Advanced Exergy Analysis and Performance Ranking of Components of a Combined Cycle Power Plant

IF 0.9 Q4 ENERGY & FUELS
Uchenna G. Azubuike, Howard O. Njoku, Mkpamdi N. Eke, Onyemaechi V. Ekechukwu
{"title":"Advanced Exergy Analysis and Performance Ranking of Components of a Combined Cycle Power Plant","authors":"Uchenna G. Azubuike,&nbsp;Howard O. Njoku,&nbsp;Mkpamdi N. Eke,&nbsp;Onyemaechi V. Ekechukwu","doi":"10.1134/S0040601524700642","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>As conventional exergy analyses do not reveal the exergy destruction rates in a thermal system component caused by inefficiencies of interconnected components, actual potentials for improving the component performances cannot be provided by such analyses. This study analyses a combined-cycle gas turbine power plant using advanced exergy analysis methodologies, which address the shortcomings of conventional exergy analysis by evaluating the exergy destruction rates that are endogenous and exogenous, avoidable and unavoidable. Avoidable exergy destruction rates in the entire plant were found to be 31% of the total exergy destruction rates, indicating a significant potential for improving the plant. Exergy destruction rates for most of the plant components were largely endogenous (95.2%), signifying that contributions of cross-component interactions were limited. Avoidable endogenous exergy destruction rates account for 28.4% of the overall exergy destruction rates in the plant, while avoidable exogenous exergy destruction rates account for 2.1%. A component-level ranking of the plant components ranked the pumps in the plant as first for improvement whereas the highest priority was allocated to the combustion chambers (CC) by a plant-level ranking. A parametric study of the influence of CC operating conditions on the plant’s performance showed that CC operating temperatures more significantly affected plant exergy destruction rates than the CC operating pressures.</p>","PeriodicalId":799,"journal":{"name":"Thermal Engineering","volume":"72 1","pages":"17 - 31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thermal Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S0040601524700642","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As conventional exergy analyses do not reveal the exergy destruction rates in a thermal system component caused by inefficiencies of interconnected components, actual potentials for improving the component performances cannot be provided by such analyses. This study analyses a combined-cycle gas turbine power plant using advanced exergy analysis methodologies, which address the shortcomings of conventional exergy analysis by evaluating the exergy destruction rates that are endogenous and exogenous, avoidable and unavoidable. Avoidable exergy destruction rates in the entire plant were found to be 31% of the total exergy destruction rates, indicating a significant potential for improving the plant. Exergy destruction rates for most of the plant components were largely endogenous (95.2%), signifying that contributions of cross-component interactions were limited. Avoidable endogenous exergy destruction rates account for 28.4% of the overall exergy destruction rates in the plant, while avoidable exogenous exergy destruction rates account for 2.1%. A component-level ranking of the plant components ranked the pumps in the plant as first for improvement whereas the highest priority was allocated to the combustion chambers (CC) by a plant-level ranking. A parametric study of the influence of CC operating conditions on the plant’s performance showed that CC operating temperatures more significantly affected plant exergy destruction rates than the CC operating pressures.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
20.00%
发文量
94
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信