Emotional Intelligence Moderates the Relationships Between Teachers’ Emotions and Life Satisfaction: A Longitudinal Study During the Teachers’ Role Transition

IF 3.3 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Kuilin Ying, Mengmeng Sun, Changchun Hao, YangMei Luo, Xuhai Chen
{"title":"Emotional Intelligence Moderates the Relationships Between Teachers’ Emotions and Life Satisfaction: A Longitudinal Study During the Teachers’ Role Transition","authors":"Kuilin Ying, Mengmeng Sun, Changchun Hao, YangMei Luo, Xuhai Chen","doi":"10.1007/s10902-025-00873-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Extensive research has explored the link between emotions and life satisfaction, yet a notable gap remains in understanding the prospective connections between teacher work-related emotions and life satisfaction during role transitions—a critical period in teacher development—and the moderating impact of emotional intelligence (EI). To address this, we used cross-lagged models to analyze the relationship between work-related emotions and life satisfaction in 357 novice teachers, from their internship through their first year of teaching, and explored the moderating role of EI in this relationship. The results indicated that positive emotions positively predicted future life satisfaction, while negative emotions had a negative effect over time. Positive emotions exhibited a stronger correlation with life satisfaction compared to negative ones. Furthermore, EI moderated these relationships: Among high-EI teachers, positive emotions predicted increased life satisfaction, which subsequently predicted fewer future negative emotions. In contrast, among low-EI teachers, negative emotions predicted lower life satisfaction. These findings underscore the importance of promoting positive emotions and enhancing emotional intelligence to bolster teachers' well-being.</p>","PeriodicalId":15837,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Happiness Studies","volume":"65 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Happiness Studies","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-025-00873-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Extensive research has explored the link between emotions and life satisfaction, yet a notable gap remains in understanding the prospective connections between teacher work-related emotions and life satisfaction during role transitions—a critical period in teacher development—and the moderating impact of emotional intelligence (EI). To address this, we used cross-lagged models to analyze the relationship between work-related emotions and life satisfaction in 357 novice teachers, from their internship through their first year of teaching, and explored the moderating role of EI in this relationship. The results indicated that positive emotions positively predicted future life satisfaction, while negative emotions had a negative effect over time. Positive emotions exhibited a stronger correlation with life satisfaction compared to negative ones. Furthermore, EI moderated these relationships: Among high-EI teachers, positive emotions predicted increased life satisfaction, which subsequently predicted fewer future negative emotions. In contrast, among low-EI teachers, negative emotions predicted lower life satisfaction. These findings underscore the importance of promoting positive emotions and enhancing emotional intelligence to bolster teachers' well-being.

情绪智力调节教师情绪与生活满意度的关系:教师角色转换的纵向研究
广泛的研究已经探索了情绪和生活满意度之间的联系,然而,在理解角色转换期间(教师发展的关键时期)教师工作相关情绪和生活满意度之间的潜在联系以及情绪智力(EI)的调节作用方面,仍然存在显著的差距。为了解决这个问题,我们使用交叉滞后模型分析了357名新教师从实习到第一年的工作情绪与生活满意度之间的关系,并探讨了情商在这种关系中的调节作用。结果表明,积极情绪对未来生活满意度有正向影响,而消极情绪对未来生活满意度有负向影响。与消极情绪相比,积极情绪与生活满意度的相关性更强。此外,情商调节了这些关系:在高情商的教师中,积极情绪预示着生活满意度的提高,而生活满意度随后预示着未来负面情绪的减少。相反,在低情商教师中,负面情绪预示着较低的生活满意度。这些发现强调了促进积极情绪和提高情商对提高教师幸福感的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
6.50%
发文量
110
期刊介绍: The international peer-reviewed Journal of Happiness Studies is devoted to theoretical and applied advancements in all areas of well-being research. It covers topics referring to both the hedonic and eudaimonic perspectives characterizing well-being studies. The former includes the investigation of cognitive dimensions such as satisfaction with life, and positive affect and emotions. The latter includes the study of constructs and processes related to optimal psychological functioning, such as meaning and purpose in life, character strengths, personal growth, resilience, optimism, hope, and self-determination. In addition to contributions on appraisal of life-as-a-whole, the journal accepts papers investigating these topics in relation to specific domains, such as family, education, physical and mental health, and work. The journal welcomes high-quality theoretical and empirical submissions in the fields of economics, psychology and sociology, as well as contributions from researchers in the domains of education, medicine, philosophy and other related fields. The Journal of Happiness Studies provides a forum for three main areas in happiness research: 1) theoretical conceptualizations of well-being, happiness and the good life; 2) empirical investigation of well-being and happiness in different populations, contexts and cultures; 3) methodological advancements and development of new assessment instruments. The journal addresses the conceptualization, operationalization and measurement of happiness and well-being dimensions, as well as the individual, socio-economic and cultural factors that may interact with them as determinants or outcomes. Central Questions include, but are not limited to: Conceptualization: What meanings are denoted by terms like happiness and well-being? How do these fit in with broader conceptions of the good life? Operationalization and Measurement: Which methods can be used to assess how people feel about life? How to operationalize a new construct or an understudied dimension in the well-being domain? What are the best measures for investigating specific well-being related constructs and dimensions? Prevalence and causality Do individuals belonging to different populations and cultures vary in their well-being ratings? How does individual well-being relate to social and economic phenomena (characteristics, circumstances, behavior, events, and policies)? What are the personal, social and economic determinants and causes of individual well-being dimensions? Evaluation: What are the consequences of well-being for individual development and socio-economic progress? Are individual happiness and well-being worthwhile goals for governments and policy makers? Does well-being represent a useful parameter to orient planning in physical and mental healthcare, and in public health? Interdisciplinary studies: How has the study of happiness developed within and across disciplines? Can we link philosophical thought and empirical research? What are the biological correlates of well-being dimensions?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信