Trade-offs between forage nutrition and ruminant carrying capacity in response to fertiliser application – Findings from the Park Grass long-term experiment (1860–2020)

IF 5.6 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
A.S. Cooke , J. Storkey , G.E. Acquah , M.R.F. Lee , M.J. Rivero
{"title":"Trade-offs between forage nutrition and ruminant carrying capacity in response to fertiliser application – Findings from the Park Grass long-term experiment (1860–2020)","authors":"A.S. Cooke ,&nbsp;J. Storkey ,&nbsp;G.E. Acquah ,&nbsp;M.R.F. Lee ,&nbsp;M.J. Rivero","doi":"10.1016/j.fcr.2025.109791","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context</h3><div>Rothamsted Research’s Park Grass Experiment, established in 1856, is the longest-running grassland study globally. Naturally regenerating grassland swards are grown in plots with varying applications of fertiliser including ammonium sulphate and sodium nitrate (at varying application rates), organic fertiliser, minerals (K, Mg, Na, P), and lime, which is mown twice a year. As the world’s most widely produced crop, grass is predominantly used to feed ruminants, however, the nutritional properties and carrying capacities of these plots have not previously been quantified.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The objective of this study was to characterise the nutritional profile of forage gathered from the Park Grass plots from 1860 to 2020 and the ruminant carrying capacity that the plots would support. The study further aimed to explore the trade-offs between productivity, forage nutritional quality, and biodiversity.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>Dried PGE herbage samples were taken from the Rothamsted sample archive at decade intervals from 1860 to 2020, representing a range of plot treatments. Proximate analysis and XRF elemental analysis were performed, and the data was used to estimate ruminant carrying capacity of plots based on metabolisable energy and crude protein requirements for production.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Fertiliser applications increased carrying capacity due to yield improvements but reduced crude protein while increasing cellulose and hemicellulose. Increased growth appeared to have a dilution effect on some essential minerals, particularly Ca, Mg, Mn, and P. Sodium nitrate produced higher carrying capacities per unit of nitrogen compared to ammonium sulphate or organic manure.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The findings highlight trade-offs in improved grasslands between forage quality, quantity, biodiversity, and management inputs. Results show that fertiliser applications enhance carrying capacity by increasing forage yield but potentially at the cost of reduced nutritional quality and species diversity. This study also provides the first comprehensive nutritional analysis of the Park Grass plots, revealing how historical fertiliser treatments influenced forage quality and ruminant carrying capacity over 160 years.</div></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><div>Studying the trade-offs and gradients within grassland systems is essential for understanding the balance between productivity and biodiversity. This study also contributes to the rich dataset available on the Park Grass Experiment, providing future opportunities and insight, whilst also highlighting the importance of long-term experimental studies in the agricultural and environmental sciences</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12143,"journal":{"name":"Field Crops Research","volume":"324 ","pages":"Article 109791"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Field Crops Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378429025000565","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context

Rothamsted Research’s Park Grass Experiment, established in 1856, is the longest-running grassland study globally. Naturally regenerating grassland swards are grown in plots with varying applications of fertiliser including ammonium sulphate and sodium nitrate (at varying application rates), organic fertiliser, minerals (K, Mg, Na, P), and lime, which is mown twice a year. As the world’s most widely produced crop, grass is predominantly used to feed ruminants, however, the nutritional properties and carrying capacities of these plots have not previously been quantified.

Objective

The objective of this study was to characterise the nutritional profile of forage gathered from the Park Grass plots from 1860 to 2020 and the ruminant carrying capacity that the plots would support. The study further aimed to explore the trade-offs between productivity, forage nutritional quality, and biodiversity.

Method

Dried PGE herbage samples were taken from the Rothamsted sample archive at decade intervals from 1860 to 2020, representing a range of plot treatments. Proximate analysis and XRF elemental analysis were performed, and the data was used to estimate ruminant carrying capacity of plots based on metabolisable energy and crude protein requirements for production.

Results

Fertiliser applications increased carrying capacity due to yield improvements but reduced crude protein while increasing cellulose and hemicellulose. Increased growth appeared to have a dilution effect on some essential minerals, particularly Ca, Mg, Mn, and P. Sodium nitrate produced higher carrying capacities per unit of nitrogen compared to ammonium sulphate or organic manure.

Conclusions

The findings highlight trade-offs in improved grasslands between forage quality, quantity, biodiversity, and management inputs. Results show that fertiliser applications enhance carrying capacity by increasing forage yield but potentially at the cost of reduced nutritional quality and species diversity. This study also provides the first comprehensive nutritional analysis of the Park Grass plots, revealing how historical fertiliser treatments influenced forage quality and ruminant carrying capacity over 160 years.

Significance

Studying the trade-offs and gradients within grassland systems is essential for understanding the balance between productivity and biodiversity. This study also contributes to the rich dataset available on the Park Grass Experiment, providing future opportunities and insight, whilst also highlighting the importance of long-term experimental studies in the agricultural and environmental sciences
背景Rothamsted 研究公司的公园草地实验(Park Grass Experiment)成立于 1856 年,是全球历史最悠久的草地研究项目。自然再生的草地种植在施用不同肥料的地块中,这些肥料包括硫酸铵和硝酸钠(施用量不同)、有机肥、矿物质(钾、镁、鈉、磷)和石灰,每年刈割两次。作为世界上产量最大的作物,草主要用于喂养反刍动物,但这些地块的营养特性和承载能力以前从未量化过。这项研究的目的是描述从 1860 年到 2020 年从公园草地上采集的牧草的营养成分以及这些地块的反刍动物承载能力。该研究还旨在探索生产力、牧草营养质量和生物多样性之间的权衡关系。方法从 1860 年到 2020 年,每隔十年从罗森斯特德样本档案中提取一次干燥的公园草牧草样本,代表一系列地块处理方法。结果施用化肥提高了产量,从而增加了承载能力,但在增加纤维素和半纤维素的同时降低了粗蛋白含量。与硫酸铵或有机肥相比,硝酸钠产生的每单位氮的承载力更高。结论研究结果突出表明了改良草地在牧草质量、数量、生物多样性和管理投入之间的权衡。研究结果表明,施肥可通过提高牧草产量来增强承载能力,但可能会以降低营养质量和物种多样性为代价。这项研究还首次对公园草地进行了全面的营养分析,揭示了在过去的160年中,肥料处理是如何影响牧草质量和反刍动物承载能力的。这项研究还为公园草地实验提供了丰富的数据集,为未来提供了机会和洞察力,同时也强调了长期实验研究在农业和环境科学中的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Field Crops Research
Field Crops Research 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
12.10%
发文量
307
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Field Crops Research is an international journal publishing scientific articles on: √ experimental and modelling research at field, farm and landscape levels on temperate and tropical crops and cropping systems, with a focus on crop ecology and physiology, agronomy, and plant genetics and breeding.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信