Pilot implementation of an electronic diagnostic support tool (AiD-DST) designed to identify the cause(s) of delirium

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Elizabeth Leong, Stephane Chang, Kristi Yearwood, Eamonn Eeles, Stephanie Yerkovich, Carolina Ling, Andrew Teodorczuk, Nadeeka Dissanayaka
{"title":"Pilot implementation of an electronic diagnostic support tool (AiD-DST) designed to identify the cause(s) of delirium","authors":"Elizabeth Leong,&nbsp;Stephane Chang,&nbsp;Kristi Yearwood,&nbsp;Eamonn Eeles,&nbsp;Stephanie Yerkovich,&nbsp;Carolina Ling,&nbsp;Andrew Teodorczuk,&nbsp;Nadeeka Dissanayaka","doi":"10.1111/ajag.70000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective(s)</h3>\n \n <p>The identification of cause(s) of delirium remains a clinical challenge within medicine. Our group have previously successfully developed and tested the Aetiology in Delirium—Decision Support Tool (AiD-DST). The AiD-DST is designed to help medical professionals close the gap on the detection of cause(s) of delirium. Here, we report on use of AiD-DST in the real-world setting.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A real-world implementation study of the AiD-DST within a general medical ward of a metropolitan hospital was conducted over a 10-week period. A mixed method evaluation was performed based upon the RE-AIM Framework that incorporates reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation and maintenance of an intervention.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Reach: fifty-three out of 87 <b>(</b>61%) eligible doctors consented to participation in the study. Effectiveness: A mean of 4.3 diagnoses were generated per patient with no difference in frequency when compared with historical control (<i>z</i> = 1.36; <i>p</i> = .17). Average usability score was 5.86 (SD = 1.15) on a 7-point scale, with 93% of respondents being satisfied with the AiD-DST. Free text feedback comprised themes of accessibility, ergonomics, diagnostic accuracy and applicability of AiD-DST to related conditions. Implementation: Instrument completion rate was 98% (<i>n</i> = 49/50), with a median completion time of 90 s. Maintenance: Sixty-seven % of uses of AiD-DST occurred in the second half of the study (<i>p</i> = .3). Following the initiation period there was an increase in use (<i>r</i> = .79; <i>p</i> = 02).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Proof of principle was demonstrated for local implementation of a diagnostic support tool (AiD-DST).</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55431,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal on Ageing","volume":"44 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ajag.70000","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal on Ageing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajag.70000","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective(s)

The identification of cause(s) of delirium remains a clinical challenge within medicine. Our group have previously successfully developed and tested the Aetiology in Delirium—Decision Support Tool (AiD-DST). The AiD-DST is designed to help medical professionals close the gap on the detection of cause(s) of delirium. Here, we report on use of AiD-DST in the real-world setting.

Methods

A real-world implementation study of the AiD-DST within a general medical ward of a metropolitan hospital was conducted over a 10-week period. A mixed method evaluation was performed based upon the RE-AIM Framework that incorporates reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation and maintenance of an intervention.

Results

Reach: fifty-three out of 87 (61%) eligible doctors consented to participation in the study. Effectiveness: A mean of 4.3 diagnoses were generated per patient with no difference in frequency when compared with historical control (z = 1.36; p = .17). Average usability score was 5.86 (SD = 1.15) on a 7-point scale, with 93% of respondents being satisfied with the AiD-DST. Free text feedback comprised themes of accessibility, ergonomics, diagnostic accuracy and applicability of AiD-DST to related conditions. Implementation: Instrument completion rate was 98% (n = 49/50), with a median completion time of 90 s. Maintenance: Sixty-seven % of uses of AiD-DST occurred in the second half of the study (p = .3). Following the initiation period there was an increase in use (r = .79; p = 02).

Conclusion

Proof of principle was demonstrated for local implementation of a diagnostic support tool (AiD-DST).

Abstract Image

试点实施电子诊断支持工具(AiD-DST),旨在确定谵妄的原因
目的:确定谵妄的病因仍然是医学领域的临床挑战。我们小组之前已经成功开发并测试了谵妄决策支持工具(AiD-DST)的病因学。AiD-DST旨在帮助医疗专业人员缩小对谵妄原因检测的差距。在这里,我们报告了在现实环境中使用AiD-DST。方法在某城市医院普通病房进行为期10周的艾滋病- dst实际实施研究。基于RE-AIM框架进行混合方法评估,该框架结合了干预措施的覆盖范围、有效性、采用、实施和维护。结果:87名符合条件的医生中有53名(61%)同意参加研究。有效性:与历史对照组相比,平均每位患者产生4.3例诊断,频率无差异(z = 1.36;p = .17)。平均可用性得分为5.86 (SD = 1.15),在7分制中,93%的受访者对AiD-DST感到满意。免费文本反馈包括可访问性、人体工程学、诊断准确性和AiD-DST对相关条件的适用性等主题。实施:仪器完成率为98% (n = 49/50),中位完成时间为90秒。维持:67%的AiD-DST使用发生在研究的后半段(p = .3)。起始期后,使用增加(r = 0.79;p = 02)。结论诊断辅助工具(AiD-DST)的局部应用证明了其原理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Australasian Journal on Ageing
Australasian Journal on Ageing 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
114
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australasian Journal on Ageing is a peer reviewed journal, which publishes original work in any area of gerontology and geriatric medicine. It welcomes international submissions, particularly from authors in the Asia Pacific region.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信