Shangqi Xu , Meng Na , Yuqing Miao , Chunjie Tian , Jihai Zhou , Xia Liu
{"title":"Responses of methane emissions to global wetland restoration and influencing factors","authors":"Shangqi Xu , Meng Na , Yuqing Miao , Chunjie Tian , Jihai Zhou , Xia Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.agrformet.2025.110459","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Wetlands are among the largest sources of methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) on Earth. To restore degraded ecological functions, wetland restoration has been implemented worldwide, but its impact on CH<sub>4</sub> emissions remains poorly understood. This study conducted a comprehensive global meta-analysis, integrating data from 59 field studies, to assess CH<sub>4</sub> emission responses to wetland restoration and identify key influencing factors through subgroup analyses and structural equation modeling (SEM). Our results indicated that CH<sub>4</sub> emissions increased by 122.3 % after wetland restoration compared to disturbed wetlands but remained 21.17 % lower than those of natural wetlands. Across all subgroup analyses, CH<sub>4</sub> emissions of restored wetlands were neither significantly lower than those of disturbed wetlands nor significantly higher than those of natural wetlands. The total greenhouse gas emissions of restored wetlands were not higher than those of disturbed wetlands but were significantly lower than those of natural wetlands (−22.92 %), primarily influenced by CH<sub>4</sub> and CO<sub>2</sub> emissions. CH<sub>4</sub> emissions were particularly sensitive to disturbance and restoration in freshwater wetlands, peatlands, and wetlands with seasonal flooding, high nutrient contents, or colder climates. In contrast, saline wetlands exhibited no significant changes in CH<sub>4</sub> emissions post-restoration. The SEM analysis identified restored hydrology, salinity, soil pH, restored type, and restored years as the dominant factors influencing CH<sub>4</sub> emissions, with climate exerting only indirect effects. These findings underscore the importance of rewetting (to water table depths of at least −15 cm), sustained restoration efforts (lasting at least 5 years), and the recovery of natural vegetation (rather than selective species planting) for effective wetland recovery. CH<sub>4</sub> emissions without these measures were significantly lower than those of natural wetlands. This study offers in-depth insights into CH<sub>4</sub> emissions following wetland restoration, providing a scientific foundation for wetland management strategies and CH<sub>4</sub> emission assessments under global change scenarios.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50839,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology","volume":"364 ","pages":"Article 110459"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168192325000796","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Wetlands are among the largest sources of methane (CH4) on Earth. To restore degraded ecological functions, wetland restoration has been implemented worldwide, but its impact on CH4 emissions remains poorly understood. This study conducted a comprehensive global meta-analysis, integrating data from 59 field studies, to assess CH4 emission responses to wetland restoration and identify key influencing factors through subgroup analyses and structural equation modeling (SEM). Our results indicated that CH4 emissions increased by 122.3 % after wetland restoration compared to disturbed wetlands but remained 21.17 % lower than those of natural wetlands. Across all subgroup analyses, CH4 emissions of restored wetlands were neither significantly lower than those of disturbed wetlands nor significantly higher than those of natural wetlands. The total greenhouse gas emissions of restored wetlands were not higher than those of disturbed wetlands but were significantly lower than those of natural wetlands (−22.92 %), primarily influenced by CH4 and CO2 emissions. CH4 emissions were particularly sensitive to disturbance and restoration in freshwater wetlands, peatlands, and wetlands with seasonal flooding, high nutrient contents, or colder climates. In contrast, saline wetlands exhibited no significant changes in CH4 emissions post-restoration. The SEM analysis identified restored hydrology, salinity, soil pH, restored type, and restored years as the dominant factors influencing CH4 emissions, with climate exerting only indirect effects. These findings underscore the importance of rewetting (to water table depths of at least −15 cm), sustained restoration efforts (lasting at least 5 years), and the recovery of natural vegetation (rather than selective species planting) for effective wetland recovery. CH4 emissions without these measures were significantly lower than those of natural wetlands. This study offers in-depth insights into CH4 emissions following wetland restoration, providing a scientific foundation for wetland management strategies and CH4 emission assessments under global change scenarios.
期刊介绍:
Agricultural and Forest Meteorology is an international journal for the publication of original articles and reviews on the inter-relationship between meteorology, agriculture, forestry, and natural ecosystems. Emphasis is on basic and applied scientific research relevant to practical problems in the field of plant and soil sciences, ecology and biogeochemistry as affected by weather as well as climate variability and change. Theoretical models should be tested against experimental data. Articles must appeal to an international audience. Special issues devoted to single topics are also published.
Typical topics include canopy micrometeorology (e.g. canopy radiation transfer, turbulence near the ground, evapotranspiration, energy balance, fluxes of trace gases), micrometeorological instrumentation (e.g., sensors for trace gases, flux measurement instruments, radiation measurement techniques), aerobiology (e.g. the dispersion of pollen, spores, insects and pesticides), biometeorology (e.g. the effect of weather and climate on plant distribution, crop yield, water-use efficiency, and plant phenology), forest-fire/weather interactions, and feedbacks from vegetation to weather and the climate system.