Efficacy and safety of vaginal suppositories containing combination of Natamycin and Lactulose in treatment of vulvovaginal candidiasis: international, randomized, controlled, superiority clinical trial (combination of Natamycin and Lactulose for treatment of vulvovaginal candidiasis).

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Oksana N Volkova, Elena V Amel'chenko, Oksana V Makeeva, Sergey A Tolmachev, Ekaterina A Lesovaya, Lefteris C Zacharia, Alexander V Dikovskiy
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of vaginal suppositories containing combination of Natamycin and Lactulose in treatment of vulvovaginal candidiasis: international, randomized, controlled, superiority clinical trial (combination of Natamycin and Lactulose for treatment of vulvovaginal candidiasis).","authors":"Oksana N Volkova, Elena V Amel'chenko, Oksana V Makeeva, Sergey A Tolmachev, Ekaterina A Lesovaya, Lefteris C Zacharia, Alexander V Dikovskiy","doi":"10.1186/s12905-025-03616-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of Natamycin + Lactulose vaginal suppositories (100 mg natamycin and 300 mg lactulose) (AVVA RUS JSC, Russia) in adult females with vulvovaginal candidiasis.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>An international, randomized, controlled, assessor-blinded clinical trial enrolled 218 females randomly distributed into three groups: Natamycin + Lactulose (92 patients), Lactulose (36 patients), and Pimafucin® (90 patients). The study drug and comparator drugs had an identical dosing regimen (one suppository intravaginally once a day at bedtime for six days). The study involved four visits to the study site with examination at Visits 2 and 3. The fixed-dose combination of Natamycin + Lactulose was superior to both comparator drugs in terms of the primary efficacy endpoint defined as the percentage of patients achieving a clinical recovery: the absence of symptoms of vulvovaginal candidiasis. At Visit 2, clinical recovery was reported in 81.6% of females in the Natamycin + Lactulose group compared to 42.9% and 62.3% of patients in the Lactulose and Pimafucin groups, respectively. The difference in proportions was 38.8% and 18.4%. In the Natamycin + Lactulose group, microscopic recovery was observed in 75.9% of patients at Visit 2 and in 90.8% of patients at Visit 3. In the Lactulose group, 45.7% and 74.3% subjects responded positively at Visits 2 and 3. In Pimafucin group, microscopic recovery was reported in 71.3% and 88.5% of patients at Visits 2 and 3, respectively, while no differences were observed between the Natamycin + Lactulose and Pimafucin groups at both visits. At Visit 3, the number of vaginal lactobacilli was significantly higher in the Natamycin + Lactulose group. In females with the low baseline content of vaginal lactobacilli, the combination drug under investigation increased the vaginal lactobacilli content to the reference values in 15.4% and 20.9% of patients at Visit 2 and Visit 3, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The fixed-dose combination Natamycin + Lactulose 100 mg + 300 mg vaginal suppositories (AVVA RUS JSC, Russia) demonstrated superior efficacy compared to 1) Pimafucin 100 mg and 2) Lactulose 300 mg vaginal suppositories in adult females with vulvovaginal candidiasis.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>NCT06411314, retrospectively registered on May, the 13th, 2024.</p>","PeriodicalId":9204,"journal":{"name":"BMC Women's Health","volume":"25 1","pages":"77"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11843759/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Women's Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-025-03616-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of Natamycin + Lactulose vaginal suppositories (100 mg natamycin and 300 mg lactulose) (AVVA RUS JSC, Russia) in adult females with vulvovaginal candidiasis.

