Modeling soil respiration: Seasonal variability and drivers in pine and broad-leaved forests of the lower Himalayas

IF 2.7 Q1 FORESTRY
S. Sivaranjani , Mriganka Shekhar Sarkar , Vijender Pal Panwar , Rajiv Pandey , Arun Pratap Mishra , Upaka Rathnayake
{"title":"Modeling soil respiration: Seasonal variability and drivers in pine and broad-leaved forests of the lower Himalayas","authors":"S. Sivaranjani ,&nbsp;Mriganka Shekhar Sarkar ,&nbsp;Vijender Pal Panwar ,&nbsp;Rajiv Pandey ,&nbsp;Arun Pratap Mishra ,&nbsp;Upaka Rathnayake","doi":"10.1016/j.tfp.2025.100804","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Soil respiration (Rs) is the largest source of carbon dioxide emissions from terrestrial ecosystems. While numerous studies have examined its environmental controls, significant knowledge gaps remain regarding the complex interactions between biotic and abiotic factors regulating Rs. These uncertainties hinder the accuracy of model predictions, limiting our ability to assess ecosystem carbon dynamics under changing environmental conditions. This study hypothesizes that, soil properties, microclimatic and environmental variables influence <em>Rs</em>, with variations across forest types. To explore this, the study aims to quantify <em>Rs</em> in two distinct forests and predict its relationship with environmental, microclimatic, and soil characteristics in <em>S. robusta</em> and <em>P. roxburghii</em> forests in the lower Indian Himalayas. Initially, we collected field data containing soil respiration, soil properties and environmental factors. The ANOVA analysis revealed that <em>Rs</em> rates across different seasons in Sal (<em>F</em> = 100.9, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.05) and Chir-Pine forests (<em>F</em> = 49.89, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.05) were found significantly different. Subsequently, we employed machine learning techniques with various training strategies to improve model accuracy and analyze the relationship between soil respiration and environmental factors. The RF machine learning algorithm was applied to estimate the relationship between Rs and other properties. The results showed that Random Forest model in Sal Forest achieved the lowest RMSE (2.11) and MAE (1.38), suggesting it had the best predictive performance than the others. The most influential parameter influencing Rs rates in Sal was Soil moisture, followed by Soil Temperature and Rainfall. Similarly, Chir-Pine Forest also performed best in the RF model with the lowest RMSE (1.455) and MAE (1.011), as well as the highest R<sup>2</sup> value (0.363). In Chir-Pine, the most influential parameter was RF followed by ST and SM. The present study concluded that combining forest-specific properties with climatic parameters may provide more robust predictions of <em>Rs</em>. The findings will enable the precise future accounting of temporal and spatial changes in carbon pools and atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> concentrations and their evolving trajectories concerning species composition in forests under climate change.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36104,"journal":{"name":"Trees, Forests and People","volume":"20 ","pages":"Article 100804"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trees, Forests and People","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666719325000329","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Soil respiration (Rs) is the largest source of carbon dioxide emissions from terrestrial ecosystems. While numerous studies have examined its environmental controls, significant knowledge gaps remain regarding the complex interactions between biotic and abiotic factors regulating Rs. These uncertainties hinder the accuracy of model predictions, limiting our ability to assess ecosystem carbon dynamics under changing environmental conditions. This study hypothesizes that, soil properties, microclimatic and environmental variables influence Rs, with variations across forest types. To explore this, the study aims to quantify Rs in two distinct forests and predict its relationship with environmental, microclimatic, and soil characteristics in S. robusta and P. roxburghii forests in the lower Indian Himalayas. Initially, we collected field data containing soil respiration, soil properties and environmental factors. The ANOVA analysis revealed that Rs rates across different seasons in Sal (F = 100.9, P < 0.05) and Chir-Pine forests (F = 49.89, P < 0.05) were found significantly different. Subsequently, we employed machine learning techniques with various training strategies to improve model accuracy and analyze the relationship between soil respiration and environmental factors. The RF machine learning algorithm was applied to estimate the relationship between Rs and other properties. The results showed that Random Forest model in Sal Forest achieved the lowest RMSE (2.11) and MAE (1.38), suggesting it had the best predictive performance than the others. The most influential parameter influencing Rs rates in Sal was Soil moisture, followed by Soil Temperature and Rainfall. Similarly, Chir-Pine Forest also performed best in the RF model with the lowest RMSE (1.455) and MAE (1.011), as well as the highest R2 value (0.363). In Chir-Pine, the most influential parameter was RF followed by ST and SM. The present study concluded that combining forest-specific properties with climatic parameters may provide more robust predictions of Rs. The findings will enable the precise future accounting of temporal and spatial changes in carbon pools and atmospheric CO2 concentrations and their evolving trajectories concerning species composition in forests under climate change.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Trees, Forests and People
Trees, Forests and People Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
7.40%
发文量
172
审稿时长
56 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信