Perioperative Mechanical Circulatory Support for Cardiac Assistance in Thoracic Surgery: A Scoping Review.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Viviana Teresa Agosta, Jacopo D'Andria Ursoleo, Alice Bottussi, Samuele Bugo, Fabrizio Monaco
{"title":"Perioperative Mechanical Circulatory Support for Cardiac Assistance in Thoracic Surgery: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Viviana Teresa Agosta, Jacopo D'Andria Ursoleo, Alice Bottussi, Samuele Bugo, Fabrizio Monaco","doi":"10.1111/aor.14973","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with pre-existing severe cardiovascular comorbidities are often deemed ineligible for potentially life-saving thoracic surgeries and are referred to other conservative therapies. However, this patient population may theoretically benefit from the timely perioperative implantation of temporary mechanical circulation support (tMCS) to both mitigate the surgical stress and stabilize hemodynamics. We performed a scoping review to summarize the evidence regarding the use of tMCS in thoracic surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic search across PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar from their inception, aided by a search string encompassing a combination of terms for the key research concepts: i) tMCS devices; ii) thoracic surgery procedures (except lung transplantation); and iii) the adult population.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen studies pertinent to the research question, which summarized data from 28 patients, were retrieved for inclusion. In 14 patients, tMCS implantation occurred as a \"pre-emptive\" strategy, while the remaining patients had tMCS implanted either intra and/or postoperatively as a \"bail-out\" strategy. Specifically, 14 patients required an intra-aortic balloon pump, 10 veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, two required a multidevice strategy, and one cardiopulmonary bypass. The relative risk analysis revealed that the mortality rate in the pre-emptive group was half that of the bail-out group. Additionally, the risk of both infectious and vascular complications was lower in the pre-emptive group compared to the bail-out tMCS strategy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found that the timely implantation of tMCS in thoracic surgery-either to mitigate patients' heightened cardiovascular risk or as a rescue strategy in the event of life-threatening surgical complications-may lead to better patient outcomes, as well as allowing them to undergo curative surgery with an acceptable safety profile, characterized by overall good survival rates and a low incidence of device-related complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":8450,"journal":{"name":"Artificial organs","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artificial organs","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aor.14973","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients with pre-existing severe cardiovascular comorbidities are often deemed ineligible for potentially life-saving thoracic surgeries and are referred to other conservative therapies. However, this patient population may theoretically benefit from the timely perioperative implantation of temporary mechanical circulation support (tMCS) to both mitigate the surgical stress and stabilize hemodynamics. We performed a scoping review to summarize the evidence regarding the use of tMCS in thoracic surgery.

Methods: We conducted a systematic search across PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar from their inception, aided by a search string encompassing a combination of terms for the key research concepts: i) tMCS devices; ii) thoracic surgery procedures (except lung transplantation); and iii) the adult population.

Results: Fifteen studies pertinent to the research question, which summarized data from 28 patients, were retrieved for inclusion. In 14 patients, tMCS implantation occurred as a "pre-emptive" strategy, while the remaining patients had tMCS implanted either intra and/or postoperatively as a "bail-out" strategy. Specifically, 14 patients required an intra-aortic balloon pump, 10 veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, two required a multidevice strategy, and one cardiopulmonary bypass. The relative risk analysis revealed that the mortality rate in the pre-emptive group was half that of the bail-out group. Additionally, the risk of both infectious and vascular complications was lower in the pre-emptive group compared to the bail-out tMCS strategy.

Conclusion: We found that the timely implantation of tMCS in thoracic surgery-either to mitigate patients' heightened cardiovascular risk or as a rescue strategy in the event of life-threatening surgical complications-may lead to better patient outcomes, as well as allowing them to undergo curative surgery with an acceptable safety profile, characterized by overall good survival rates and a low incidence of device-related complications.

背景:已有严重心血管合并症的患者往往被认为不符合接受可能挽救生命的胸腔手术的条件,而被转诊接受其他保守疗法。然而,理论上这类患者可以从围手术期及时植入临时机械循环支持(tMCS)中获益,以减轻手术压力并稳定血流动力学。我们对胸外科手术中使用临时机械循环支持系统的相关证据进行了范围界定综述:我们对 PubMed/MEDLINE、EMBASE、Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials、Web of Science、Scopus 和 Google Scholar 进行了系统检索,检索字符串包括以下关键研究概念的术语组合:i) tMCS 设备;ii) 胸外科手术(肺移植除外);iii) 成人人群:结果:共检索到 15 项与研究问题相关的研究,这些研究总结了 28 名患者的数据。其中 14 名患者作为 "先发制人 "策略植入了 tMCS,其余患者作为 "救命 "策略在术中和/或术后植入了 tMCS。具体来说,14 名患者需要主动脉内球囊泵,10 名患者需要静脉体外膜肺氧合,2 名患者需要多设备策略,1 名患者需要心肺旁路。相对风险分析表明,抢救组的死亡率是救助组的一半。此外,与保外手术相比,抢先手术组发生感染和血管并发症的风险更低:我们发现,在胸外科手术中及时植入 tMCS - 无论是为了减轻患者心血管风险的增加,还是作为出现危及生命的手术并发症时的抢救策略 - 都可能为患者带来更好的治疗效果,并使他们能够在可接受的安全性条件下接受根治性手术,其特点是总体存活率高,与设备相关的并发症发生率低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Artificial organs
Artificial organs 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
303
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Artificial Organs is the official peer reviewed journal of The International Federation for Artificial Organs (Members of the Federation are: The American Society for Artificial Internal Organs, The European Society for Artificial Organs, and The Japanese Society for Artificial Organs), The International Faculty for Artificial Organs, the International Society for Rotary Blood Pumps, The International Society for Pediatric Mechanical Cardiopulmonary Support, and the Vienna International Workshop on Functional Electrical Stimulation. Artificial Organs publishes original research articles dealing with developments in artificial organs applications and treatment modalities and their clinical applications worldwide. Membership in the Societies listed above is not a prerequisite for publication. Articles are published without charge to the author except for color figures and excess page charges as noted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信