Methods and results: An international, randomized, controlled, assessor-blinded clinical trial enrolled 218 females randomly distributed into three groups: Natamycin + Lactulose (92 patients), Lactulose (36 patients), and Pimafucin® (90 patients). The study drug and comparator drugs had an identical dosing regimen (one suppository intravaginally once a day at bedtime for six days). The study involved four visits to the study site with examination at Visits 2 and 3. The fixed-dose combination of Natamycin + Lactulose was superior to both comparator drugs in terms of the primary efficacy endpoint defined as the percentage of patients achieving a clinical recovery: the absence of symptoms of vulvovaginal candidiasis. At Visit 2, clinical recovery was reported in 81.6% of females in the Natamycin + Lactulose group compared to 42.9% and 62.3% of patients in the Lactulose and Pimafucin groups, respectively. The difference in proportions was 38.8% and 18.4%. In the Natamycin + Lactulose group, microscopic recovery was observed in 75.9% of patients at Visit 2 and in 90.8% of patients at Visit 3. In the Lactulose group, 45.7% and 74.3% subjects responded positively at Visits 2 and 3. In Pimafucin group, microscopic recovery was reported in 71.3% and 88.5% of patients at Visits 2 and 3, respectively, while no differences were observed between the Natamycin + Lactulose and Pimafucin groups at both visits. At Visit 3, the number of vaginal lactobacilli was significantly higher in the Natamycin + Lactulose group. In females with the low baseline content of vaginal lactobacilli, the combination drug under investigation increased the vaginal lactobacilli content to the reference values in 15.4% and 20.9% of patients at Visit 2 and Visit 3, respectively.

Conclusions: The fixed-dose combination Natamycin + Lactulose 100 mg + 300 mg vaginal suppositories (AVVA RUS JSC, Russia) demonstrated superior efficacy compared to 1) Pimafucin 100 mg and 2) Lactulose 300 mg vaginal suppositories in adult females with vulvovaginal candidiasis.

Trial registration: NCT06411314, retrospectively registered on May, the 13th, 2024.

纳他霉素与乳果糖联合阴道栓剂治疗外阴阴道念珠菌病的疗效与安全性:国际随机对照优势临床试验(纳他霉素与乳果糖联合治疗外阴阴道念珠菌病)
背景:本研究旨在评价纳他霉素+乳果糖阴道栓剂(100 mg纳他霉素+ 300 mg乳果糖)(AVVA RUS JSC,俄罗斯)治疗成年女性外阴阴道念珠菌病的疗效和安全性。方法和结果:一项国际性、随机、对照、评估盲的临床试验纳入了218名女性,随机分为三组:纳他霉素+乳果糖(92例)、乳果糖(36例)和匹马弗辛(90例)。研究药物和比较药物具有相同的给药方案(每天睡前一次阴道内栓剂,持续6天)。这项研究包括四次对研究地点的访问,并在第二次和第三次访问时进行检查。纳他霉素+乳果糖的固定剂量组合在主要疗效终点(实现临床恢复的患者百分比)方面优于两种比较药物:无外阴阴道念珠菌病症状。在第2次就诊时,纳他霉素+乳果糖组中81.6%的女性患者临床恢复,而乳果糖组和匹马葡素组分别为42.9%和62.3%。比例差异分别为38.8%和18.4%。在纳他霉素+乳果糖组,75.9%的患者在第2次就诊时显微镜下恢复,90.8%的患者在第3次就诊时显微镜下恢复。在乳果糖组,45.7%和74.3%的受试者在第二次和第三次访问时反应积极。Pimafucin组在第2次和第3次就诊时显微恢复率分别为71.3%和88.5%,而纳他霉素+乳果糖组和Pimafucin组在两次就诊时均无差异。在第3次访问时,纳他霉素+乳果糖组阴道乳酸杆菌数量显著增加。在阴道乳酸菌基线含量较低的女性患者中,联合用药使15.4%和20.9%的患者在第2次和第3次就诊时阴道乳酸菌含量达到参考值。结论:纳他霉素+乳果糖100 mg + 300 mg阴道栓剂(AVVA RUS JSC,俄罗斯)对成年女性外阴阴道念珠菌病的治疗效果优于1)匹马福素100 mg和2)乳果糖300 mg阴道栓剂。试验注册号:NCT06411314,追溯注册日期为2024年5月13日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Women's Health
BMC Women's Health OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
444
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Women''s Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the health and wellbeing of adolescent girls and women, with a particular focus on the physical, mental, and emotional health of women in developed and developing nations. The journal welcomes submissions on women''s public health issues, health behaviours, breast cancer, gynecological diseases, mental health and health promotion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信