Matthew Jones , Paul Moloney , Robin Hale , Ivor Stuart , Justin O'Connor , Zeb Tonkin
{"title":"More than the sum of their parts — Environmental flows increase fish movement and fishway functionality","authors":"Matthew Jones , Paul Moloney , Robin Hale , Ivor Stuart , Justin O'Connor , Zeb Tonkin","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2025.107566","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The ecology of riverine fish is intrinsically linked to attributes of the natural flow regime such as duration, timing, and magnitude. The flow regimes and hydrological connectivity of many rivers globally has, however, been severely altered by river regulation, detrimentally impacting fish populations. Environmental flows and fishways are increasingly being used to reinstate important aspects of the flow regime, improve instream connectivity, and recover fish populations. The present work examines the potential benefits that the combination of fishways and environmental flows may have in terms of greater overall environmental outcomes than fishways alone.</div><div>We used multiple lines of evidence to correlate fish movement through multiple fishways in three lowland Australian rivers with increases in discharge mainly driven by environmental flows. Specifically, fish movement rates (from PIT tagged fish and fishway trapping) were modelled against stream discharge and water temperature, while the internal hydraulics (turbulence, water velocity and discharge) of a low level (<3 m head) fishway was modelled over three different flow scenarios — low, medium, and high discharge — to document functional changes that improved fishway efficiency with increased discharge.</div><div>Fishway trapping and PIT tag data indicated that native fish movement increased with increases in discharge associate largely with environmental flows, and medium-large magnitude flow events resulted in a greater movement response. Environmental flows raised river levels and improved the internal hydraulics of one low-level vertical-slot fishway, specifically benefiting passage of the smallest fish species and size-classes. Management interventions, such as environmental flows and fishways, come at considerable cost and require empirical data regarding their benefits, yet the potential benefits of combining interventions is rarely quantified against key objectives. This study presents evidence demonstrating that environmental flows cue fish migration and improve fishway efficiency and thus promote functional fish populations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11490,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Engineering","volume":"214 ","pages":"Article 107566"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857425000540","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The ecology of riverine fish is intrinsically linked to attributes of the natural flow regime such as duration, timing, and magnitude. The flow regimes and hydrological connectivity of many rivers globally has, however, been severely altered by river regulation, detrimentally impacting fish populations. Environmental flows and fishways are increasingly being used to reinstate important aspects of the flow regime, improve instream connectivity, and recover fish populations. The present work examines the potential benefits that the combination of fishways and environmental flows may have in terms of greater overall environmental outcomes than fishways alone.
We used multiple lines of evidence to correlate fish movement through multiple fishways in three lowland Australian rivers with increases in discharge mainly driven by environmental flows. Specifically, fish movement rates (from PIT tagged fish and fishway trapping) were modelled against stream discharge and water temperature, while the internal hydraulics (turbulence, water velocity and discharge) of a low level (<3 m head) fishway was modelled over three different flow scenarios — low, medium, and high discharge — to document functional changes that improved fishway efficiency with increased discharge.
Fishway trapping and PIT tag data indicated that native fish movement increased with increases in discharge associate largely with environmental flows, and medium-large magnitude flow events resulted in a greater movement response. Environmental flows raised river levels and improved the internal hydraulics of one low-level vertical-slot fishway, specifically benefiting passage of the smallest fish species and size-classes. Management interventions, such as environmental flows and fishways, come at considerable cost and require empirical data regarding their benefits, yet the potential benefits of combining interventions is rarely quantified against key objectives. This study presents evidence demonstrating that environmental flows cue fish migration and improve fishway efficiency and thus promote functional fish populations.
期刊介绍:
Ecological engineering has been defined as the design of ecosystems for the mutual benefit of humans and nature. The journal is meant for ecologists who, because of their research interests or occupation, are involved in designing, monitoring, or restoring ecosystems, and can serve as a bridge between ecologists and engineers.
Specific topics covered in the journal include: habitat reconstruction; ecotechnology; synthetic ecology; bioengineering; restoration ecology; ecology conservation; ecosystem rehabilitation; stream and river restoration; reclamation ecology; non-renewable resource conservation. Descriptions of specific applications of ecological engineering are acceptable only when situated within context of adding novelty to current research and emphasizing ecosystem restoration. We do not accept purely descriptive reports on ecosystem structures (such as vegetation surveys), purely physical assessment of materials that can be used for ecological restoration, small-model studies carried out in the laboratory or greenhouse with artificial (waste)water or crop studies, or case studies on conventional wastewater treatment and eutrophication that do not offer an ecosystem restoration approach within the paper.