{"title":"Investigating utility-based walking accessibility: New versus old development areas in Hong Kong","authors":"Jiaqi Liu, Zheng Liang, Yue Huai, Hong K. Lo","doi":"10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.02.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Walking accessibility is a fundamental component of urban design, which plays a significant role in creating livable, sustainable and inclusive cities. This study aims to investigate potential disparities in walking accessibility between new and old development areas. To achieve this, a utility-based walking accessibility measure is developed, incorporating the impacts of street-level walking attributes, the spatial distribution of points of interest (POIs), pedestrians' heterogeneous behavioral preferences and population distribution. Walking accessibility disparity or inequity among different age groups is further quantified using Gini coefficients and Theil indices. The comparative case study focuses on Kwun Tong, an old urban area, and Kai Tak, a new development area in Hong Kong. The results show that the new development area exhibits lower walking accessibility across all age groups and a higher level of inequity for young and middle-aged pedestrians compared to the old development area, while the inequity difference for the elderly is not significant. This disparity can be attributed to the concentration of POIs within a few business clusters and insufficient pedestrian facilities. Additionally, the elderly have the worst walking accessibility among the three age groups. The findings highlight the necessity to incorporate pedestrians’ diverse preferences in planning new development areas to create a pedestrian-friendly environment for all.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48378,"journal":{"name":"Transport Policy","volume":"165 ","pages":"Pages 97-106"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transport Policy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X25000617","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Walking accessibility is a fundamental component of urban design, which plays a significant role in creating livable, sustainable and inclusive cities. This study aims to investigate potential disparities in walking accessibility between new and old development areas. To achieve this, a utility-based walking accessibility measure is developed, incorporating the impacts of street-level walking attributes, the spatial distribution of points of interest (POIs), pedestrians' heterogeneous behavioral preferences and population distribution. Walking accessibility disparity or inequity among different age groups is further quantified using Gini coefficients and Theil indices. The comparative case study focuses on Kwun Tong, an old urban area, and Kai Tak, a new development area in Hong Kong. The results show that the new development area exhibits lower walking accessibility across all age groups and a higher level of inequity for young and middle-aged pedestrians compared to the old development area, while the inequity difference for the elderly is not significant. This disparity can be attributed to the concentration of POIs within a few business clusters and insufficient pedestrian facilities. Additionally, the elderly have the worst walking accessibility among the three age groups. The findings highlight the necessity to incorporate pedestrians’ diverse preferences in planning new development areas to create a pedestrian-friendly environment for all.
期刊介绍:
Transport Policy is an international journal aimed at bridging the gap between theory and practice in transport. Its subject areas reflect the concerns of policymakers in government, industry, voluntary organisations and the public at large, providing independent, original and rigorous analysis to understand how policy decisions have been taken, monitor their effects, and suggest how they may be improved. The journal treats the transport sector comprehensively, and in the context of other sectors including energy, housing, industry and planning. All modes are covered: land, sea and air; road and rail; public and private; motorised and non-motorised; passenger and freight.