Comparative evaluation of free radical scavenging activity and total metabolite profiles among 30 macrofungi species.

IF 5.1 3区 生物学 Q1 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Tetiana Krupodorova, Victor Barshteyn, Yusufjon Gafforov, Milena Rašeta, Tetiana Zaichenko, Yaroslav Blume
{"title":"Comparative evaluation of free radical scavenging activity and total metabolite profiles among 30 macrofungi species.","authors":"Tetiana Krupodorova, Victor Barshteyn, Yusufjon Gafforov, Milena Rašeta, Tetiana Zaichenko, Yaroslav Blume","doi":"10.1186/s40643-025-00841-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The high antioxidant content of mushrooms such as polyphenols, polysaccharides, carotenoids, ergothioneine, glutathione, vitamins, and other compounds, has sparked interest in their potential use in preventive and therapeutic medicine. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the antioxidant potential of various macrofungi by measuring 1,1-diphenyl-2-picryl-hydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging activity and quantifying two classes of compounds: phenolics (TPC) and polysaccharides, both endo- (IPS) and exopolysaccharides (EPS). Species-specific abilities to produce mycelium, polysaccharides, and polyphenols were observed under submerged cultivation without agitation over 14 days. Mycelium productivity (P<sub>M</sub>) ranged significantly from 292 ± 11 to 1110 ± 37 mg·L⁻<sup>1</sup>·day⁻<sup>1</sup>, with the highest values observed in Ophiocordyceps sinensis (1110 ± 37 mg·L⁻<sup>1</sup> ·day⁻<sup>1</sup>), Pleurotus djamor (1090 ± 14 mg·L⁻<sup>1</sup>·day⁻<sup>1</sup>), and Cordyceps militaris (1080 ± 90 mg· L⁻<sup>1</sup>·day⁻<sup>1</sup>). The DPPH inhibition values of the extracts varied from 4.30 ± 0.20 to 87.9 ± 0.80%, while TPC ranged from 0.35 ± 0.10 to 34.6 ± 0.80 mg GAE/g d.w. Lentinula edodes was the best source of produced IPS (10.3 ± 0.35 g·L<sup>-1</sup>), while Hypsizygus marmoreus exhibited the highest EPS content (2.24 ± 0.30 g·L<sup>-1</sup>). Overall, IPS levels across species were higher, ranging from 1.56 to 10.3 g·L<sup>-1</sup>. In half of the fungal species, the mycelium exhibited superior antioxidant activity compared to culture broth. However, in the majority (66.7%), TPC was higher in the culture broth than in the fungal mycelium. Distinct scavenging abilities and metabolite profiles were observed among different isolates. Notably, the mycelium of Fomitopsis pinicola and L. edodes showed the highest DPPH inhibition and TPC. The antioxidant activity and TPC varied depending on the culture medium, and solvents used. The highest DPPH inhibition (90%) and TPC (38.5 ± 0.40 mg GAE/g d.w.) were observed in the methanol (MeOH) extract of F. pinicola mycelium grown in Sabouraud dextrose medium. Similarly, MeOH and ethyl acetate (EtOAc) extracts demonstrated strong DPPH inhibition (over 87%), while the maximum TPC (40.0 ± 0.60 mg GAE/g d.w.) was detected in the water (H<sub>2</sub>O) extract of L. edodes mycelium cultivated in glucose-peptone-yeast medium. A positive correlation was found between TPC and antioxidant activity, with Pearson's coefficient of 0.6615 for fungal mycelium, 0.1192 for culture broth, and 0.8924 and 0.7143 for F. pinicola and L. edodes, respectively. Both fungal mycelium and culture broth exhibit significant potential as natural antioxidants. These can be applied in nutraceuticals, food products, and nutritional supplements, offering diverse health benefits. Additionally, this study is a pioneering exploration of Auriporia aurea, Hohenbuehelia myxotricha, Lepista luscina, Oxyporus obducens, and Pseudospongipellis litschaueri, highlighting their largely unexplored potential for antioxidant applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":9067,"journal":{"name":"Bioresources and Bioprocessing","volume":"12 1","pages":"13"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11845661/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioresources and Bioprocessing","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40643-025-00841-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The high antioxidant content of mushrooms such as polyphenols, polysaccharides, carotenoids, ergothioneine, glutathione, vitamins, and other compounds, has sparked interest in their potential use in preventive and therapeutic medicine. