A novel acoustic emission screwdriver reduces surgeons´ cancellous screw stripping rate - A biomechanical study

IF 1.4 3区医学 Q4 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL

Clinical Biomechanics Pub Date : 2025-02-19 DOI:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2025.106467

Bryan Joseph Wright , Stephen Grigg , John McCrory , Rhys Pullin , Jan Egil Brattgjerd

{"title":"A novel acoustic emission screwdriver reduces surgeons´ cancellous screw stripping rate - A biomechanical study","authors":"Bryan Joseph Wright , Stephen Grigg , John McCrory , Rhys Pullin , Jan Egil Brattgjerd","doi":"10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2025.106467","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Orthopedic surgeons refine their torque sensitive skills from tightening cancellous screws. Still, experienced surgeons exhibit surprisingly high screw stripping rates in osteopenic cancellous bone. Whether Acoustic-Emission technology, detecting energy waves from microstructural damage during screw purchase, can reduce these rates is unclear. Our aim was to evaluate if surgeons, irrespective of their experience, reduced cancellous screw stripping rate by combining their skills with feedback from an innovative Acoustic-Emission screwdriver.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Thirteen orthopedic surgeons with 0–23 years´ experience inserted 468 large fragment cancellous screws through plates into synthetic osteoporotic bone. The 1st stage, surgeons tightened 9 screws each without Acoustic-Emission feedback. The 2nd stage, each tightened 18 screws using the Acoustic-Emission feedback modified screwdriver. The last stage, surgeons tightened 9 screws each, again without Acoustic-Emission feedback. A strain gauge on the screwdriver was used to verify screw stripping.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Surgeons stripped 36 out of 115 screws (31 %) in stage 1, 37 out of 227 screws (16 %) in stage 2, and 26 out of 114 screws (23 %) in stage 3. A significant reduced screw stripping rate was found in stage 2 compared to in stage 1 (<em>p</em> < 0.001). Neither the individual surgeon nor experience of the surgeon contributed to screw stripping probability in a mixed effect logistical regression model.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretations</h3><div>Acoustic-Emission technology is superior to the torque sensitive skills of surgeons, demonstrating its potential to assist surgeons in real time, regardless of their experience, in reducing screw stripping rates in cancellous bone.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50992,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Biomechanics","volume":"123 ","pages":"Article 106467"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268003325000397","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Orthopedic surgeons refine their torque sensitive skills from tightening cancellous screws. Still, experienced surgeons exhibit surprisingly high screw stripping rates in osteopenic cancellous bone. Whether Acoustic-Emission technology, detecting energy waves from microstructural damage during screw purchase, can reduce these rates is unclear. Our aim was to evaluate if surgeons, irrespective of their experience, reduced cancellous screw stripping rate by combining their skills with feedback from an innovative Acoustic-Emission screwdriver.

Methods

Thirteen orthopedic surgeons with 0–23 years´ experience inserted 468 large fragment cancellous screws through plates into synthetic osteoporotic bone. The 1st stage, surgeons tightened 9 screws each without Acoustic-Emission feedback. The 2nd stage, each tightened 18 screws using the Acoustic-Emission feedback modified screwdriver. The last stage, surgeons tightened 9 screws each, again without Acoustic-Emission feedback. A strain gauge on the screwdriver was used to verify screw stripping.

Findings

Surgeons stripped 36 out of 115 screws (31 %) in stage 1, 37 out of 227 screws (16 %) in stage 2, and 26 out of 114 screws (23 %) in stage 3. A significant reduced screw stripping rate was found in stage 2 compared to in stage 1 (p < 0.001). Neither the individual surgeon nor experience of the surgeon contributed to screw stripping probability in a mixed effect logistical regression model.

Interpretations

Acoustic-Emission technology is superior to the torque sensitive skills of surgeons, demonstrating its potential to assist surgeons in real time, regardless of their experience, in reducing screw stripping rates in cancellous bone.

查看原文本刊更多论文

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Clinical Biomechanics 医学-工程：生物医学

CiteScore

3.30

自引率

5.60%

发文量

189

审稿时长

12.3 weeks

期刊介绍： Clinical Biomechanics is an international multidisciplinary journal of biomechanics with a focus on medical and clinical applications of new knowledge in the field. The science of biomechanics helps explain the causes of cell, tissue, organ and body system disorders, and supports clinicians in the diagnosis, prognosis and evaluation of treatment methods and technologies. Clinical Biomechanics aims to strengthen the links between laboratory and clinic by publishing cutting-edge biomechanics research which helps to explain the causes of injury and disease, and which provides evidence contributing to improved clinical management. A rigorous peer review system is employed and every attempt is made to process and publish top-quality papers promptly. Clinical Biomechanics explores all facets of body system, organ, tissue and cell biomechanics, with an emphasis on medical and clinical applications of the basic science aspects. The role of basic science is therefore recognized in a medical or clinical context. The readership of the journal closely reflects its multi-disciplinary contents, being a balance of scientists, engineers and clinicians. The contents are in the form of research papers, brief reports, review papers and correspondence, whilst special interest issues and supplements are published from time to time. Disciplines covered include biomechanics and mechanobiology at all scales, bioengineering and use of tissue engineering and biomaterials for clinical applications, biophysics, as well as biomechanical aspects of medical robotics, ergonomics, physical and occupational therapeutics and rehabilitation.