonstrates no consistent evidence of adverse effects following developmental exposure to acetaminophen at therapeutic and/or non-systemically toxic doses on the structure and function of the nervous system, including neuroanatomical, neurotransmission, and behavioral endpoints.</p>","PeriodicalId":10869,"journal":{"name":"Critical Reviews in Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"1-55"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Reviews in Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10408444.2024.2442344","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Acetaminophen [paracetamol; N-acetyl-para-aminophenol (APAP)] is an antipyretic/analgesic commonly used in the treatment of fever and mild to moderate pain, headache, myalgia, and dysmenorrhea. Recent literature has questioned the safety of acetaminophen use during pregnancy, with an emphasis on whether exposure to the developing nervous system results in behavioral changes consistent with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and/or other cognitive deficits in the offspring. No previous review has used a fully detailed, quantitative weight-of-evidence (QWoE) approach to critically examine the preclinical acetaminophen data with regards to potential developmental neurotoxicity (DNT). Following regulatory guidance, a QWoE framework using prespecified scoring criteria was developed consistent with previous approaches to characterize potential adverse DNT outcomes with considerations for biological relevance of the response to adverse outcomes (outcome score) and the strength of methods and study design (methods score). Considerations for the methods score included (1) experimental design, (2) details/reliability of measurement(s), (3) data transparency, and (4) translational/methodological relevance. Considerations for the outcome score included response-related (1) statistical significance, (2) dose-response, (3) relevance/reliability/magnitude, (4) plausibility, and (5) translational relevance, including consideration of systemic toxicity/hepatotoxicity and therapeutic and/or non-systemically toxic doses and durations of use. Application of this QWoE framework to the 34 in vivo studies identified that assess the potential DNT of acetaminophen resulted in 188 QWoE entries documented across 11 DNT endpoints: social behavior, stereotypic behavior, behavioral rigidity, attention/impulsivity, hyperactivity, anxiety-like behavior, sensorimotor function, spatial learning/memory, nonspatial learning/memory, neuroanatomy, and neurotransmission. For each endpoint, the mean outcome score and methods score were calculated for total entries and for entries segregated by sex to assist in determining data quality and potential adversity. Informed by all 188 entries, the QWoE analysis demonstrated data of moderate quality showing no consistent evidence of DNT in male and female rodents following exposure to acetaminophen at therapeutic and/or nonsystemically toxic doses. Although some of the DNT endpoints (behavioral rigidity, attention/impulsivity, spatial learning/memory, neuroanatomy, and neurotransmission) generally displayed a more limited dataset and/or relatively lower data quality, similar conclusions were drawn based on results indicating a lack of biological relevance and reliability of reported adverse effects. Overall, this QWoE analysis on the preclinical in vivo data demonstrates no consistent evidence of adverse effects following developmental exposure to acetaminophen at therapeutic and/or non-systemically toxic doses on the structure and function of the nervous system, including neuroanatomical, neurotransmission, and behavioral endpoints.

对对乙酰氨基酚潜在发育性神经毒性的临床前研究的定量证据权重评价。
对乙酰氨基酚(扑热息痛;n -乙酰-对氨基酚(APAP)是一种解热/镇痛药,常用于治疗发热、轻至中度疼痛、头痛、肌痛和痛经。最近的文献对怀孕期间使用对乙酰氨基酚的安全性提出了质疑,重点是暴露于发育中的神经系统是否会导致与后代的自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)、注意力缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)和/或其他认知缺陷一致的行为改变。以前没有文献综述使用完全详细的定量证据权重(QWoE)方法来严格检查对乙酰氨基酚有关潜在发育性神经毒性(DNT)的临床前数据。根据监管指导,QWoE框架使用预先指定的评分标准,与先前的方法一致,以表征潜在的不良DNT结果,并考虑到对不良结果的反应的生物学相关性(结果评分)和方法和研究设计的强度(方法评分)。方法评分的考虑因素包括(1)实验设计,(2)测量的细节/可靠性,(3)数据透明度,(4)翻译/方法相关性。结果评分的考虑因素包括反应相关的(1)统计学意义,(2)剂量-反应,(3)相关性/可靠性/量级,(4)合理性,(5)转化相关性,包括考虑全身毒性/肝毒性以及治疗和/或非全身毒性剂量和使用时间。将QWoE框架应用于34项体内研究,确定评估对乙酰氨基酚潜在DNT的结果是188个QWoE记录了11个DNT端点:社会行为、刻板行为、行为刚性、注意力/冲动、多动、焦虑样行为、感觉运动功能、空间学习/记忆、非空间学习/记忆、神经解剖学和神经传递。对于每个终点,计算总条目和按性别分离条目的平均结局评分和方法评分,以帮助确定数据质量和潜在的逆境。根据所有188个条目,QWoE分析显示中等质量的数据显示,在暴露于治疗和/或非系统毒性剂量的对乙酰氨基酚后,雄性和雌性啮齿动物没有一致的DNT证据。虽然DNT的一些端点(行为刚性、注意力/冲动性、空间学习/记忆、神经解剖学和神经传递)通常显示出更有限的数据集和/或相对较低的数据质量,但基于缺乏生物学相关性和报告不良反应可靠性的结果得出了类似的结论。总体而言,本QWoE对临床前体内数据的分析显示,没有一致的证据表明,在发育过程中暴露于治疗性和/或非全身性毒性剂量的对乙酰氨基酚对神经系统的结构和功能,包括神经解剖、神经传递和行为终点的不良影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
1.70%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: Critical Reviews in Toxicology provides up-to-date, objective analyses of topics related to the mechanisms of action, responses, and assessment of health risks due to toxicant exposure. The journal publishes critical, comprehensive reviews of research findings in toxicology and the application of toxicological information in assessing human health hazards and risks. Toxicants of concern include commodity and specialty chemicals such as formaldehyde, acrylonitrile, and pesticides; pharmaceutical agents of all types; consumer products such as macronutrients and food additives; environmental agents such as ambient ozone; and occupational exposures such as asbestos and benzene.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信