Model-free parameters derived from intravoxel inherent motion combined with tumor aggressiveness indicators in predicting 5-year treatment outcome in NPC
Fan Yang , Wenjing Peng , Haoran Wei , Xiaolu Li , Xiaoduo Yu , Lin Li , Yanfeng Zhao , Lizhi Xie , Meng Lin , Hongmei Zhang
{"title":"Model-free parameters derived from intravoxel inherent motion combined with tumor aggressiveness indicators in predicting 5-year treatment outcome in NPC","authors":"Fan Yang , Wenjing Peng , Haoran Wei , Xiaolu Li , Xiaoduo Yu , Lin Li , Yanfeng Zhao , Lizhi Xie , Meng Lin , Hongmei Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.oraloncology.2025.107187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To evaluate the value of model-free parameters (virtual magnetic resonance elastography [vMRE] and signature index [S-index]) and tumor aggressiveness indicators (contralateral pharyngeal recess invasion [CPRI] and tumor growth type [TGT]) in forecasting 5-year treatment outcomes in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>A total of 106 patients were included in this study. Only two b-values were employed to calculate vMRE and S-index. Univariate and multivariate Cox analyses were conducted with clinical factors as confounding variables. Multivariate logistic analysis was used to construct multiple models. The additional value of CPRI and TGT was evaluated through net reclassification improvement index (NRI) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI). Model performance and robustness were evaluated.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The predictive performance of vMRE and S-index (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.620 ∼ 0.639) was comparable to that of model-based parameters (AUC: 0.570 ∼ 0.658, all P ≥ 0.366). CPRI and TGT independently predicted progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Combined models significantly outperformed than the TNM stage model (all P ≤ 0.002) and vMRE-based or S-index-based model (all NRI ≥ 0.105 and IDI ≥ 0.085) in terms of 5-year OS (AUC: 0.840 ∼ 0.843) and 5-year PFS (AUC: 0.786 ∼ 0.793). The combined model demonstrated robust performance through Hosmer-Lemeshow test, cross-validation (iteration = 1000), 7:3 validation (chronologically or randomly), and post-hoc subgroup analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The advent of vMRE and S-index has streamlined the clinical applications without compromising the value of IVIM technique. Incorporating CPRI and TGT has further enhanced the predictive performance.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical relevance statement</h3><div>Only two b-values are needed to calculate vMRE and S-index, which, along with CPRI and TGT, are pivotal in forecasting long-term survival in patients with NPC.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19716,"journal":{"name":"Oral oncology","volume":"162 ","pages":"Article 107187"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1368837525000168","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
To evaluate the value of model-free parameters (virtual magnetic resonance elastography [vMRE] and signature index [S-index]) and tumor aggressiveness indicators (contralateral pharyngeal recess invasion [CPRI] and tumor growth type [TGT]) in forecasting 5-year treatment outcomes in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).
Materials and Methods
A total of 106 patients were included in this study. Only two b-values were employed to calculate vMRE and S-index. Univariate and multivariate Cox analyses were conducted with clinical factors as confounding variables. Multivariate logistic analysis was used to construct multiple models. The additional value of CPRI and TGT was evaluated through net reclassification improvement index (NRI) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI). Model performance and robustness were evaluated.
Results
The predictive performance of vMRE and S-index (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.620 ∼ 0.639) was comparable to that of model-based parameters (AUC: 0.570 ∼ 0.658, all P ≥ 0.366). CPRI and TGT independently predicted progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Combined models significantly outperformed than the TNM stage model (all P ≤ 0.002) and vMRE-based or S-index-based model (all NRI ≥ 0.105 and IDI ≥ 0.085) in terms of 5-year OS (AUC: 0.840 ∼ 0.843) and 5-year PFS (AUC: 0.786 ∼ 0.793). The combined model demonstrated robust performance through Hosmer-Lemeshow test, cross-validation (iteration = 1000), 7:3 validation (chronologically or randomly), and post-hoc subgroup analysis.
Conclusion
The advent of vMRE and S-index has streamlined the clinical applications without compromising the value of IVIM technique. Incorporating CPRI and TGT has further enhanced the predictive performance.
Clinical relevance statement
Only two b-values are needed to calculate vMRE and S-index, which, along with CPRI and TGT, are pivotal in forecasting long-term survival in patients with NPC.
期刊介绍:
Oral Oncology is an international interdisciplinary journal which publishes high quality original research, clinical trials and review articles, editorials, and commentaries relating to the etiopathogenesis, epidemiology, prevention, clinical features, diagnosis, treatment and management of patients with neoplasms in the head and neck.
Oral Oncology is of interest to head and neck surgeons, radiation and medical oncologists, maxillo-facial surgeons, oto-rhino-laryngologists, plastic surgeons, pathologists, scientists, oral medical specialists, special care dentists, dental care professionals, general dental practitioners, public health physicians, palliative care physicians, nurses, radiologists, radiographers, dieticians, occupational therapists, speech and language therapists, nutritionists, clinical and health psychologists and counselors, professionals in end of life care, as well as others interested in these fields.