Cortical activation and functional connectivity in visual-cognitive-motor networks during motor-cognitive exercise

IF 2.6 3区 心理学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Thorben Hülsdünker , Maxime Laporte , Andreas Mierau , Daniel Büchel
{"title":"Cortical activation and functional connectivity in visual-cognitive-motor networks during motor-cognitive exercise","authors":"Thorben Hülsdünker ,&nbsp;Maxime Laporte ,&nbsp;Andreas Mierau ,&nbsp;Daniel Büchel","doi":"10.1016/j.bbr.2025.115491","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>When compared to computer-based brain training, motor-cognitive exercises and exergaming claim to provide stronger brain activation and better transfer due to the integration of a more complex motor task. To evaluate if this is supported by neural dynamics, this study compared event-related potentials and connectivity between a cognitive and motor-cognitive training task.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>21 participants performed a choice-reaction task with either an upper extremity button press (cognitive condition) or lower extremity stepping movement (motor-cognitive condition) input using the SKILLCOURT technology. The visual stimulation and cognitive task were identical. In addition to reaction time, neural activity was recorded using a 64-channel EEG system. Time course of neural activation and event-related potential data in visual premotor, primary motor and sensory regions of interest were compared between conditions. In addition, connectivity was calculated to identify differences in functional communication.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Neural engagement was stronger in the motor-cognitive condition as reflected by a higher amplitude (p &lt; 0.001) and longer latency (p = 0.02) of the BA6 negativity potential as well as higher activity in electrodes representing the foot region of the primary motor cortex (p &lt; 0.001). This was accompanied by enhanced connectivity between electrodes covering the premotor cortex and frontal, primary motor and visual areas p &lt; 0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The findings suggest that the premotor cortex plays a key role in motor-cognitive training. This supports the assumption of stronger engagement of motor areas in motor-cognitive when compared to cognitive training and shed light on the neural processes that may underly superior training effects when compared to computer-based cognitive training.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8823,"journal":{"name":"Behavioural Brain Research","volume":"484 ","pages":"Article 115491"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioural Brain Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166432825000774","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

When compared to computer-based brain training, motor-cognitive exercises and exergaming claim to provide stronger brain activation and better transfer due to the integration of a more complex motor task. To evaluate if this is supported by neural dynamics, this study compared event-related potentials and connectivity between a cognitive and motor-cognitive training task.

Methods

21 participants performed a choice-reaction task with either an upper extremity button press (cognitive condition) or lower extremity stepping movement (motor-cognitive condition) input using the SKILLCOURT technology. The visual stimulation and cognitive task were identical. In addition to reaction time, neural activity was recorded using a 64-channel EEG system. Time course of neural activation and event-related potential data in visual premotor, primary motor and sensory regions of interest were compared between conditions. In addition, connectivity was calculated to identify differences in functional communication.

Results

Neural engagement was stronger in the motor-cognitive condition as reflected by a higher amplitude (p < 0.001) and longer latency (p = 0.02) of the BA6 negativity potential as well as higher activity in electrodes representing the foot region of the primary motor cortex (p < 0.001). This was accompanied by enhanced connectivity between electrodes covering the premotor cortex and frontal, primary motor and visual areas p < 0.05).

Conclusion

The findings suggest that the premotor cortex plays a key role in motor-cognitive training. This supports the assumption of stronger engagement of motor areas in motor-cognitive when compared to cognitive training and shed light on the neural processes that may underly superior training effects when compared to computer-based cognitive training.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Behavioural Brain Research
Behavioural Brain Research 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
383
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: Behavioural Brain Research is an international, interdisciplinary journal dedicated to the publication of articles in the field of behavioural neuroscience, broadly defined. Contributions from the entire range of disciplines that comprise the neurosciences, behavioural sciences or cognitive sciences are appropriate, as long as the goal is to delineate the neural mechanisms underlying behaviour. Thus, studies may range from neurophysiological, neuroanatomical, neurochemical or neuropharmacological analysis of brain-behaviour relations, including the use of molecular genetic or behavioural genetic approaches, to studies that involve the use of brain imaging techniques, to neuroethological studies. Reports of original research, of major methodological advances, or of novel conceptual approaches are all encouraged. The journal will also consider critical reviews on selected topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信