Renewable R&D investments and carbon emissions in G7 countries: The mediating roles of technology and economic efficiency

IF 3.8 3区 经济学 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS
Rajitha Rajendran , Jayaraman Krishnaswamy , Nava Subramaniam , P.K. Viswanathan
{"title":"Renewable R&D investments and carbon emissions in G7 countries: The mediating roles of technology and economic efficiency","authors":"Rajitha Rajendran ,&nbsp;Jayaraman Krishnaswamy ,&nbsp;Nava Subramaniam ,&nbsp;P.K. Viswanathan","doi":"10.1016/j.jup.2025.101898","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The planet is at a critical juncture in addressing the ongoing climatic crisis, with increasing calls to reduce atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> concentrations to stabilise global climate change. A fundamental shift from fossil fuels to clean and renewable energy (RE) systems involves technological development. However, the mechanics of renewable energy funding are poorly understood, slowing the financing rate for renewable energy technology (RETs). This study explores the efficiency of RETs (hydropower, wind, solar, and biomass) and their role in determining the public Renewable R&amp;D investments (RRDI) for CO2 reduction in G7 countries. The analysis focuses on the carbon efficiency of disaggregated energy production technologies, including hydropower, wind, solar, and biomass, as mediators between R&amp;D funding and carbon emissions. The study introduces GDP per capita (GDPpc) as the sequential-mediator to examine the economic efficiency of these technologies. The proposed conceptual framework is supported by the multi-level perspective socio-technical transition theory. The G7 countries' annual data from 2000 to 2021 is used to evaluate the hypotheses. Multiple regression using SPSS Process-Macro was performed using bootstrap analysis to estimate robustness. The findings indicate that public R&amp;D funding significantly improves the carbon-efficiency of G7 countries RETs. However, the technological interaction with GDPpc is unfavourable in increasing CO<sub>2</sub> emissions, revealing that RETs are carbon-efficient but not economically efficient. G7 countries require policies to improve the profitability of RETs by incentivising demand-side technologies. The novelty of this study is its examination of the technological and economic effectiveness of the RETs in the G7 using a management conceptual framework, which offers country-specific recommendations for R&amp;D investment portfolios.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23554,"journal":{"name":"Utilities Policy","volume":"94 ","pages":"Article 101898"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Utilities Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095717872500013X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The planet is at a critical juncture in addressing the ongoing climatic crisis, with increasing calls to reduce atmospheric CO2 concentrations to stabilise global climate change. A fundamental shift from fossil fuels to clean and renewable energy (RE) systems involves technological development. However, the mechanics of renewable energy funding are poorly understood, slowing the financing rate for renewable energy technology (RETs). This study explores the efficiency of RETs (hydropower, wind, solar, and biomass) and their role in determining the public Renewable R&D investments (RRDI) for CO2 reduction in G7 countries. The analysis focuses on the carbon efficiency of disaggregated energy production technologies, including hydropower, wind, solar, and biomass, as mediators between R&D funding and carbon emissions. The study introduces GDP per capita (GDPpc) as the sequential-mediator to examine the economic efficiency of these technologies. The proposed conceptual framework is supported by the multi-level perspective socio-technical transition theory. The G7 countries' annual data from 2000 to 2021 is used to evaluate the hypotheses. Multiple regression using SPSS Process-Macro was performed using bootstrap analysis to estimate robustness. The findings indicate that public R&D funding significantly improves the carbon-efficiency of G7 countries RETs. However, the technological interaction with GDPpc is unfavourable in increasing CO2 emissions, revealing that RETs are carbon-efficient but not economically efficient. G7 countries require policies to improve the profitability of RETs by incentivising demand-side technologies. The novelty of this study is its examination of the technological and economic effectiveness of the RETs in the G7 using a management conceptual framework, which offers country-specific recommendations for R&D investment portfolios.

Abstract Image

G7国家可再生能源研发投资与碳排放:技术和经济效率的中介作用
地球正处于应对持续气候危机的关键时刻,越来越多的人呼吁减少大气中的二氧化碳浓度,以稳定全球气候变化。从化石燃料到清洁和可再生能源(RE)系统的根本转变涉及技术发展。然而,人们对可再生能源的融资机制知之甚少,这减慢了可再生能源技术(ret)的融资速度。本研究探讨了RETs(水电、风能、太阳能和生物质能)的效率,以及它们在确定G7国家公共可再生能源研发投资(RRDI)以减少二氧化碳方面的作用。分析的重点是分解能源生产技术的碳效率,包括水电、风能、太阳能和生物质能,它们是研发资金和碳排放之间的中介。本研究引入人均GDP (GDPpc)作为序贯中介来检验这些技术的经济效率。本文提出的概念框架得到了多层次社会技术转型理论的支持。G7国家2000年至2021年的年度数据用于评估假设。使用SPSS Process-Macro进行多元回归,采用自举分析来估计稳健性。研究结果表明,公共研发资金显著提高了G7国家retts的碳效率。然而,技术与GDPpc的相互作用不利于增加二氧化碳排放,这表明rett具有碳效率,但经济效率不高。七国集团国家要求出台政策,通过激励需求方技术来提高RETs的盈利能力。这项研究的新颖之处在于,它使用管理概念框架审查了七国集团中rett的技术和经济效益,该框架为研发投资组合提供了具体国家的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Utilities Policy
Utilities Policy ENERGY & FUELS-ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
10.00%
发文量
94
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: Utilities Policy is deliberately international, interdisciplinary, and intersectoral. Articles address utility trends and issues in both developed and developing economies. Authors and reviewers come from various disciplines, including economics, political science, sociology, law, finance, accounting, management, and engineering. Areas of focus include the utility and network industries providing essential electricity, natural gas, water and wastewater, solid waste, communications, broadband, postal, and public transportation services. Utilities Policy invites submissions that apply various quantitative and qualitative methods. Contributions are welcome from both established and emerging scholars as well as accomplished practitioners. Interdisciplinary, comparative, and applied works are encouraged. Submissions to the journal should have a clear focus on governance, performance, and/or analysis of public utilities with an aim toward informing the policymaking process and providing recommendations as appropriate. Relevant topics and issues include but are not limited to industry structures and ownership, market design and dynamics, economic development, resource planning, system modeling, accounting and finance, infrastructure investment, supply and demand efficiency, strategic management and productivity, network operations and integration, supply chains, adaptation and flexibility, service-quality standards, benchmarking and metrics, benefit-cost analysis, behavior and incentives, pricing and demand response, economic and environmental regulation, regulatory performance and impact, restructuring and deregulation, and policy institutions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信