Implementation of Direct Admission to the Operating Room Procedure for Children Transported With Airway Emergencies

Q3 Nursing
Lauren G. Harkins BSN, RN , Erin M. Herstine MD , Philomena M. Costabile BSN, RN , Bridget Devlin BSN, RN , Pooja Bhatia BSN, RN, CEN , David E. Tunkel MD , Bruce L. Klein MD , Susanna Scafidi MD , Corina Noje MD
{"title":"Implementation of Direct Admission to the Operating Room Procedure for Children Transported With Airway Emergencies","authors":"Lauren G. Harkins BSN, RN ,&nbsp;Erin M. Herstine MD ,&nbsp;Philomena M. Costabile BSN, RN ,&nbsp;Bridget Devlin BSN, RN ,&nbsp;Pooja Bhatia BSN, RN, CEN ,&nbsp;David E. Tunkel MD ,&nbsp;Bruce L. Klein MD ,&nbsp;Susanna Scafidi MD ,&nbsp;Corina Noje MD","doi":"10.1016/j.amj.2024.11.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Children with airway emergencies, such as aspirated foreign bodies (FBs), who present to community emergency departments usually require expeditious transfer to centers with pediatric expertise. In 2018, our hospital's transport team implemented a multidisciplinary direct admission to the operating room (OR) protocol for children transferred for emergent surgical intervention, which bypassed typical hospital entry points. We aimed to assess its impact on time to definitive care and patient outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We performed a retrospective chart review of all patients aged ≤18 years with suspected aspirated FB transferred to our institution for emergent surgical intervention between July 1, 2013 and March 1, 2023. We determined whether they were taken to the OR post-transfer after first being evaluated in our pediatric emergency department/intensive care unit (Standard protocol) or transported directly to the OR by the transport team (OR Transport protocol). Demographics, transport/surgical times, and clinical data were compared between the groups using <em>t</em>-test and Mann-Whitney <em>U</em> test.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 27 children who met the inclusion criteria, 14 (51.9%) were transported via the Standard protocol and 13 (48.1%) via the OR Transport protocol. Demographics, referring hospital characteristics, time of transfer request, need for mechanical ventilation pretransport, and transport mode were not different; rates of critical care transports were higher for the OR Transport group than for the Standard group (<em>P</em> = .016). Compared with the Standard group, the OR Transport group had shorter median (interquartile range) times from transport arrival to start of surgery (8 [0-15.5] vs. 94.5 [25.75-148.75] minutes, <em>P</em> &lt; .001) and from transport dispatch to surgery (103 [64.25-144] vs. 179 [115.5-265] minutes, <em>P</em> = .035). Although not statistically significant, the OR Transport group had a lower hospitalization rate after the surgery compared with the Standard group (38.5% vs. 64.3%).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Implementation of a direct admission to the OR protocol seems to expedite definitive treatment and may be associated with a decreased need for hospitalization for children with airway FBs who require interhospital transport for emergent surgical intervention.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":35737,"journal":{"name":"Air Medical Journal","volume":"44 1","pages":"Pages 40-45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Air Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1067991X24002268","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Children with airway emergencies, such as aspirated foreign bodies (FBs), who present to community emergency departments usually require expeditious transfer to centers with pediatric expertise. In 2018, our hospital's transport team implemented a multidisciplinary direct admission to the operating room (OR) protocol for children transferred for emergent surgical intervention, which bypassed typical hospital entry points. We aimed to assess its impact on time to definitive care and patient outcomes.

Methods

We performed a retrospective chart review of all patients aged ≤18 years with suspected aspirated FB transferred to our institution for emergent surgical intervention between July 1, 2013 and March 1, 2023. We determined whether they were taken to the OR post-transfer after first being evaluated in our pediatric emergency department/intensive care unit (Standard protocol) or transported directly to the OR by the transport team (OR Transport protocol). Demographics, transport/surgical times, and clinical data were compared between the groups using t-test and Mann-Whitney U test.

Results

Of the 27 children who met the inclusion criteria, 14 (51.9%) were transported via the Standard protocol and 13 (48.1%) via the OR Transport protocol. Demographics, referring hospital characteristics, time of transfer request, need for mechanical ventilation pretransport, and transport mode were not different; rates of critical care transports were higher for the OR Transport group than for the Standard group (P = .016). Compared with the Standard group, the OR Transport group had shorter median (interquartile range) times from transport arrival to start of surgery (8 [0-15.5] vs. 94.5 [25.75-148.75] minutes, P < .001) and from transport dispatch to surgery (103 [64.25-144] vs. 179 [115.5-265] minutes, P = .035). Although not statistically significant, the OR Transport group had a lower hospitalization rate after the surgery compared with the Standard group (38.5% vs. 64.3%).

Conclusion

Implementation of a direct admission to the OR protocol seems to expedite definitive treatment and may be associated with a decreased need for hospitalization for children with airway FBs who require interhospital transport for emergent surgical intervention.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Air Medical Journal
Air Medical Journal Nursing-Emergency Nursing
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
112
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Air Medical Journal is the official journal of the five leading air medical transport associations in the United States. AMJ is the premier provider of information for the medical transport industry, addressing the unique concerns of medical transport physicians, nurses, pilots, paramedics, emergency medical technicians, communication specialists, and program administrators. The journal contains practical how-to articles, debates on controversial industry issues, legislative updates, case studies, and peer-reviewed original research articles covering all aspects of the medical transport profession.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信