Water industry strategies to manufacture doubt and deflect blame for sewage pollution in England

Alex T. Ford, Andrew C. Singer, Peter Hammond, Jamie Woodward
{"title":"Water industry strategies to manufacture doubt and deflect blame for sewage pollution in England","authors":"Alex T. Ford, Andrew C. Singer, Peter Hammond, Jamie Woodward","doi":"10.1038/s44221-024-00370-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The water and sewerage companies (WaSCs) in England are majority-owned by a range of global investors. The industry is under intense scrutiny for widespread failure in its environmental performance, discharging 12.7 million monitored hours of untreated wastewater and sewage into English waterways between 2019 and the end of 2023. At the time of writing, multiple investigations by environmental and financial regulators are in progress, and regulatory oversight is under review by the recently formed Office for Environmental Protection. While limited monitoring hid the full extent of underperformance, we argue that the WaSCs have prolonged this environmental disaster through strategies that mirror those of other large polluting industries in the past. We test this hypothesis for the nine major WaSCs in England against a published framework of 28 ‘greenwashing/deception’ tactics of large industries. We identified 22 of these tactics that could be seen as disinformation, greenwashing and manufacturing doubt. The financial exploitation of water resources in England, alongside long-term degradation of infrastructure and ineffective regulation, raises globally important issues around water security, ethics and environmental stewardship. Much greater scrutiny of both industry performance and industry communication is required. In the past 5 years, a huge amount of untreated wastewater has been released into English waterways. An analysis of the communication used by the water utilities shows that they have employed strategies used by large polluting industries in the past, prolonging the consequences of this environmental disaster.","PeriodicalId":74252,"journal":{"name":"Nature water","volume":"3 2","pages":"231-243"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s44221-024-00370-y.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature water","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s44221-024-00370-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The water and sewerage companies (WaSCs) in England are majority-owned by a range of global investors. The industry is under intense scrutiny for widespread failure in its environmental performance, discharging 12.7 million monitored hours of untreated wastewater and sewage into English waterways between 2019 and the end of 2023. At the time of writing, multiple investigations by environmental and financial regulators are in progress, and regulatory oversight is under review by the recently formed Office for Environmental Protection. While limited monitoring hid the full extent of underperformance, we argue that the WaSCs have prolonged this environmental disaster through strategies that mirror those of other large polluting industries in the past. We test this hypothesis for the nine major WaSCs in England against a published framework of 28 ‘greenwashing/deception’ tactics of large industries. We identified 22 of these tactics that could be seen as disinformation, greenwashing and manufacturing doubt. The financial exploitation of water resources in England, alongside long-term degradation of infrastructure and ineffective regulation, raises globally important issues around water security, ethics and environmental stewardship. Much greater scrutiny of both industry performance and industry communication is required. In the past 5 years, a huge amount of untreated wastewater has been released into English waterways. An analysis of the communication used by the water utilities shows that they have employed strategies used by large polluting industries in the past, prolonging the consequences of this environmental disaster.

Abstract Image

水务行业制造怀疑和转移英国污水污染责任的策略
英国的供水和污水处理公司(WaSCs)由一系列全球投资者持有多数股权。该行业因其环境表现普遍不佳而受到严格审查,在2019年至2023年底期间,该行业向英国水道排放了1270万个监测小时的未经处理的废水和污水。在撰写本文时,环境和金融监管机构正在进行多项调查,最近成立的环境保护办公室(Office for environmental Protection)正在审查监管监督。虽然有限的监测掩盖了表现不佳的全部程度,但我们认为,wasc通过与过去其他大型污染行业类似的策略,延长了这场环境灾难。我们针对英国的9个主要wasc,对28个大型行业“漂绿/欺骗”策略的公开框架进行了这一假设的检验。我们确定了其中22种可以被视为虚假信息、洗绿和制造怀疑的策略。英国对水资源的金融开发,加上基础设施的长期退化和监管不力,引发了围绕水安全、道德和环境管理的全球重要问题。需要对行业表现和行业沟通进行更严格的审查。在过去的5年里,大量未经处理的废水被排放到英国的水道中。对水务公司使用的通讯进行的分析表明,它们采用了过去大型污染工业使用的战略,延长了这场环境灾难的后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信