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the antioxidant potential of various macrofungi by measuring 1,1-diphenyl-2-picryl-hydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging activity and quantifying two classes of compounds: phenolics (TPC) and polysaccharides, both endo- (IPS) and exopolysaccharides (EPS). Species-specific abilities to produce mycelium, polysaccharides, and polyphenols were observed under submerged cultivation without agitation over 14 days. Mycelium productivity (PM) ranged significantly from 292 ± 11 to 1110 ± 37 mg·L⁻1·day⁻1, with the highest values observed in Ophiocordyceps sinensis (1110 ± 37 mg·L⁻1 ·day⁻1), Pleurotus djamor (1090 ± 14 mg·L⁻1·day⁻1), and Cordyceps militaris (1080 ± 90 mg· L⁻1·day⁻1). The DPPH inhibition values of the extracts varied from 4.30 ± 0.20 to 87.9 ± 0.80%, while TPC ranged from 0.35 ± 0.10 to 34.6 ± 0.80 mg GAE/g d.w. Lentinula edodes was the best source of produced IPS (10.3 ± 0.35 g·L-1), while Hypsizygus marmoreus exhibited the highest EPS content (2.24 ± 0.30 g·L-1). Overall, IPS levels across species were higher, ranging from 1.56 to 10.3 g·L-1. In half of the fungal species, the mycelium exhibited superior antioxidant activity compared to culture broth. However, in the majority (66.7%), TPC was higher in the culture broth than in the fungal mycelium. Distinct scavenging abilities and metabolite profiles were observed among different isolates. Notably, the mycelium of Fomitopsis pinicola and L. edodes showed the highest DPPH inhibition and TPC. The antioxidant activity and TPC varied depending on the culture medium, and solvents used. The highest DPPH inhibition (90%) and TPC (38.5 ± 0.40 mg GAE/g d.w.) were observed in the methanol (MeOH) extract of F. pinicola mycelium grown in Sabouraud dextrose medium. Similarly, MeOH and ethyl acetate (EtOAc) extracts demonstrated strong DPPH inhibition (over 87%), while the maximum TPC (40.0 ± 0.60 mg GAE/g d.w.) was detected in the water (H2O) extract of L. edodes mycelium cultivated in glucose-peptone-yeast medium. A positive correlation was found between TPC and antioxidant activity, with Pearson's coefficient of 0.6615 for fungal mycelium, 0.1192 for culture broth, and 0.8924 and 0.7143 for F. pinicola and L. edodes, respectively. Both fungal mycelium and culture broth exhibit significant potential as natural antioxidants. These can be applied in nutraceuticals, food products, and nutritional supplements, offering diverse health benefits. Additionally, this study is a pioneering exploration of Auriporia aurea, Hohenbuehelia myxotricha, Lepista luscina, Oxyporus obducens, and Pseudospongipellis litschaueri, highlighting their largely unexplored potential for antioxidant applications.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

对 30 种大型真菌的自由基清除活性和总代谢物特征进行比较评估。
蘑菇富含抗氧化剂,如多酚、多糖、类胡萝卜素、麦角硫因、谷胱甘肽、维生素和其他化合物,这引起了人们对它们在预防和治疗医学中的潜在用途的兴趣。因此,本研究旨在通过测定大型真菌对1,1-二苯基-2-picryl-hydrazyl (DPPH)自由基的清除能力和测定酚类化合物(TPC)和多糖(内do- (IPS)和外多糖(EPS))两类化合物的含量来评价其抗氧化能力。在不搅拌的潜水培养下,观察了菌丝体、多糖和多酚的物种特异性能力。菌丝体产量(PM)在292±11到1110±37 mg·L - 1·天毒血症之间变化很大,其中最高的是冬虫夏草(1110±37 mg·L - 1·天毒血症)、侧耳菇(1090±14 mg·L - 1·天毒血症)和蛹虫草(1080±90 mg·L - 1·天毒血症)。DPPH的抑制值为4.30±0.20 ~ 87.9±0.80%,TPC的抑制值为0.35±0.10 ~ 34.6±0.80 mg GAE/g d.w。EPS的最佳来源为香菇(10.3±0.35 g·L-1),最高的来源为土菇(2.24±0.30 g·L-1)。总体而言,物种间IPS水平较高,在1.56 ~ 10.3 g·L-1之间。在一半的真菌种类中,菌丝体表现出比培养液更强的抗氧化活性。但在大多数情况下(66.7%),培养液中的TPC高于真菌菌丝体。不同的菌株具有不同的清除能力和代谢物谱。值得注意的是,pinicola和L. edodes菌丝体对DPPH和TPC的抑制作用最高。抗氧化活性和TPC随培养基和溶剂的不同而变化。在Sabouraud葡萄糖培养基中生长的松菌菌丝体,甲醇(MeOH)提取物对DPPH的抑制作用最高(90%),TPC最高(38.5±0.40 mg GAE/g d.w.)。同样,MeOH和乙酸乙酯(EtOAc)提取物对DPPH的抑制作用较强(87%以上),而葡萄糖-蛋白胨-酵母培养基中培养的L. edodes菌丝体的水(H2O)提取物的TPC最高(40.0±0.60 mg GAE/g d.w.)。TPC与抗氧化活性呈显著正相关,真菌菌丝体的皮尔逊系数为0.6615,发酵液的皮尔逊系数为0.1192,松皮菌和白蜡菌的皮尔逊系数分别为0.8924和0.7143。真菌菌丝体和培养液都显示出作为天然抗氧化剂的巨大潜力。它们可以应用于营养品、食品和营养补充剂,提供多种健康益处。此外,本研究是对Auriporia aurrea, Hohenbuehelia myxotricha, Lepista luscina, Oxyporus obducens和Pseudospongipellis litschaueri的开创性探索,突出了它们尚未开发的抗氧化应用潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bioresources and Bioprocessing
Bioresources and Bioprocessing BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY-
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
118
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Bioresources and Bioprocessing (BIOB) is a peer-reviewed open access journal published under the brand SpringerOpen. BIOB aims at providing an international academic platform for exchanging views on and promoting research to support bioresource development, processing and utilization in a sustainable manner. As an application-oriented research journal, BIOB covers not only the application and management of bioresource technology but also the design and development of bioprocesses that will lead to new and sustainable production processes. BIOB publishes original and review articles on most topics relating to bioresource and bioprocess engineering, including: -Biochemical and microbiological engineering -Biocatalysis and biotransformation -Biosynthesis and metabolic engineering -Bioprocess and biosystems engineering -Bioenergy and biorefinery -Cell culture and biomedical engineering -Food, agricultural and marine biotechnology -Bioseparation and biopurification engineering -Bioremediation and environmental biotechnology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信