Patient counselling on opioids by pharmacy technicians: A mixed-method study to explore facilitators and barriers

Elsemiek A.W. Jansen-Groot Koerkamp , Irem Simsek , Eman Badawy , Mette Heringa , Marcel L. Bouvy
{"title":"Patient counselling on opioids by pharmacy technicians: A mixed-method study to explore facilitators and barriers","authors":"Elsemiek A.W. Jansen-Groot Koerkamp ,&nbsp;Irem Simsek ,&nbsp;Eman Badawy ,&nbsp;Mette Heringa ,&nbsp;Marcel L. Bouvy","doi":"10.1016/j.pecinn.2025.100382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study investigates community pharmacy technicians' (PTs) counselling practices for patients prescribed opioids and identifies facilitators and barriers influencing their counselling behaviour.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A sequential exploratory mixed-method study involving interviews and a questionnaire was conducted among PTs, working in Dutch community pharmacies. PTs were recruited via professional networks, panels and social media. Inductive thematic analysis was performed for interviews. Descriptive statistics of questionnaires was performed and associations between behaviour of discussing dependency and background characteristics (1), barriers (2) and beliefs (3) were tested.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Nineteen topics emerged from 18 interviews. Out of 252 questionnaire-respondents, most PTs consistently discussed dosage and common side effects during the first opioid dispense. Although 92 % considered discussing opioid dependency important, only 62 % frequently performed it. Barriers included a lack of information about the indication (<em>p</em> = 0.012), lack of work agreements (<em>p</em> = 0.017), time (<em>p</em> = 0.022), feeling insecure (<em>p</em> = 0.041), less work experience (<em>p</em> = 0.025) and the belief that prescribers are responsible for discussing opioid dependency with patients (<em>p</em> = 0.018).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The high importance that PTs place on counselling patients on opioid dependency does not match their behaviour. To close this gap and optimize the role of PTs in promoting safe opioid use, organizational and competency-related barriers must be addressed. This includes clear work protocols, communication training and including the indication on opioid prescriptions.</div></div><div><h3>Innovation</h3><div>This research focuses on an underexplored group involved in patients' opioid management, crucial for designing effective interventions, as PTs frequently have direct patient contact.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74407,"journal":{"name":"PEC innovation","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100382"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PEC innovation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772628225000111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

This study investigates community pharmacy technicians' (PTs) counselling practices for patients prescribed opioids and identifies facilitators and barriers influencing their counselling behaviour.

Methods

A sequential exploratory mixed-method study involving interviews and a questionnaire was conducted among PTs, working in Dutch community pharmacies. PTs were recruited via professional networks, panels and social media. Inductive thematic analysis was performed for interviews. Descriptive statistics of questionnaires was performed and associations between behaviour of discussing dependency and background characteristics (1), barriers (2) and beliefs (3) were tested.

Results

Nineteen topics emerged from 18 interviews. Out of 252 questionnaire-respondents, most PTs consistently discussed dosage and common side effects during the first opioid dispense. Although 92 % considered discussing opioid dependency important, only 62 % frequently performed it. Barriers included a lack of information about the indication (p = 0.012), lack of work agreements (p = 0.017), time (p = 0.022), feeling insecure (p = 0.041), less work experience (p = 0.025) and the belief that prescribers are responsible for discussing opioid dependency with patients (p = 0.018).

Conclusion

The high importance that PTs place on counselling patients on opioid dependency does not match their behaviour. To close this gap and optimize the role of PTs in promoting safe opioid use, organizational and competency-related barriers must be addressed. This includes clear work protocols, communication training and including the indication on opioid prescriptions.

Innovation

This research focuses on an underexplored group involved in patients' opioid management, crucial for designing effective interventions, as PTs frequently have direct patient contact.
由药学技术人员对阿片类药物进行患者咨询:一项探索促进因素和障碍的混合方法研究
目的调查社区药学技术人员(PTs)对阿片类药物处方患者的咨询实践,并确定影响其咨询行为的因素和障碍。方法采用顺序探索性混合方法,对在荷兰社区药房工作的PTs进行访谈和问卷调查。PTs是通过专业网络、小组和社交媒体招募的。对访谈进行归纳主题分析。对问卷进行描述性统计,并检验讨论依赖行为与背景特征(1)、障碍(2)和信念(3)之间的关系。结果18次访谈共产生19个主题。在252名问卷调查对象中,大多数PTs在第一次阿片类药物分配期间一致讨论剂量和常见副作用。虽然92%的人认为讨论阿片类药物依赖很重要,但只有62%的人经常这样做。障碍包括缺乏有关适应症的信息(p = 0.012)、缺乏工作协议(p = 0.017)、时间(p = 0.022)、缺乏安全感(p = 0.041)、工作经验不足(p = 0.025)以及认为开处方者有责任与患者讨论阿片类药物依赖(p = 0.018)。结论精神科医师对患者阿片类药物依赖咨询的重视程度与其行为不匹配。为了缩小这一差距并优化PTs在促进阿片类药物安全使用方面的作用,必须解决与组织和能力相关的障碍。这包括明确的工作规程、沟通培训以及包括阿片类药物处方的适应症。创新本研究的重点是参与患者阿片类药物管理的一个未被充分开发的群体,这对于设计有效的干预措施至关重要,因为PTs经常与患者直接接触。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PEC innovation
PEC innovation Medicine and Dentistry (General)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
147 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信