Individuals with minoritized and intersecting identities in the prevention of body image and eating disorder pathology: Grounding theoretical frameworks of resilience and risk

IF 13.7 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Rachel R. Rodgers , Ariel L. Beccia , Lauren M. Schaefer , Vivienne M. Hazzard , Natasha L. Burke
{"title":"Individuals with minoritized and intersecting identities in the prevention of body image and eating disorder pathology: Grounding theoretical frameworks of resilience and risk","authors":"Rachel R. Rodgers ,&nbsp;Ariel L. Beccia ,&nbsp;Lauren M. Schaefer ,&nbsp;Vivienne M. Hazzard ,&nbsp;Natasha L. Burke","doi":"10.1016/j.cpr.2025.102554","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Individuals with intersecting marginalized identities experience body image and eating pathology at disproportionately high rates. To date, research in this area has been limited by an absence of overarching and guiding frameworks to support hypothesis-driven research and interpretation of the findings. This constitutes an important barrier to the development of theoretically grounded intervention strategies. In this article, we review theoretical frameworks relevant to the investigation of body image and eating pathology among marginalized individuals using an intersectional lens and considering how processes of both risk and resilience unfold at multiple levels. We describe factors at the macrosystem (e.g., structural racism, capitalism, patriarchy), exosystem (e.g., food environment, social media, mass media), and microsystem (e.g., family, peers) levels. At the macrosystem level, we review critical race theories and those illuminating the role of systems that maintain power, privilege, and oppression, which describe how systemic discriminatory practices have led to marginalized individuals being neglected in efforts to conceptualize, identify, prevent, and treat body image and eating pathology. At the exosystem level, marginalized individuals experience heightened socioeconomic stressors and associated lack of access to resources that may impact body image and eating pathology. Furthermore, sociocultural theories focus on how visible marginalized identities are discriminated against, while white appearance ideals are upheld. At the micosystem level, we review sociocultural and minority stress theories that account for how interpersonal agents may perpetuate oppressive discourses and how marginalized individuals may experience negative interpersonal experiences that impact body image and eating pathology. We provide a comprehensive theoretical framework to guide future research on the distribution and determinants of inequities in body image and eating pathology among marginalized populations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48458,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology Review","volume":"117 ","pages":"Article 102554"},"PeriodicalIF":13.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Psychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272735825000200","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Individuals with intersecting marginalized identities experience body image and eating pathology at disproportionately high rates. To date, research in this area has been limited by an absence of overarching and guiding frameworks to support hypothesis-driven research and interpretation of the findings. This constitutes an important barrier to the development of theoretically grounded intervention strategies. In this article, we review theoretical frameworks relevant to the investigation of body image and eating pathology among marginalized individuals using an intersectional lens and considering how processes of both risk and resilience unfold at multiple levels. We describe factors at the macrosystem (e.g., structural racism, capitalism, patriarchy), exosystem (e.g., food environment, social media, mass media), and microsystem (e.g., family, peers) levels. At the macrosystem level, we review critical race theories and those illuminating the role of systems that maintain power, privilege, and oppression, which describe how systemic discriminatory practices have led to marginalized individuals being neglected in efforts to conceptualize, identify, prevent, and treat body image and eating pathology. At the exosystem level, marginalized individuals experience heightened socioeconomic stressors and associated lack of access to resources that may impact body image and eating pathology. Furthermore, sociocultural theories focus on how visible marginalized identities are discriminated against, while white appearance ideals are upheld. At the micosystem level, we review sociocultural and minority stress theories that account for how interpersonal agents may perpetuate oppressive discourses and how marginalized individuals may experience negative interpersonal experiences that impact body image and eating pathology. We provide a comprehensive theoretical framework to guide future research on the distribution and determinants of inequities in body image and eating pathology among marginalized populations.
在预防身体形象和饮食失调病理方面具有少数和交叉身份的个体:弹性和风险的基础理论框架
具有交叉边缘身份的个体经历身体形象和饮食病理的比例高得不成比例。迄今为止,由于缺乏总体和指导性框架来支持假设驱动的研究和对研究结果的解释,这一领域的研究受到限制。这构成了理论上有根据的干预策略发展的一个重要障碍。在这篇文章中,我们回顾了与边缘化个体身体形象和饮食病理调查相关的理论框架,使用交叉镜头,并考虑风险和弹性的过程如何在多个层面展开。我们描述了宏观系统(例如,结构性种族主义,资本主义,父权制),外部系统(例如,食品环境,社交媒体,大众媒体)和微观系统(例如,家庭,同伴)层面的因素。在宏观系统层面,我们回顾了关键的种族理论和那些阐明维持权力、特权和压迫的系统的作用的理论,这些理论描述了系统性歧视做法如何导致边缘化个体在概念化、识别、预防和治疗身体形象和饮食病理的努力中被忽视。在外系统层面,被边缘化的个体经历了更高的社会经济压力和相关资源的缺乏,这可能会影响身体形象和饮食病理。此外,社会文化理论关注的是,在白人外表理想得到维护的同时,可见的边缘身份是如何受到歧视的。在微观系统层面,我们回顾了社会文化和少数民族压力理论,这些理论解释了人际代理如何使压迫性话语永续,以及边缘化个体如何经历影响身体形象和饮食病理的负面人际体验。我们提供了一个全面的理论框架,以指导未来的研究分布和不公平的身体形象和饮食病理在边缘人群中的决定因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Psychology Review
Clinical Psychology Review PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
23.10
自引率
1.60%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: Clinical Psychology Review serves as a platform for substantial reviews addressing pertinent topics in clinical psychology. Encompassing a spectrum of issues, from psychopathology to behavior therapy, cognition to cognitive therapies, behavioral medicine to community mental health, assessment, and child development, the journal seeks cutting-edge papers that significantly contribute to advancing the science and/or practice of clinical psychology. While maintaining a primary focus on topics directly related to clinical psychology, the journal occasionally features reviews on psychophysiology, learning therapy, experimental psychopathology, and social psychology, provided they demonstrate a clear connection to research or practice in clinical psychology. Integrative literature reviews and summaries of innovative ongoing clinical research programs find a place within its pages. However, reports on individual research studies and theoretical treatises or clinical guides lacking an empirical base are deemed inappropriate for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信