{"title":"Reviewing academic library policies for DEIAJ elements: Development and application of a policy review tool","authors":"Kawanna M. Bright , Yoko Okunishi","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Policies in academic libraries, whether formal or informal, external or internal, carry high levels of importance for the functioning of the library. But history and experience have shown that library policies are not always written for the benefit of everyone, and may negatively impact some library users and employees, especially those from marginalized or historically excluded populations. Until recently, very little focus has been given to review of academic library policies from a diversity, equity, inclusion, accessibility, or justice (DEIAJ) perspective. This case study focuses on the process utilized to develop, test, and apply a tool to reviewing academic library policies for DEIAJ elements. The process identified several insights, focusing on key elements of policy development either not fully addressed or in need of updates, including understanding who created and reviewed policies, when reviews were taking place, the need for a structured process, and awareness of subjectiveness. Recommended best practices in policy development and review are also shared. This case study supports academic libraries interested in engaging in policy review and identifying an approach and tool that will work for their contextual needs by thoroughly mapping out the process followed by the California State University, Dominguez Hills (CSUDH) University Library and sharing the review tool for wider use.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47762,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academic Librarianship","volume":"51 2","pages":"Article 103024"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Academic Librarianship","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0099133325000205","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Policies in academic libraries, whether formal or informal, external or internal, carry high levels of importance for the functioning of the library. But history and experience have shown that library policies are not always written for the benefit of everyone, and may negatively impact some library users and employees, especially those from marginalized or historically excluded populations. Until recently, very little focus has been given to review of academic library policies from a diversity, equity, inclusion, accessibility, or justice (DEIAJ) perspective. This case study focuses on the process utilized to develop, test, and apply a tool to reviewing academic library policies for DEIAJ elements. The process identified several insights, focusing on key elements of policy development either not fully addressed or in need of updates, including understanding who created and reviewed policies, when reviews were taking place, the need for a structured process, and awareness of subjectiveness. Recommended best practices in policy development and review are also shared. This case study supports academic libraries interested in engaging in policy review and identifying an approach and tool that will work for their contextual needs by thoroughly mapping out the process followed by the California State University, Dominguez Hills (CSUDH) University Library and sharing the review tool for wider use.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Academic Librarianship, an international and refereed journal, publishes articles that focus on problems and issues germane to college and university libraries. JAL provides a forum for authors to present research findings and, where applicable, their practical applications and significance; analyze policies, practices, issues, and trends; speculate about the future of academic librarianship; present analytical bibliographic essays and philosophical treatises. JAL also brings to the attention of its readers information about hundreds of new and recently published books in library and information science, management, scholarly communication, and higher education. JAL, in addition, covers management and discipline-based software and information policy developments.